Zachary Amsden wrote:
> It's not for us or Xen. Perhaps it came from lhype?
(I suspect it came from Andi's fevered brain.) If lhype can't deal with
vdso, it can turn it off for itself - but I don't think its a problem
for lhype.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Zachary Amsden wrote:
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Hi Andi,
What problem do they cause together? There's certainly no problem with
Xen+vdso (in fact, its actually very useful so that it picks up the
right libc with Xen-friendly TLS).
Methinks the
Zachary Amsden wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> Hi Andi,
>>
>> What problem do they cause together? There's certainly no problem with
>> Xen+vdso (in fact, its actually very useful so that it picks up the
>> right libc with Xen-friendly TLS).
>>
>
> Methinks the compat VDSO support got
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Hi Andi,
What problem do they cause together? There's certainly no problem with
Xen+vdso (in fact, its actually very useful so that it picks up the
right libc with Xen-friendly TLS).
Methinks the compat VDSO support got broken in the config? Paravirt +
Hi Andi,
What problem do they cause together? There's certainly no problem with
Xen+vdso (in fact, its actually very useful so that it picks up the
right libc with Xen-friendly TLS).
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Hi Andi,
What problem do they cause together? There's certainly no problem with
Xen+vdso (in fact, its actually very useful so that it picks up the
right libc with Xen-friendly TLS).
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Hi Andi,
What problem do they cause together? There's certainly no problem with
Xen+vdso (in fact, its actually very useful so that it picks up the
right libc with Xen-friendly TLS).
Methinks the compat VDSO support got broken in the config? Paravirt +
Zachary Amsden wrote:
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Hi Andi,
What problem do they cause together? There's certainly no problem with
Xen+vdso (in fact, its actually very useful so that it picks up the
right libc with Xen-friendly TLS).
Methinks the compat VDSO support got broken in the
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Zachary Amsden wrote:
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Hi Andi,
What problem do they cause together? There's certainly no problem with
Xen+vdso (in fact, its actually very useful so that it picks up the
right libc with Xen-friendly TLS).
Methinks the
Zachary Amsden wrote:
It's not for us or Xen. Perhaps it came from lhype?
(I suspect it came from Andi's fevered brain.) If lhype can't deal with
vdso, it can turn it off for itself - but I don't think its a problem
for lhype.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
10 matches
Mail list logo
