Re: __bad_udelay() is not included in 2.2.18-pre16

2000-10-18 Thread Alan Cox
> e100.o is network module provided by Intel. I used version 1.3.14. The > second nin_cs.o is for PCMCIA-CS SCSI card. It's located in > ftp://projects.sourceforge.net/pub/pcmcia-cs/contrib/NinjaSCSI3-1.0.2.tar.gz. Ask the authors of those modules to use mdelay() which does millisecond level dela

Re: __bad_udelay() is not included in 2.2.18-pre16

2000-10-18 Thread Daiki Matsuda
Hi, ALL. > > I tested kernel 2.2.18-pre16. And include/asm-i386/delay.h is modified > > from 2.2.17. Some non generous kernel modules use udelay() function in > > its file. But, The function __bad_udelay in delay.h is referred but > > any instance does not exist. So it's caused Unresolved Symbol

Re: __bad_udelay() is not included in 2.2.18-pre16

2000-10-18 Thread Daiki Matsuda
Hi, ALL. > > I tested kernel 2.2.18-pre16. And include/asm-i386/delay.h is modified > > from 2.2.17. Some non generous kernel modules use udelay() function in > > its file. But, The function __bad_udelay in delay.h is referred but > > any instance does not exist. So it's caused Unresolved Symbol

Re: __bad_udelay() is not included in 2.2.18-pre16

2000-10-18 Thread Alan Cox
> I tested kernel 2.2.18-pre16. And include/asm-i386/delay.h is modified > from 2.2.17. Some non generous kernel modules use udelay() function in > its file. But, The function __bad_udelay in delay.h is referred but > any instance does not exist. So it's caused Unresolved Symbol problem. This is

__bad_udelay() is not included in 2.2.18-pre16

2000-10-18 Thread Daiki Matsuda
Hi, ALL. I tested kernel 2.2.18-pre16. And include/asm-i386/delay.h is modified from 2.2.17. Some non generous kernel modules use udelay() function in its file. But, The function __bad_udelay in delay.h is referred but any instance does not exist. So it's caused Unresolved Symbol problem. Regards