Re: fuse is cool and robust

On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 10:55:15PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > encfs being hard from kernel space? I've seen a whole cryptoloop in the > kernel. Can't be "hard". At least unpracticable. encfs is not cryptoloop - please follow the URL. -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database dr

Re: fuse is cool and robust

bert hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm wondering what the status of Fuse is wrt to 2.6.12 or 2.6.13 Christoph H. has indicated that he was going to review the code and I've been holding off pending that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the bod

Re: fuse is cool and robust

>I do understand that a filesystem is a particularly poor API for many >things, and I'm not in favour of 'sqlfs' or 'ftpfs', but fuse IS a great >enabler. 'encfs' would be hard to do from kernel space (or at least, a lot >harder). http://arg0.net/users/vgough/encfs.html encfs being hard from kerne

fuse is cool and robust

Miklos, Andrew, I'm wondering what the status of Fuse is wrt to 2.6.12 or 2.6.13, especially since the code is (now) perfectly orthogonal. I just spent a short amount of time setting up and trying to break fusefs and some of the filesystems based on it, and I did not succeed (in breaking it). S