Re: VIA chipset discussion

2001-01-23 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Andy Galasso wrote: > I'm not sure how relevant it is, but FWIW here's what I've got: > > MSI 694D Pro Motherboard 2xPIII-800 100MHz FSB > Linux-2.4.0-prerelease SMP > Promise FastTrak100 controller card > 4 IBM DTLA-307030 drives attached to Promise card > boot params: ide2

Re: VIA chipset discussion

2001-01-23 Thread Andy Galasso
1:40 (hdf), sector 0 hdf: drive not ready for command unable to read partition table ... (similar for hdg ... hdh ...) ... -Andy Galasso On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 02:02:17PM -0800, David D.W. Downey wrote: > > Could those that were involved in the VIA chipset discussion email me >

Re: VIA chipset discussion

2001-01-22 Thread Howard Johnson
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 03:53:33PM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 11:42:25PM +, Howard Johnson wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 06:32:39PM -0500, John O'Donnell wrote: > > > Matthew Fredrickson wrote: > > My bet is ACPI/powermanagement messing with it ... Ah, APM. S

Re: VIA chipset discussion

2001-01-21 Thread David D.W. Downey
Ready SeekComplete DataRequest } > end_request: I/O error, dev 21:40 (hdf), sector 0 > hdf: drive not ready for command > unable to read partition table > ... > (similar for hdg ... hdh ...) > ... > > -Andy Galasso > > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 02:02:17PM -08

Re: VIA chipset discussion

2001-01-21 Thread David D.W. Downey
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, John O'Donnell wrote: I also have APM disabled. (I don't think APM support is useful on a server so I default disable it.) > > Forgive me. I know _nothing_ about Power Management resources. > What kind of resouces would PM use to interfere with the mouse. > FYI I have po

Re: VIA chipset discussion

2001-01-21 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 03:04:37AM -0800, David D.W. Downey wrote: > > OK, currently at work so I don't have the affected system in front of > me. I'm doing this from memory.. > > My apologies to those that responded to me. I've been unable to work on > this issue for the last few days due to wo

Re: VIA chipset discussion

2001-01-19 Thread Matthew Fredrickson
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 11:42:01AM -0500, John O'Donnell wrote: > Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 11:42:25PM +, Howard Johnson wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 06:32:39PM -0500, John O'Donnell wrote: > > > > Matthew Fredrickson wrote: > > > > > > > > I have the ASUS

Re: VIA chipset discussion

2001-01-19 Thread John O'Donnell
Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 11:42:25PM +, Howard Johnson wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 06:32:39PM -0500, John O'Donnell wrote: > > > Matthew Fredrickson wrote: > > > > > > I have the ASUS CUV4X. > > > VIA vt82c686a (cf/cg) IDE UDMA66 controller on pci0:4.1 > > > I a

Re: VIA chipset discussion

2001-01-19 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 11:42:25PM +, Howard Johnson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 06:32:39PM -0500, John O'Donnell wrote: > > Matthew Fredrickson wrote: > > > > I have the ASUS CUV4X. > > VIA vt82c686a (cf/cg) IDE UDMA66 controller on pci0:4.1 > > I also run DMA66 with no problems here. >

Re: VIA chipset discussion

2001-01-18 Thread Rogerio Brito
On Jan 18 2001, Matthew Fredrickson wrote: > BTW, are you having any trouble with your ps/2 mouse port in X? Like I said in the previous e-mail, I'm using right now an Asus A7V mobo with Linus' stock kernel 2.2.18 with André's patches. I'm using basically a Debian

Re: VIA chipset discussion

2001-01-18 Thread Howard Johnson
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 06:32:39PM -0500, John O'Donnell wrote: > Matthew Fredrickson wrote: > > I have the ASUS CUV4X. > VIA vt82c686a (cf/cg) IDE UDMA66 controller on pci0:4.1 > I also run DMA66 with no problems here. > > I never have seen any issues with the PS/2 mouse and X. > I use the Logi

Re: VIA chipset discussion

2001-01-18 Thread John O'Donnell
Matthew Fredrickson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 02:04:08AM -0200, Rogerio Brito wrote: > >> On Jan 17 2001, David D.W. Downey wrote: >> >>> Could those that were involved in the VIA chipset discussion email me >>> privately at [EMAIL PROTECTED]? >&g

Re: VIA chipset discussion

2001-01-18 Thread Matthew Fredrickson
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 02:04:08AM -0200, Rogerio Brito wrote: > On Jan 17 2001, David D.W. Downey wrote: > > > > Could those that were involved in the VIA chipset discussion email me > > privately at [EMAIL PROTECTED]? > > Just to add a datapoint to the

Re: VIA chipset discussion

2001-01-18 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 17 Jan 01 at 17:40, Pete Toscano wrote: > according to the linux-usb maintainers, it's a pci irq routing problem. > i've asked jeff garzik and martin mares if they'll look into it, but > they're pretty busy and i haven't heard anything back from them (not > that'd i'd expect to for quite a whil

Re: VIA chipset discussion

2001-01-17 Thread Rogerio Brito
On Jan 17 2001, David D.W. Downey wrote: > > Could those that were involved in the VIA chipset discussion email me > privately at [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Just to add a datapoint to the discussion, I'm using a VIA chipset here (in fact, it's an Asus A7V boa

Re: VIA chipset discussion

2001-01-17 Thread Pete Toscano
e, considering their load). i've asked on the list too, but i've only heard back from people with the same problem, not anyone who can fix the problem. i've pretty much got the same system as you, except for the ultra66 promise card. pete On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, David D.W. Downey wrot

VIA chipset discussion

2001-01-17 Thread David D.W. Downey
Could those that were involved in the VIA chipset discussion email me privately at [EMAIL PROTECTED]? I'm truly interested in solving this issue. I personally think it's more than just the chipset causing the problems. I'm looking for members of the list that are using the ker