Hi,
On 4/14/21 3:51 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Commit
>
> ff57cfaa3d68 ("platform/x86: pmc_atom: Match all Beckhoff Automation
> baytrail boards with critclk_systems DMI table")
>
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.
My bad I somehow forgot to pass -s to "git am",
Hi all,
Commit
ff57cfaa3d68 ("platform/x86: pmc_atom: Match all Beckhoff Automation baytrail
boards with critclk_systems DMI table")
is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpK7vO1nXM1y.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi all,
On 4/8/21 2:13 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Commit
>
> 11cccec79c60 ("genirq: Add IRQF_NO_AUTOEN for request_irq/nmi()")
>
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.
Ugh, thanks for letting me know, this was supposed to come from a merge
from an immutable branch fr
Hi all,
Commit
11cccec79c60 ("genirq: Add IRQF_NO_AUTOEN for request_irq/nmi()")
is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgppsj7QakBNS.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 4:22 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Commit
>
> cc86bb923508 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: fix spelling mistake
> "capabilites" -> "capabilities"")
>
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.
It's fixed now, thanks!
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,
Commit
cc86bb923508 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: fix spelling mistake
"capabilites" -> "capabilities"")
is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpaTqbRpnEU5.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Darren,
On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 09:52:07 -0800 Darren Hart wrote:
>
> Apologies if I've asked you this before... I didn't find it after some
> searching.
>
> We should be catching errors like this before they hit next. First,
> there is no reason we can't catch them - unlike the integration failu
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 01:19:25AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Commit
>
> 9bfe33ba29d0 ("x86/CPU: Add Icelake model number")
>
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.
>
Hi Stephen,
Apologies if I've asked you this before... I didn't find it after some
searching.
W
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 01:19:25AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Commit
>
> 9bfe33ba29d0 ("x86/CPU: Add Icelake model number")
>
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.
Thanks for the catch. Andy, please check your commit scripts as should
definitely be automated in ou
Hi all,
Commit
9bfe33ba29d0 ("x86/CPU: Add Icelake model number")
is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpEWJcWekscX.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Hans,
On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 10:21:40 +0200 Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> On 18-08-18 16:35, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Commit
> >
> >cda5915d15d3 ("platform/x86: touchscreen_dmi: Add info for the Cube
> > KNote i1101 tablet")
>
> For reasons which I do not know youling does
Hi,
On 18-08-18 16:35, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Commit
cda5915d15d3 ("platform/x86: touchscreen_dmi: Add info for the Cube KNote i1101
tablet")
For reasons which I do not know youling does not wish to
use his real name.
So as with the "platform/x86: touchscreen_dmi: Add
info for
Hi all,
Commit
cda5915d15d3 ("platform/x86: touchscreen_dmi: Add info for the Cube KNote
i1101 tablet")
is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpo0vHZOCf_2.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 01:26:46AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 07:38:42 -0700 dvh...@infradead.org wrote:
> >
> > Stephen, are the tests you use available publicly?
>
> I use the script below when I am fetching trees. You don't want the
> "gitk" invocation if you
Hi,
On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 07:38:42 -0700 dvh...@infradead.org wrote:
>
> Stephen, are the tests you use available publicly?
I use the script below when I am fetching trees. You don't want the
"gitk" invocation if you are doing this automatically, of course. The
script just takes a commit range.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:33 PM, wrote:
> On June 1, 2018 5:08:32 AM PDT, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 14:40:35 +0300 Andy Shevchenko
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Oops. What is the proposed fix for that? It seems we can't rebase
>>> published branches.
>>
>>It's unfixable without a rebase
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 14:40:35 +0300 Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
>>
>> Oops. What is the proposed fix for that? It seems we can't rebase
>> published branches.
>
> It's unfixable without a rebase, so you could instead consider it a
On June 1, 2018 5:08:32 AM PDT, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>Hi Andy,
>
>On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 14:40:35 +0300 Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
>>
>> Oops. What is the proposed fix for that? It seems we can't rebase
>> published branches.
