-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Geert.
>>I mean: who makes a spelling error in his own first name? ;-)
>
> I don't think so: both `c' and `t' are (different) ASCII-transcripts of the
> actual non-ASCII character that should have been there. Yes, UTF-8 to US-ASCII
> is lossy
Hi Geert,
you wrote on 13 Apr 2005:
> I don't think so: both `c' and `t' are (different) ASCII-transcripts of the
> actual non-ASCII character that should have been there. Yes, UTF-8 to US-ASCII
> is lossy and imprecise ;-)
There is now UTF there :-)
Both Marcin and Martin are the same name, the
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Toon van der Pas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 05:19:34PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> > > On 2005-04-12, at 04:17, Larry McVoy wrote whatever...
> > > Excuse me, but: who gives a damn shit?
> >
> > Lots of people do; those who
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Toon van der Pas wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 05:19:34PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
On 2005-04-12, at 04:17, Larry McVoy wrote whatever...
Excuse me, but: who gives a damn shit?
Lots of people do; those who use
Hi Geert,
you wrote on 13 Apr 2005:
I don't think so: both `c' and `t' are (different) ASCII-transcripts of the
actual non-ASCII character that should have been there. Yes, UTF-8 to US-ASCII
is lossy and imprecise ;-)
There is now UTF there :-)
Both Marcin and Martin are the same name, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Geert.
I mean: who makes a spelling error in his own first name? ;-)
I don't think so: both `c' and `t' are (different) ASCII-transcripts of the
actual non-ASCII character that should have been there. Yes, UTF-8 to US-ASCII
is lossy and
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 05:19:34PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> > On 2005-04-12, at 04:17, Larry McVoy wrote whatever...
> >
> > Excuse me, but: who gives a damn shit?
>
> Lots of people do; those who use bitkeeper, and even people (like me) who
>
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
>
> On 2005-04-12, at 04:17, Larry McVoy wrote whatever...
>
> Excuse me, but: who gives a damn shit?
>
Lots of people do; those who use bitkeeper, and even people (like me) who
don't use it to manage source but still use the info at bkbits.net to
El Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:10:12 +0200,
Marcin Dalecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> On 2005-04-12, at 04:17, Larry McVoy wrote whatever...
>
> Excuse me, but: who gives a damn shit?
All the kernel hackers who used BK for years and are still using it, I'd guess.
-
To unsubscribe from this
tis 2005-04-12 klockan 13:10 +0200 skrev Marcin Dalecki:
> On 2005-04-12, at 04:17, Larry McVoy wrote whatever...
>
> Excuse me, but: who gives a damn shit?
>
Anyone who wants to have access to the history or any other functioning
of the repository.
Please don't pollute this list nor Larry
On 2005-04-12, at 04:17, Larry McVoy wrote whatever...
Excuse me, but: who gives a damn shit?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the
On 2005-04-12, at 04:17, Larry McVoy wrote whatever...
Excuse me, but: who gives a damn shit?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ
tis 2005-04-12 klockan 13:10 +0200 skrev Marcin Dalecki:
On 2005-04-12, at 04:17, Larry McVoy wrote whatever...
Excuse me, but: who gives a damn shit?
Anyone who wants to have access to the history or any other functioning
of the repository.
Please don't pollute this list nor Larry with
El Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:10:12 +0200,
Marcin Dalecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On 2005-04-12, at 04:17, Larry McVoy wrote whatever...
Excuse me, but: who gives a damn shit?
All the kernel hackers who used BK for years and are still using it, I'd guess.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
On 2005-04-12, at 04:17, Larry McVoy wrote whatever...
Excuse me, but: who gives a damn shit?
Lots of people do; those who use bitkeeper, and even people (like me) who
don't use it to manage source but still use the info at bkbits.net to
track
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 05:19:34PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
On 2005-04-12, at 04:17, Larry McVoy wrote whatever...
Excuse me, but: who gives a damn shit?
Lots of people do; those who use bitkeeper, and even people (like me) who
don't use it
Seems to have crashed, we don't know the cause yet. Is there anyone who is
dependent on this tonight? If so I'll drive down and fix it (yeah, very lame
of us, we moved it to a different rack which was too far away from our remote
power so I can't power cycle it remotely. Our bad.)
Let me know,
Seems to have crashed, we don't know the cause yet. Is there anyone who is
dependent on this tonight? If so I'll drive down and fix it (yeah, very lame
of us, we moved it to a different rack which was too far away from our remote
power so I can't power cycle it remotely. Our bad.)
Let me know,
18 matches
Mail list logo
