We're a little busy right now, we'll try and get to this.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:09:58PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:10:17PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > I noticed this problem some time ago when trying to see whether the
> > darcs repository is consistent
We're a little busy right now, we'll try and get to this.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:09:58PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:10:17PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
I noticed this problem some time ago when trying to see whether the
darcs repository is consistent with
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:10:17PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> I noticed this problem some time ago when trying to see whether the
> darcs repository is consistent with the BK one:
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel=110026570201544=2
>
> A solution is to use the "(Logical
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:58:07AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> FYI, I haven't tried using cvsps on the kernel CVS, but I used to use it on
> GCC - and it fell down like this on a constant basis.
Interesting, for me it always worked fine on the kernel until last
month.
> You might want to
Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> sorry to annoy you about this, but something is going wrong with either
> cvsps or the kernel CVS.
>
> I reproducibly get this as the last changeset, note the date. The
> --bkcvs breaks completely too, but that would be a minor issue since
> cvsps by
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:42:03PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Any help is appreciated. I'm just starting to look more seriously into
> this since I've some tools that depends on the cvsps to work and kernel
> CVS is the only fully coherent linearized source of info in open format
> (rest is
Hello,
sorry to annoy you about this, but something is going wrong with either
cvsps or the kernel CVS.
I reproducibly get this as the last changeset, note the date. The
--bkcvs breaks completely too, but that would be a minor issue since
cvsps by default will get it right from the dates that
Hello,
sorry to annoy you about this, but something is going wrong with either
cvsps or the kernel CVS.
I reproducibly get this as the last changeset, note the date. The
--bkcvs breaks completely too, but that would be a minor issue since
cvsps by default will get it right from the dates that
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:42:03PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
Any help is appreciated. I'm just starting to look more seriously into
this since I've some tools that depends on the cvsps to work and kernel
CVS is the only fully coherent linearized source of info in open format
(rest is
Andrea Arcangeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sorry to annoy you about this, but something is going wrong with either
cvsps or the kernel CVS.
I reproducibly get this as the last changeset, note the date. The
--bkcvs breaks completely too, but that would be a minor issue since
cvsps by default
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:58:07AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
FYI, I haven't tried using cvsps on the kernel CVS, but I used to use it on
GCC - and it fell down like this on a constant basis.
Interesting, for me it always worked fine on the kernel until last
month.
You might want to take
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:10:17PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
I noticed this problem some time ago when trying to see whether the
darcs repository is consistent with the BK one:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=110026570201544w=2
A solution is to use the (Logical change
12 matches
Mail list logo
