On Fri, 3 Aug 2018, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 03.08.2018 22:00, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Aug 2018, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >
> >> In case of a domain hierarchy we may miss the IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE
> >> flag because we look at top of the stack only. See also discussion
> >> here: htt
On 03.08.2018 22:00, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2018, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>
>> In case of a domain hierarchy we may miss the IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE
>> flag because we look at top of the stack only. See also discussion
>> here: https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=153301773524685&w=2
>
On Fri, 3 Aug 2018, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> In case of a domain hierarchy we may miss the IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE
> flag because we look at top of the stack only. See also discussion
> here: https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=153301773524685&w=2
I think you misunderstood:
> I think the top most c
In case of a domain hierarchy we may miss the IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE
flag because we look at top of the stack only. See also discussion
here: https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=153301773524685&w=2
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit
---
Uups, PATCH tag was missing.
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 12 +++
In case of a domain hierarchy we may miss the IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE
flag because we look at top of the stack only. See also discussion
here: https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=153301773524685&w=2
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 11 inserti
5 matches
Mail list logo