>
>It's unfixable without a rebase, so you could instead consider it an
On June 1, 2018 5:08:32 AM PDT, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>Hi Andy,
>
>On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 14:40:35 +0300 Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
>>
>> Oops. What is the proposed fix for that? It seems we can't rebase
>> published branches.
>
>It's unfixable without a rebase, so you could instead consider it an
Hi Andy,
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 14:40:35 +0300 Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> Oops. What is the proposed fix for that? It seems we can't rebase
> published branches.
It's unfixable without a rebase, so you could instead consider it an
opportunity to improve your processes for the future. :-)
--
Cheer
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Commit
>
> bba074f926d1 ("platform/x86: silead_dmi: Add entry for Chuwi Hi8 S806_206
> tablet touchscreen")
>
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
Oops. What is the proposed fix for that? It seems we can't rebase
pu
Hi all,
Commit
bba074f926d1 ("platform/x86: silead_dmi: Add entry for Chuwi Hi8 S806_206
tablet touchscreen")
is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpFtHG0Jixuv.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 02:58:29PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:50:06AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 06:06:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I would say that if y
+Olof and Arnd,
I am curious how you handle the situation below as a maintainer team.
This problem arose from a new for-next test which triggers on the
committer not having a SOB tag in the patch (which can happen when a
shared branch is rebased to drop a patch).
Do you have a branch that you bo
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:50:06AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 06:06:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I would say that if you rebase someone's commit(s), then you are on the
> > > "patch's deliver
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:44:31AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Linus Torvalds writes:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I would say that if you rebase someone's commit(s), then you are on the
> >> "patch's delivery path" and so should add a Signed-of
Linus Torvalds writes:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> I would say that if you rebase someone's commit(s), then you are on the
>> "patch's delivery path" and so should add a Signed-off-by tag.
>
> Yeah, I agree. Rebasing really is pretty much the exact same thi
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 06:06:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > I would say that if you rebase someone's commit(s), then you are on the
> > "patch's delivery path" and so should add a Signed-off-by tag.
>
> Yeah, I agree. Rebasi
Hi Andy,
On Thu, 03 Aug 2017 11:17:03 +0300 Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> I just checked what we have in our for-next branch and mentioned commits
> have mine SoB. Should they have something else?
In Darren's response it became clear that even though you had initially
commited the patches, he had
On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 06:37 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Darren,
>
> Commits
>
> 890f658c101d ("platform/x86: peaq-wmi: silence a static checker
> warning")
> 6d8d55626296 ("platform/x86: msi-wmi: remove unnecessary static in
> msi_wmi_notify()")
> cd0223c64c60 ("platform/x86: ibm_rt
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> I would say that if you rebase someone's commit(s), then you are on the
> "patch's delivery path" and so should add a Signed-off-by tag.
Yeah, I agree. Rebasing really is pretty much the exact same thing as
applying a patch.
> "git reba
Hi Darren,
On Wed, 2 Aug 2017 16:57:40 -0700 Darren Hart wrote:
>
> Is this a new check Stephen?
Yes :-)
> Is there any statement regarding maintainer teams that we must abide by
> this? e.g. any time a rebase in a testing branch is made, the
> maintainer must also ensure a SOB is on each patc
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 06:37:43AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Darren,
>
> Commits
>
> 890f658c101d ("platform/x86: peaq-wmi: silence a static checker warning")
> 6d8d55626296 ("platform/x86: msi-wmi: remove unnecessary static in
> msi_wmi_notify()")
> cd0223c64c60 ("platform/x86:
Hi Darren,
Commits
890f658c101d ("platform/x86: peaq-wmi: silence a static checker warning")
6d8d55626296 ("platform/x86: msi-wmi: remove unnecessary static in
msi_wmi_notify()")
cd0223c64c60 ("platform/x86: ibm_rtl: remove unnecessary static in
ibm_rtl_write()")
are missing Signed-off-b
34 matches
Mail list logo