> > Nothing interesting or new, just merges up with the latest 2.4.1-pre1
> > patch from Linus.
> >
> > ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.1p1-1.diff.gz
> >
> > I haven't had any reports from anyone, which must mean that it is
> > working perfectly fine and adds no new bu
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> > Nothing interesting or new, just merges up with the latest 2.4.1-pre1
> > patch from Linus.
> >
> > ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.1p1-1.diff.gz
> >
> > I haven't had any reports from anyone, whic
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:41:30 +0100 (CET)
From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> I'm actually considering making the SG w/o hwcsum situation illegal.
i believe it might still make some limited sense for normal sendmsg()
and higher
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
>Is there any value to supporting fragments in a driver which
>doesn't do hardware checksumming? IIRC Alexey had a patch to do
>such for Tulip, but I don't see it in the above patchset.
>
> I'm actually considering making the SG w/o hwcsum
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> Nothing interesting or new, just merges up with the latest 2.4.1-pre1
> patch from Linus.
>
> ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.1p1-1.diff.gz
>
> I haven't had any reports from anyone, which must mean that it is
> working perf
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 20:23:17 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Is there any value to supporting fragments in a driver which
doesn't do hardware checksumming? IIRC Alexey had a patch to do
such for Tulip, but I don't see it in the above patchset.
I'm actually consider
"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
> Nothing interesting or new, just merges up with the latest 2.4.1-pre1
> patch from Linus.
>
> ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.1p1-1.diff.gz
>
> I haven't had any reports from anyone, which must mean that it is
> working perfectly fine and
Nothing interesting or new, just merges up with the latest 2.4.1-pre1
patch from Linus.
ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.1p1-1.diff.gz
I haven't had any reports from anyone, which must mean that it is
working perfectly fine and adds no new bugs, testers are thus in
nir
8 matches
Mail list logo