richard -rw- weinberger writes:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 03:32:27PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>>> I just got a new wireless router and stumbled across an odd set of
>>> out-of-tree modules, where two GPL licensed modules were used by a th
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 09:57:08AM +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> Then vendors will do a s/EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL/EXPORT_SYMBOL/g on the kernel.
Huh, "fail building if a module does EXPORT_SYMBOL"...
> Recently I've identified such a case.
Regardless, there's not really a whole lot we can do
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 03:32:27PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> I just got a new wireless router and stumbled across an odd set of
>> out-of-tree modules, where two GPL licensed modules were used by a third
>> proprietary licensed one.
>>
>>
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 03:32:27PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> I just got a new wireless router and stumbled across an odd set of
> out-of-tree modules, where two GPL licensed modules were used by a third
> proprietary licensed one.
>
> The nice router vendor sent me the GPL'd source code, and as e
I just got a new wireless router and stumbled across an odd set of
out-of-tree modules, where two GPL licensed modules were used by a third
proprietary licensed one.
The nice router vendor sent me the GPL'd source code, and as expected
the GPL modules are little more than wrappers working around t
5 matches
Mail list logo
