laby
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e 3.9-rc1 suspend failure (was: Re: e1000e:
> nic does not work properly after cold power on)
>
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 22:48:30 +0100 Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 07:15:07PM +0100, Morten Stevens wrote:
> > > C
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 22:48:30 +0100 Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 07:15:07PM +0100, Morten Stevens wrote:
> > Can you reproduce this with linux 3.9-rc1? 3.9-rc1 has the latest
> > upstream driver (e1000e 2.2.14) which contains many bugfixes.
>
On my system (ThinkPad T420) I get:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 07:15:07PM +0100, Morten Stevens wrote:
> Can you reproduce this with linux 3.9-rc1? 3.9-rc1 has the latest
> upstream driver (e1000e 2.2.14) which contains many bugfixes.
This e1000e thing gets more b0rked by the minute. This is what happens
when I try to suspend with
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 07:15:07PM +0100, Morten Stevens wrote:
Can you reproduce this with linux 3.9-rc1? 3.9-rc1 has the latest
upstream driver (e1000e 2.2.14) which contains many bugfixes.
This e1000e thing gets more b0rked by the minute. This is what happens
when I try to suspend with
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 22:48:30 +0100 Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 07:15:07PM +0100, Morten Stevens wrote:
Can you reproduce this with linux 3.9-rc1? 3.9-rc1 has the latest
upstream driver (e1000e 2.2.14) which contains many bugfixes.
On my system (ThinkPad T420) I get:
[
: [E1000-devel] e1000e 3.9-rc1 suspend failure (was: Re: e1000e:
nic does not work properly after cold power on)
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 22:48:30 +0100 Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 07:15:07PM +0100, Morten Stevens wrote:
Can you reproduce this with linux 3.9-rc1? 3.9-rc1 has
6 matches
Mail list logo
