Thus wrote Russell King:
> Ok, here's the patch. Please test and let me know if it resolves your
> problem. Thanks.
Oh, I thought I did reply to your previous mail. In case you didn't get it,
yes, the patch fixes the problem.
Thanks,
--
Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:37:20PM +, Russell King wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 12:09:46AM +0100, Karol Kozimor wrote:
> > I've finally got around to test latest kernels and managed to find a bug in
> > the serial subsystem, which happens during suspend.
>
> Yes, serial_cs is claiming tha
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:37:20PM +, Russell King wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 12:09:46AM +0100, Karol Kozimor wrote:
> > I've finally got around to test latest kernels and managed to find a bug in
> > the serial subsystem, which happens during suspend.
>
> Yes, serial_cs is claiming tha
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 12:09:46AM +0100, Karol Kozimor wrote:
> I've finally got around to test latest kernels and managed to find a bug in
> the serial subsystem, which happens during suspend.
Yes, serial_cs is claiming that we don't have a device associated with
the port, so we're treating it
g bug appears. Note that 2.6.9 works perfectly.
#v+ handwritten, 2.6.11-rc5
kernel BUG at drivers/serial/8250.c:1256!
invalid operand: [#1]
PREEMPT
[...]
EIP is at serial_unlink_irq_chain+0x4b/0x60 [8250]
[...]
Call Trace:
uart_suspend_port [serial_core]
serial_suspend [serial_cs]
serial_event [seri
5 matches
Mail list logo