On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Dorau, Lukasz wrote:
> On Friday, January 17, 2014 10:44 PM Alexei Starovoitov
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
>> wrote:
>> > On 2014.01.17 at 11:58 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Alexei S
On Friday, January 17, 2014 10:44 PM Alexei Starovoitov
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> wrote:
> > On 2014.01.17 at 11:58 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Alexei Starovoitov
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:37 AM,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
wrote:
> On 2014.01.17 at 11:58 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Alexei Starovoitov
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Dorau, Lukasz
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> My story is very simply...
On 2014.01.17 at 11:58 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Alexei Starovoitov
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Dorau, Lukasz
> > wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> My story is very simply...
> >> I applied the following patch:
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/scs
Alexei Starovoitov writes:
>
> disable Value Range Propagation pass:
> -fdisable-tree-vrp1 -fdisable-tree-vrp2
>
> and complete unroll pass:
> -fdisable-tree-cunrolli
Can you file a gcc bug with test case?
-Andi
--
a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this li
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Alexei Starovoitov
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Dorau, Lukasz wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> My story is very simply...
>> I applied the following patch:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
>> +
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Dorau, Lukasz wrote:
> Hi
>
> My story is very simply...
> I applied the following patch:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
> --- a/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
> @@ -698,8 +698,11 @@ static int isci_p
On Friday, January 17, 2014 5:40 PM Sebastian Riemer
wrote:
> On 17.01.2014 14:55, Dorau, Lukasz wrote:
> >
> > Some additional information:
> >
> > The loop 'for' in macro ' for_each_isci_host ' defined as
> (drivers/scsi/isci/host.h:313):
> >
> > #define for_each_isci_host(id, ihost, pdev) \
>
On 17.01.2014 14:55, Dorau, Lukasz wrote:
> On Friday, January 17, 2014 2:37 PM Dorau, Lukasz
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> My story is very simply...
>> I applied the following patch:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
>> +++ b/driv
On Friday, January 17, 2014 2:58 PM Richard Weinberger
wrote:
>
> Can you reproduce this using a standalone test?
> I.e:
> #include
>
> int main()
> {
> assert(2 < 2 != 1);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
No, I can't of course.
Lukasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Dorau, Lukasz wrote:
> Hi
>
> My story is very simply...
> I applied the following patch:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
> --- a/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
> @@ -698,8 +698,11 @@ static int isci_p
On Friday, January 17, 2014 2:37 PM Dorau, Lukasz
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> My story is very simply...
> I applied the following patch:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
> --- a/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
> @@ -698,8 +698,11 @@ static i
Hi
My story is very simply...
I applied the following patch:
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
@@ -698,8 +698,11 @@ static int isci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const
struct pci_device_id *id)
13 matches
Mail list logo