> > IMHO the context extension doesn't work well enough in sparse to
> > document and implement as is. It would be much better if it actually was
> > able to differentiate between contexts, rather than treating each one
> > the same.
>
> That would certainly be nice, but that's something
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:33:16AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 21:27 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > However, I would also like support for the context extensions, but I'm
> > not knowledgeable enough to describe the semantics accurately. Would
> > anyone be willing to
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:27:08PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> I have filed gcc tickets asking for direct support in gcc for some
> sparse extensions that we use heavily in the kernel:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59850
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59851
>
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 21:27 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> However, I would also like support for the context extensions, but I'm
> not knowledgeable enough to describe the semantics accurately. Would
> anyone be willing to file a ticket describing how the context extension
> works well enough
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 21:27 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
However, I would also like support for the context extensions, but I'm
not knowledgeable enough to describe the semantics accurately. Would
anyone be willing to file a ticket describing how the context extension
works well enough that
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:27:08PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
I have filed gcc tickets asking for direct support in gcc for some
sparse extensions that we use heavily in the kernel:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59850
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59851
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:33:16AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 21:27 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
However, I would also like support for the context extensions, but I'm
not knowledgeable enough to describe the semantics accurately. Would
anyone be willing to file a
IMHO the context extension doesn't work well enough in sparse to
document and implement as is. It would be much better if it actually was
able to differentiate between contexts, rather than treating each one
the same.
That would certainly be nice, but that's something actually much
On 01/16/2014 09:27 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have filed gcc tickets asking for direct support in gcc for some
> sparse extensions that we use heavily in the kernel:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59850
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59851
>
Add:
Hi,
I have filed gcc tickets asking for direct support in gcc for some
sparse extensions that we use heavily in the kernel:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59850
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59851
However, I would also like support for the context extensions, but I'm
Hi,
I have filed gcc tickets asking for direct support in gcc for some
sparse extensions that we use heavily in the kernel:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59850
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59851
However, I would also like support for the context extensions, but I'm
On 01/16/2014 09:27 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Hi,
I have filed gcc tickets asking for direct support in gcc for some
sparse extensions that we use heavily in the kernel:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59850
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59851
Add:
12 matches
Mail list logo