On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> I wonder how their approach compares to the RSBAC stuff, though.
> The RSBAC (by Amon Ott) has all the infrastructure available to have
> policy based access control; whenever an access decision has to be
> taken, a call via some interface is made to a
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote:
I wonder how their approach compares to the RSBAC stuff, though.
The RSBAC (by Amon Ott) has all the infrastructure available to have
policy based access control; whenever an access decision has to be
taken, a call via some interface is made to a
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Alex Belits wrote:
> ...so this is the result of Becker's employment at NASA and government's
> legal weirdness (no, I have no idea, why of all possible choices
> "Director, National Security Agency" must represent US government for
> copyright purpose).
Director is just
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 06:39:49PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > These folks are good at what they do and the code is GPL.
> > It is worth starting to consider whether this code, or code
> > from one of the other security-enhancement projects, should
> > be included in the standard kernel for
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, James Lewis Nance wrote:
> > benefits from and which may help cut down computer crime beyond government.
> > (and which of course actually is part of the NSA's real job)
>
> I often wonder how many people know that a whole bunch of the Linux
> networking code is Copyrighted
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 06:39:49PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> I think this is a good point. Its actually a nice testimonial for free
> software that its finally got the NSA contributing code in a way that everyone
> benefits from and which may help cut down computer crime beyond government.
>
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 06:39:49PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > These folks are good at what they do and the code is GPL.
> > It is worth starting to consider whether this code, or code
> > from one of the other security-enhancement projects, should
> > be included in the standard kernel for 2.6 or
> These folks are good at what they do and the code is GPL.
> It is worth starting to consider whether this code, or code
> from one of the other security-enhancement projects, should
> be included in the standard kernel for 2.6 or 3.0.
I think this is a good point. Its actually a nice
Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
> "Mike A. Harris" wrote:
> >
> > Anyone looked into this?
>
> It's an implementation of Domain Enforcement, ported
> from the flask project. It is a prototype.
These folks are good at what they do and the code is GPL.
It is worth starting to consider whether this
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
> Anyone looked into this?
It's an implementation of Domain Enforcement, ported
from the flask project. It is a prototype.
Persons looking for backdoors, tricks, traps, snares,
or ice are going to be disappointed. It's just code
like everone else produces. Much of
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 10:39:03AM +, Alex Buell wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> > The result is available for download at the above URL as well. Has
> > anyone here toyed with it already ?
>
> I'd eyeball the sources for backdoors, if I were you.
>
Hey,
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> The result is available for download at the above URL as well. Has
> anyone here toyed with it already ?
I'd eyeball the sources for backdoors, if I were you.
Cheers,
Alex
--
Here, have some homemade chocolate biscuits.
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
The result is available for download at the above URL as well. Has
anyone here toyed with it already ?
paranaoia
I'd eyeball the sources for backdoors, if I were you.
/paranaoia
Cheers,
Alex
--
Here, have some homemade chocolate biscuits.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 10:39:03AM +, Alex Buell wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
The result is available for download at the above URL as well. Has
anyone here toyed with it already ?
paranaoia
I'd eyeball the sources for backdoors, if I were you.
/paranaoia
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
Anyone looked into this?
It's an implementation of Domain Enforcement, ported
from the flask project. It is a prototype.
Persons looking for backdoors, tricks, traps, snares,
or ice are going to be disappointed. It's just code
like everone else produces. Much of the
Casey Schaufler wrote:
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
Anyone looked into this?
It's an implementation of Domain Enforcement, ported
from the flask project. It is a prototype.
These folks are good at what they do and the code is GPL.
It is worth starting to consider whether this code, or code
These folks are good at what they do and the code is GPL.
It is worth starting to consider whether this code, or code
from one of the other security-enhancement projects, should
be included in the standard kernel for 2.6 or 3.0.
I think this is a good point. Its actually a nice testimonial
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 06:39:49PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
These folks are good at what they do and the code is GPL.
It is worth starting to consider whether this code, or code
from one of the other security-enhancement projects, should
be included in the standard kernel for 2.6 or 3.0.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 06:39:49PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
I think this is a good point. Its actually a nice testimonial for free
software that its finally got the NSA contributing code in a way that everyone
benefits from and which may help cut down computer crime beyond government.
(and
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, James Lewis Nance wrote:
benefits from and which may help cut down computer crime beyond government.
(and which of course actually is part of the NSA's real job)
I often wonder how many people know that a whole bunch of the Linux
networking code is Copyrighted by the
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 06:39:49PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
These folks are good at what they do and the code is GPL.
It is worth starting to consider whether this code, or code
from one of the other security-enhancement projects, should
be included in the standard kernel for 2.6 or
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Alex Belits wrote:
...so this is the result of Becker's employment at NASA and government's
legal weirdness (no, I have no idea, why of all possible choices
"Director, National Security Agency" must represent US government for
copyright purpose).
Director is just
Anyone looked into this?
--
Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate
This message is copyright 2000, all rights reserved.
Views expressed are my own, not necessarily shared by my employer.
23 matches
Mail list logo
