Re: blackfin + dmaengine: conflicting define/enum "DMA_COMPLETE"

2014-03-11 Thread Oleksandr G Zhadan
On 03/11/2014 06:25 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:59:47AM -0500, Oleksandr G Zhadan wrote: Hello, It's good to "... matched the manual ...", and in this case we can match the manual more pedantically, maybe with prefix "HOST". In the case of Host DMA port STATUS register:

Re: blackfin + dmaengine: conflicting define/enum "DMA_COMPLETE"

2014-03-11 Thread Vinod Koul
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:59:47AM -0500, Oleksandr G Zhadan wrote: > Hello, > > It's good to "... matched the manual ...", and in this case we can > match the manual more pedantically, maybe with prefix "HOST". > > In the case of Host DMA port STATUS register: > > From manual : > HOST_STAT

Re: blackfin + dmaengine: conflicting define/enum "DMA_COMPLETE"

2014-02-27 Thread Oleksandr G Zhadan
Hello, It's good to "... matched the manual ...", and in this case we can match the manual more pedantically, maybe with prefix "HOST". In the case of Host DMA port STATUS register: From manual : HOST_STATUS register bits include: • DMA Ready (DMA_RDY) • FIFO Full (FIFOFULL) • FIFO Empty

Re: blackfin + dmaengine: conflicting define/enum "DMA_COMPLETE"

2014-01-17 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 11 January 2014 13:55:15 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 01/11/2014 07:31 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 01/11/2014 10:09 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> in current linux-next (and net-next) the compilation of the CAN > >> > >> drivers[1] with ARCH=blackfin fails with

Re: blackfin + dmaengine: conflicting define/enum "DMA_COMPLETE"

2014-01-13 Thread Vinod Koul
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:31:00AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 01/11/2014 10:09 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > > Hello, > > > > in current linux-next (and net-next) the compilation of the CAN > > drivers[1] with ARCH=blackfin fails with: > > > >> CC [M] drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.o > >> I

Re: blackfin + dmaengine: conflicting define/enum "DMA_COMPLETE"

2014-01-11 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 01/11/2014 07:31 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 01/11/2014 10:09 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> Hello, >> >> in current linux-next (and net-next) the compilation of the CAN >> drivers[1] with ARCH=blackfin fails with: >> >>> CC [M] drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.o >>> In file included from linux/

Re: blackfin + dmaengine: conflicting define/enum "DMA_COMPLETE"

2014-01-11 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 01/11/2014 10:09 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > Hello, > > in current linux-next (and net-next) the compilation of the CAN > drivers[1] with ARCH=blackfin fails with: > >> CC [M] drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.o >> In file included from linux/include/linux/netdevice.h:38:0, >>

blackfin + dmaengine: conflicting define/enum "DMA_COMPLETE"

2014-01-11 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
Hello, in current linux-next (and net-next) the compilation of the CAN drivers[1] with ARCH=blackfin fails with: > CC [M] drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.o > In file included from linux/include/linux/netdevice.h:38:0, > from linux/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c:32: > linux/include/