Hi Juri,
On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:32:32 +0100 Juri Lelli wrote:
[...]
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > index 6a73e41a2016..43901fa3f269 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > @@ -252,7 +252,6 @@ static void
Hi,
On 13/03/19 15:49, luca abeni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (I added Juri in cc)
>
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:03:12 +0800
> "chengjian (D)" wrote:
> [...]
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > index 31c050a0d0ce..d73cb033a06d 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> >
Hi,
On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 08:43:00 +0800
"chengjian (D)" wrote:
[...]
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > index 6a73e41a2016..43901fa3f269 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > @@ -252,7 +252,6 @@ static void
On 2019/3/13 22:49, luca abeni wrote:
Hi,
After looking at the patch a little bit more and running some tests,
I suspect this solution might be racy:
when the timer is already active, (and hrtimer_start() fails), it
relies on its handler to decrease the running bw (by setting
Hi,
(I added Juri in cc)
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:03:12 +0800
"chengjian (D)" wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 31c050a0d0ce..d73cb033a06d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -252,7 +252,6 @@ static void
Hi all,
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:03:12 +0800
"chengjian (D)" wrote:
> Hi.
>
> When looking to test SCHED_DEADLINE syzkaller report an warn in
> task_non_contending(). I tested the mainline kernel with the C program
> and captured the same call trace.
[...]
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
Hi.
When looking to test SCHED_DEADLINE syzkaller report an warn in
task_non_contending(). I tested the mainline kernel with the C program
and captured the same call trace.
[The previous message contains some strings in other formats,
making the mail less readable. So I resend it. SORRY.]
[
7 matches
Mail list logo