Re: adm9240 error handling (was Re: [PATCHv1] hwmon: adm9240: handle temperature readings below 0)

2016-10-05 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/04/2016 10:00 PM, Chris Packham wrote: Hi Guenter, On 10/05/2016 11:10 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 09:09:10PM +, Chris Packham wrote: Of course, all that doesn't solve the real problem in this driver, which is that it ignores error codes from the smbus

Re: adm9240 error handling (was Re: [PATCHv1] hwmon: adm9240: handle temperature readings below 0)

2016-10-05 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/04/2016 10:00 PM, Chris Packham wrote: Hi Guenter, On 10/05/2016 11:10 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 09:09:10PM +, Chris Packham wrote: Of course, all that doesn't solve the real problem in this driver, which is that it ignores error codes from the smbus

adm9240 error handling (was Re: [PATCHv1] hwmon: adm9240: handle temperature readings below 0)

2016-10-04 Thread Chris Packham
Hi Guenter, On 10/05/2016 11:10 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 09:09:10PM +, Chris Packham wrote: >> >>> >>> Of course, all that doesn't solve the real problem in this driver, which is >>> that it ignores error codes from the smbus functions, but that is a >>> different

adm9240 error handling (was Re: [PATCHv1] hwmon: adm9240: handle temperature readings below 0)

2016-10-04 Thread Chris Packham
Hi Guenter, On 10/05/2016 11:10 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 09:09:10PM +, Chris Packham wrote: >> >>> >>> Of course, all that doesn't solve the real problem in this driver, which is >>> that it ignores error codes from the smbus functions, but that is a >>> different