You misunderstood me. I was just making sure Darrick knew about this other
migration change because without it the specific commit you pointed to for mq
won't get the performance improvement. So I was just trying to make sure if
Darrick or others cherry picked they didn't miss out.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 09:55:39AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13 2013 at 3:33pm -0400,
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 13 2013 at 12:09pm -0400,
> > Joe Thornber wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Darrick,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:22:39AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 09:55:39AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13 2013 at 3:33pm -0400,
Mike Snitzer snit...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13 2013 at 12:09pm -0400,
Joe Thornber thorn...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Darrick,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:22:39AM -0700,
You misunderstood me. I was just making sure Darrick knew about this other
migration change because without it the specific commit you pointed to for mq
won't get the performance improvement. So I was just trying to make sure if
Darrick or others cherry picked they didn't miss out.
On Sat, Apr 13 2013 at 3:33pm -0400,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13 2013 at 12:09pm -0400,
> Joe Thornber wrote:
>
> > Hi Darrick,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:22:39AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Lately I've been having some fun playing with bcache,
On Sat, Apr 13 2013 at 3:33pm -0400,
Mike Snitzer snit...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13 2013 at 12:09pm -0400,
Joe Thornber thorn...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Darrick,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:22:39AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
Hi all,
Lately I've been having some fun
On Sat, Apr 13 2013 at 12:09pm -0400,
Joe Thornber wrote:
> Hi Darrick,
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:22:39AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Lately I've been having some fun playing with bcache, dmcache, and
> > enhanceio.
>
> I pushed some tweaks to the mq policy today
Hi Darrick,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:22:39AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Lately I've been having some fun playing with bcache, dmcache, and enhanceio.
I pushed some tweaks to the mq policy today to my thin-dev tree. They
show some improvements to these fio based tests.
In
Hi Darrick,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:22:39AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
Hi all,
Lately I've been having some fun playing with bcache, dmcache, and enhanceio.
I pushed some tweaks to the mq policy today to my thin-dev tree. They
show some improvements to these fio based tests.
In
On Sat, Apr 13 2013 at 12:09pm -0400,
Joe Thornber thorn...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Darrick,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:22:39AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
Hi all,
Lately I've been having some fun playing with bcache, dmcache, and
enhanceio.
I pushed some tweaks to the mq policy
Hi all,
Lately I've been having some fun playing with bcache, dmcache, and enhanceio.
I've an fio config[1] that thinks it simulates a certain kind of workload
by randomly reading and writing 8k blocks to 8x 1GB files. Since the
storage summit is in a week, I thought I might get the party
Hi all,
Lately I've been having some fun playing with bcache, dmcache, and enhanceio.
I've an fio config[1] that thinks it simulates a certain kind of workload
cough by randomly reading and writing 8k blocks to 8x 1GB files. Since the
storage summit is in a week, I thought I might get the party
12 matches
Mail list logo
