On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 13:56 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> > > Josh, Adam, would you mind testing the above patch to see if it
>> > > can fix
>> > > your issue?
>> >
>> > Sorry for the delay in reply. I'll try and work with Adam today to
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 13:56 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > Josh, Adam, would you mind testing the above patch to see if it
> > > can fix
> > > your issue?
> >
> > Sorry for the delay in reply. I'll try and work with Adam today to
> > get this tested.
>
> FWIW, reproducing the environment to
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 13:56 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> > > Josh, Adam, would you mind testing the above patch to see if it
>> > > can fix
>> > > your issue?
>> >
>> > Sorry for the delay in reply. I'll try and
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 13:56 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > Josh, Adam, would you mind testing the above patch to see if it
> > > can fix
> > > your issue?
> >
> > Sorry for the delay in reply. I'll try and work with Adam today to
> > get this tested.
>
> FWIW, reproducing the environment to
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:43:15 -0400
>> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>>
>>> Ming, Jens, others:
>>>
>>> Please see this BZ comment that speaks to a 4.3 regression due to the
>>> late bio splitting
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:43:15 -0400
>> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>>
>>> Ming, Jens, others:
>>>
>>> Please see this BZ comment
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:43:15 -0400
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
>> Ming, Jens, others:
>>
>> Please see this BZ comment that speaks to a 4.3 regression due to the
>> late bio splitting changes:
>>
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:43:15 -0400
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
>> Ming, Jens, others:
>>
>> Please see this BZ comment that speaks to a 4.3 regression due to the
>> late bio splitting changes:
>>
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:43:15 -0400
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Ming, Jens, others:
>
> Please see this BZ comment that speaks to a 4.3 regression due to the
> late bio splitting changes:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247382#c41
I think it is a bug of bounce_end_io, and the following
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Ming Lin wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 21:43 -0700, Ming Lin wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> > Ming, Jens, others:
>> >
>> > Please see this BZ comment that speaks to a 4.3 regression due to the
>> > late bio splitting changes:
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 21:43 -0700, Ming Lin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > Ming, Jens, others:
> >
> > Please see this BZ comment that speaks to a 4.3 regression due to the
> > late bio splitting changes:
> >
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 21:43 -0700, Ming Lin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > Ming, Jens, others:
> >
> > Please see this BZ comment that speaks to a 4.3 regression due to the
> > late bio splitting changes:
> >
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Ming Lin wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 21:43 -0700, Ming Lin wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> > Ming, Jens, others:
>> >
>> > Please see this BZ comment that speaks to a 4.3 regression due to
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:43:15 -0400
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Ming, Jens, others:
>
> Please see this BZ comment that speaks to a 4.3 regression due to the
> late bio splitting changes:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247382#c41
I think it is a bug of
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Ming, Jens, others:
>
> Please see this BZ comment that speaks to a 4.3 regression due to the
> late bio splitting changes:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247382#c41
>
> But inlined here so we can continue on list:
> (In reply
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 17:43 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Josh and/or Adam: it would _really_ help if the regression test you
> guys
> are using could be handed-over and/or explained to us. Is it as
> simple
> as loading a 32bit with a particular config? Can you share the guest
> image if it is
Ming, Jens, others:
Please see this BZ comment that speaks to a 4.3 regression due to the
late bio splitting changes:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247382#c41
But inlined here so we can continue on list:
(In reply to Josh Boyer from comment #40)
> The function that was fixed in
Ming, Jens, others:
Please see this BZ comment that speaks to a 4.3 regression due to the
late bio splitting changes:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247382#c41
But inlined here so we can continue on list:
(In reply to Josh Boyer from comment #40)
> The function that was fixed in
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 17:43 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Josh and/or Adam: it would _really_ help if the regression test you
> guys
> are using could be handed-over and/or explained to us. Is it as
> simple
> as loading a 32bit with a particular config? Can you share the guest
> image if it is
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Ming, Jens, others:
>
> Please see this BZ comment that speaks to a 4.3 regression due to the
> late bio splitting changes:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247382#c41
>
> But inlined here so we can continue
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 02 2015 at 10:01P -0400,
>> Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Josh Boyer
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 02 2015 at 10:01P -0400,
> Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Josh Boyer
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The only commit that looks even remotely related
On Sun, Aug 02 2015 at 10:01P -0400,
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >>
> >> The only commit that looks even remotely related (given 32bit concerns)
> >> would be
On Sun, Aug 02 2015 at 10:01P -0400,
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Mike Snitzer snit...@redhat.com wrote:
The only commit that looks even remotely related (given
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Mike Snitzer snit...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 02 2015 at 10:01P -0400,
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Josh Boyer
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Mike Snitzer snit...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 02 2015 at 10:01P -0400,
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Mike Snitzer
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 30 2015 at 7:14pm -0400,
>> Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Josh Boyer
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>> >>
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Mike Snitzer snit...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30 2015 at 7:14pm -0400,
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Josh Boyer
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30 2015 at 7:14pm -0400,
> Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Josh Boyer
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Josh Boyer
>> >> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Mike Snitzer snit...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30 2015 at 7:14pm -0400,
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Ming Lei
On Thu, Jul 30 2015 at 7:14pm -0400,
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Josh Boyer
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Josh Boyer
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Johannes Weiner
wrote:
> On
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Josh Boyer
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:27:16AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hi
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com
On Thu, Jul 30 2015 at 7:14pm -0400,
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Josh Boyer
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Johannes Weiner han...@cmpxchg.org
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:27:16AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Hi All,
We've gotten a report[1] that any of the
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:27:16AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> We've gotten a report[1] that any of the upcoming Fedora 23 install
>>> images are all failing on 32-bit
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:27:16AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We've gotten a report[1] that any of the upcoming Fedora 23 install
>> images are all failing on 32-bit VMs/machines. Looking at the first
>> instance of the
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:27:16AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We've gotten a report[1] that any of the upcoming Fedora 23 install
> images are all failing on 32-bit VMs/machines. Looking at the first
> instance of the oops, it seems to be a bad page state where a page is
> still
Hi All,
We've gotten a report[1] that any of the upcoming Fedora 23 install
images are all failing on 32-bit VMs/machines. Looking at the first
instance of the oops, it seems to be a bad page state where a page is
still charged to a group and it is trying to be freed. The oops
output is below.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Johannes Weiner han...@cmpxchg.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:27:16AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Hi All,
We've gotten a report[1] that any of the upcoming Fedora 23 install
images are all failing on 32-bit VMs/machines. Looking at the first
instance of
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Johannes Weiner han...@cmpxchg.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:27:16AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Hi All,
We've gotten a report[1] that any of the upcoming Fedora 23 install
images
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Johannes Weiner han...@cmpxchg.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:27:16AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Hi All,
Hi All,
We've gotten a report[1] that any of the upcoming Fedora 23 install
images are all failing on 32-bit VMs/machines. Looking at the first
instance of the oops, it seems to be a bad page state where a page is
still charged to a group and it is trying to be freed. The oops
output is below.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:27:16AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Hi All,
We've gotten a report[1] that any of the upcoming Fedora 23 install
images are all failing on 32-bit VMs/machines. Looking at the first
instance of the oops, it seems to be a bad page state where a page is
still charged to
46 matches
Mail list logo