Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:10:53 -0800 "Brandeburg, Jesse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
@@ -1431,6 +1427,10 @@ e1000_open(struct net_device *netdev)
e1000_update_mng_vlan(adapter);
}
+ err = e1000_request_irq(adapter);
+ if (err)
+
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:10:53 -0800 "Brandeburg, Jesse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> @@ -1431,6 +1427,10 @@ e1000_open(struct net_device *netdev)
> e1000_update_mng_vlan(adapter);
> }
>
> + err = e1000_request_irq(adapter);
> + if (err)
> + goto
[Adding Dimitri Mishin to the CC - he proposed the same patch earlier]
Len Brown wrote:
On Thursday 15 February 2007 21:10, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
e1000 faults in 2.6.20-git, while 2.6.20 worked fine.
System is a D875PBZ
On Thursday 15 February 2007 21:10, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> e1000 faults in 2.6.20-git, while 2.6.20 worked fine.
> >>
> >> System is a D875PBZ with LOM.
> >>
> >> clues?
> >
> > I'm guessing this is an old bug
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> e1000 faults in 2.6.20-git, while 2.6.20 worked fine.
>>
>> System is a D875PBZ with LOM.
>>
>> clues?
>
> I'm guessing this is an old bug found by the following bit of
> debug coded added into since v2.6.20
>
> +#ifdef
Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> e1000 faults in 2.6.20-git, while 2.6.20 worked fine.
>
> System is a D875PBZ with LOM.
>
> clues?
I'm guessing this is an old bug found by the following bit of
debug coded added into since v2.6.20
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ
+ if (irqflags &
e1000 faults in 2.6.20-git, while 2.6.20 worked fine.
System is a D875PBZ with LOM.
clues?
thanks,
-Len
Bringing up loopback interface: [ OK ]
Bringing up interface eth0: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
dereference at virtual address
printing eip:
*pde = 3747c001
e1000 faults in 2.6.20-git, while 2.6.20 worked fine.
System is a D875PBZ with LOM.
clues?
thanks,
-Len
Bringing up loopback interface: [ OK ]
Bringing up interface eth0: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
dereference at virtual address
printing eip:
*pde = 3747c001
Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
e1000 faults in 2.6.20-git, while 2.6.20 worked fine.
System is a D875PBZ with LOM.
clues?
I'm guessing this is an old bug found by the following bit of
debug coded added into since v2.6.20
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ
+ if (irqflags IRQF_SHARED) {
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
e1000 faults in 2.6.20-git, while 2.6.20 worked fine.
System is a D875PBZ with LOM.
clues?
I'm guessing this is an old bug found by the following bit of
debug coded added into since v2.6.20
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ
+
On Thursday 15 February 2007 21:10, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
e1000 faults in 2.6.20-git, while 2.6.20 worked fine.
System is a D875PBZ with LOM.
clues?
I'm guessing this is an old bug found by the following bit of
[Adding Dimitri Mishin to the CC - he proposed the same patch earlier]
Len Brown wrote:
On Thursday 15 February 2007 21:10, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
e1000 faults in 2.6.20-git, while 2.6.20 worked fine.
System is a D875PBZ with
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:10:53 -0800 Brandeburg, Jesse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
@@ -1431,6 +1427,10 @@ e1000_open(struct net_device *netdev)
e1000_update_mng_vlan(adapter);
}
+ err = e1000_request_irq(adapter);
+ if (err)
+ goto
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:10:53 -0800 Brandeburg, Jesse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
@@ -1431,6 +1427,10 @@ e1000_open(struct net_device *netdev)
e1000_update_mng_vlan(adapter);
}
+ err = e1000_request_irq(adapter);
+ if (err)
+
14 matches
Mail list logo