Re: bonding.c and proc_fs

2000-10-14 Thread Jorge Nerin
Willy TARREAU wrote: > > Hello ! > > I think that you should wait a bit before writing a config in /proc for the > bonding driver. > I have rewritten quite a part of it to support link detection and make it a bit > fail safe. > Moreover, I had to rewrite partly ifenslave.c (which is included in

Re: bonding.c and proc_fs

2000-10-11 Thread Willy TARREAU
Hello ! I think that you should wait a bit before writing a config in /proc for the bonding driver. I have rewritten quite a part of it to support link detection and make it a bit fail safe. Moreover, I had to rewrite partly ifenslave.c (which is included in the same patch). Everything *seems*

bonding.c and proc_fs

2000-10-11 Thread Sudhindra Herle
Hello, I am writing a /proc interface to the ethernet bonding driver and had the following questions: 1) Why does a slave interface need an IP address? Isn't it sufficient if slave->flags is set to IFF_UP|IFF_RUNNING ? 2) What happens if the MTU of differnet slave devices are different? How

bonding.c and proc_fs

2000-10-11 Thread Sudhindra Herle
Hello, I am writing a /proc interface to the ethernet bonding driver and had the following questions: 1) Why does a slave interface need an IP address? Isn't it sufficient if slave-flags is set to IFF_UP|IFF_RUNNING ? 2) What happens if the MTU of differnet slave devices are different? How

Re: bonding.c and proc_fs

2000-10-11 Thread Willy TARREAU
Hello ! I think that you should wait a bit before writing a config in /proc for the bonding driver. I have rewritten quite a part of it to support link detection and make it a bit fail safe. Moreover, I had to rewrite partly ifenslave.c (which is included in the same patch). Everything *seems*