Re: Updated zerocopy patch up on kernel.org

2001-01-12 Thread Anton Blanchard
> > Nothing interesting or new, just merges up with the latest 2.4.1-pre1 > > patch from Linus. > > > > ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.1p1-1.diff.gz > > > > I haven't had any reports from anyone, which must mean that it is > > working perfectly fine and adds no new bu

Re: Updated zerocopy patch up on kernel.org

2001-01-11 Thread Andrew Morton
Ingo Molnar wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, David S. Miller wrote: > > > Nothing interesting or new, just merges up with the latest 2.4.1-pre1 > > patch from Linus. > > > > ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.1p1-1.diff.gz > > > > I haven't had any reports from anyone, whic

Re: Updated zerocopy patch up on kernel.org

2001-01-11 Thread David S. Miller
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:41:30 +0100 (CET) From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, David S. Miller wrote: > I'm actually considering making the SG w/o hwcsum situation illegal. i believe it might still make some limited sense for normal sendmsg() and higher

Re: Updated zerocopy patch up on kernel.org

2001-01-11 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, David S. Miller wrote: >Is there any value to supporting fragments in a driver which >doesn't do hardware checksumming? IIRC Alexey had a patch to do >such for Tulip, but I don't see it in the above patchset. > > I'm actually considering making the SG w/o hwcsum

Re: Updated zerocopy patch up on kernel.org

2001-01-11 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, David S. Miller wrote: > Nothing interesting or new, just merges up with the latest 2.4.1-pre1 > patch from Linus. > > ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.1p1-1.diff.gz > > I haven't had any reports from anyone, which must mean that it is > working perf

Re: Updated zerocopy patch up on kernel.org

2001-01-09 Thread David S. Miller
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 20:23:17 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Is there any value to supporting fragments in a driver which doesn't do hardware checksumming? IIRC Alexey had a patch to do such for Tulip, but I don't see it in the above patchset. I'm actually consider

Re: Updated zerocopy patch up on kernel.org

2001-01-09 Thread Jeff Garzik
"David S. Miller" wrote: > > Nothing interesting or new, just merges up with the latest 2.4.1-pre1 > patch from Linus. > > ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.1p1-1.diff.gz > > I haven't had any reports from anyone, which must mean that it is > working perfectly fine and

Updated zerocopy patch up on kernel.org

2001-01-09 Thread David S. Miller
Nothing interesting or new, just merges up with the latest 2.4.1-pre1 patch from Linus. ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.1p1-1.diff.gz I haven't had any reports from anyone, which must mean that it is working perfectly fine and adds no new bugs, testers are thus in nir