On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 04:08:46 +0200
Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Thanks for the insight. I'm definitely trying to fix this based on your
> hint as soon as I get my hand on a board.
I have a patch I forgot to send out. Let me do that now.
-- Steve
Hello Steven,
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 04:44:30 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:43:07 +0100
> Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>
> > However the arrows are still reversed.
>
> This requires a kernel change. The problem is that the print fmt has:
>
> print fmt: "%c%s %s %s %s %s",
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:43:07 +0100
Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> However the arrows are still reversed.
This requires a kernel change. The problem is that the print fmt has:
print fmt: "%c%s %s %s %s %s", (int) REC->path_node && (int) REC->path_connect
? '*' : ' ', __get_str(wname),
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:43:07 +0100
Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Indeed I was on an older version, apologies.
>
> I upgraded both libtraceevent and trace-cmd to master and applied your
> patch, now the %c is formatted correctly.
>
> However the arrows are still reversed.
>
> Is this what you were
Hello Steven,
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:58:52 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:03:12 +0100
> Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > I've come across an unexpected behaviour in the kernel tracing
> > > > infrastructure that looks like a bug, or maybe two.
> > > >
> > > >
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:03:12 +0100
Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> > >
> > > I've come across an unexpected behaviour in the kernel tracing
> > > infrastructure that looks like a bug, or maybe two.
> > >
> > > Cc-ing ASoC maintainers for as it appeared using ASoC traces, but it
> > > does not look
Hello Steven,
thanks for the quick feedback!
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 13:21:46 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 17:49:00 +0100
> Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>
> > Hello Linux tracing maintainers,
>
> Hi Luca!
>
> >
> > I've come across an unexpected behaviour in the kernel tracing
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 17:49:00 +0100
Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Hello Linux tracing maintainers,
Hi Luca!
>
> I've come across an unexpected behaviour in the kernel tracing
> infrastructure that looks like a bug, or maybe two.
>
> Cc-ing ASoC maintainers for as it appeared using ASoC traces, but
Hello Linux tracing maintainers,
I've come across an unexpected behaviour in the kernel tracing
infrastructure that looks like a bug, or maybe two.
Cc-ing ASoC maintainers for as it appeared using ASoC traces, but it
does not look ASoC-specific.
It all started when using this trace-cmd sequence
9 matches
Mail list logo
