> And now you have a chutzpah to come and
complain about that? Better yet, we are expected to be working on
fixing those?
Al,
Complaining about something that I can't fix, yep. But asking you to
fix those, nop! That's not my intent. All I'm trying to say is there's
too many out there who don't
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 08:19:46AM +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
> Anyone on lkml working on patches for vmware to make it run on
> Linux-3.10-rc1? The recent change in procfs interface breaks vmware,
> diva/eicon and fio modules.
>
> Every modules is now broken and needs to be reworked. Is there a
Anyone on lkml working on patches for vmware to make it run on
Linux-3.10-rc1? The recent change in procfs interface breaks vmware,
diva/eicon and fio modules.
Every modules is now broken and needs to be reworked. Is there a more
subtle way to handle this like give more time to allow developers
Anyone on lkml working on patches for vmware to make it run on
Linux-3.10-rc1? The recent change in procfs interface breaks vmware,
diva/eicon and fio modules.
Every modules is now broken and needs to be reworked. Is there a more
subtle way to handle this like give more time to allow developers
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 08:19:46AM +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
Anyone on lkml working on patches for vmware to make it run on
Linux-3.10-rc1? The recent change in procfs interface breaks vmware,
diva/eicon and fio modules.
Every modules is now broken and needs to be reworked. Is there a more
And now you have a chutzpah to come and
complain about that? Better yet, we are expected to be working on
fixing those?
Al,
Complaining about something that I can't fix, yep. But asking you to
fix those, nop! That's not my intent. All I'm trying to say is there's
too many out there who don't
6 matches
Mail list logo