On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:12:22PM +, Paulo Marques wrote:
> Paulo Marques wrote:
> >[...]
> >A simple and robust way is to do the sampling on a list of symbols
> >sorted by symbol name. This way, even if the symbol positions that are
> >given to scripts/kallsyms change, the symbols sampled
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 09:54:41AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:12:22PM +, Paulo Marques wrote:
> > Paulo Marques wrote:
> > >[...]
> > >A simple and robust way is to do the sampling on a list of symbols
> > >sorted by symbol name. This way, even if the symbol
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:12:22PM +, Paulo Marques wrote:
Paulo Marques wrote:
[...]
A simple and robust way is to do the sampling on a list of symbols
sorted by symbol name. This way, even if the symbol positions that are
given to scripts/kallsyms change, the symbols
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:12:22PM +, Paulo Marques wrote:
Paulo Marques wrote:
[...]
A simple and robust way is to do the sampling on a list of symbols
sorted by symbol name. This way, even if the symbol positions that are
given to scripts/kallsyms change, the symbols
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 09:54:41AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:12:22PM +, Paulo Marques wrote:
Paulo Marques wrote:
[...]
A simple and robust way is to do the sampling on a list of symbols
sorted by symbol name. This way, even if the symbol positions that
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:12:22PM +, Paulo Marques wrote:
Paulo Marques wrote:
[...]
A simple and robust way is to do the sampling on a list of symbols
sorted by symbol name. This way, even if the symbol positions that are
given to scripts/kallsyms change, the symbols sampled will be
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:12:22PM +, Paulo Marques wrote:
> Paulo Marques wrote:
> >[...]
> >A simple and robust way is to do the sampling on a list of symbols
> >sorted by symbol name. This way, even if the symbol positions that are
> >given to scripts/kallsyms change, the symbols sampled
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:12:22PM +, Paulo Marques wrote:
Paulo Marques wrote:
[...]
A simple and robust way is to do the sampling on a list of symbols
sorted by symbol name. This way, even if the symbol positions that are
given to scripts/kallsyms change, the symbols sampled will be
Paulo Marques wrote:
[...]
A simple and robust way is to do the sampling on a list of symbols
sorted by symbol name. This way, even if the symbol positions that are
given to scripts/kallsyms change, the symbols sampled will be the same.
I'll do the patch to do this and send it ASAP.
Ok, here it
Paulo Marques wrote:
[...]
A simple and robust way is to do the sampling on a list of symbols
sorted by symbol name. This way, even if the symbol positions that are
given to scripts/kallsyms change, the symbols sampled will be the same.
I'll do the patch to do this and send it ASAP.
Ok, here it
Paulo Marques wrote:
[...]
Can you send me privately a tar.bz2 containing your .config,
.tmp_kallsyms1.S and .tmp_kallsyms2.S so I can try to figure out what's
going on?
Ok, after some investigation into the files I was able to find out the
problem.
scripts/kallsyms.c uses a subset of the
Dominik Brodowski wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 12:35:54PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Dominik Brodowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
compiling -mm2 on my x86 box results in:
SYSMAP .tmp_System.map
Inconsistent kallsyms data
Try setting CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS
make: *** [vmlinux] Fehler 1
Dominik Brodowski wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 12:35:54PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Dominik Brodowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
compiling -mm2 on my x86 box results in:
SYSMAP .tmp_System.map
Inconsistent kallsyms data
Try setting CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS
make: *** [vmlinux] Fehler 1
Paulo Marques wrote:
[...]
Can you send me privately a tar.bz2 containing your .config,
.tmp_kallsyms1.S and .tmp_kallsyms2.S so I can try to figure out what's
going on?
Ok, after some investigation into the files I was able to find out the
problem.
scripts/kallsyms.c uses a subset of the
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 12:35:54PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Dominik Brodowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > compiling -mm2 on my x86 box results in:
> >
> > SYSMAP .tmp_System.map
> > Inconsistent kallsyms data
> > Try setting CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS
> > make: *** [vmlinux] Fehler 1
Dominik Brodowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> compiling -mm2 on my x86 box results in:
>
> SYSMAP .tmp_System.map
> Inconsistent kallsyms data
> Try setting CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS
> make: *** [vmlinux] Fehler 1
>
> gcc-Version 3.4.3 20050110 (Gentoo Linux 3.4.3.20050110,
>
compiling -mm2 on my x86 box results in:
SYSMAP .tmp_System.map
Inconsistent kallsyms data
Try setting CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS
make: *** [vmlinux] Fehler 1
gcc-Version 3.4.3 20050110 (Gentoo Linux 3.4.3.20050110, ssp-3.4.3.20050110-0,
pie-8.7.7)
Dominik
-
To unsubscribe from this
compiling -mm2 on my x86 box results in:
SYSMAP .tmp_System.map
Inconsistent kallsyms data
Try setting CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS
make: *** [vmlinux] Fehler 1
gcc-Version 3.4.3 20050110 (Gentoo Linux 3.4.3.20050110, ssp-3.4.3.20050110-0,
pie-8.7.7)
Dominik
-
To unsubscribe from this
Dominik Brodowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
compiling -mm2 on my x86 box results in:
SYSMAP .tmp_System.map
Inconsistent kallsyms data
Try setting CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS
make: *** [vmlinux] Fehler 1
gcc-Version 3.4.3 20050110 (Gentoo Linux 3.4.3.20050110,
ssp-3.4.3.20050110-0,
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 12:35:54PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Dominik Brodowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
compiling -mm2 on my x86 box results in:
SYSMAP .tmp_System.map
Inconsistent kallsyms data
Try setting CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS
make: *** [vmlinux] Fehler 1
gcc-Version
20 matches
Mail list logo
