Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the slave-dma tree

2017-08-28 Thread Vinod Koul 
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 09:10:56AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> Commit
> 
>   966e5e01f420 ("dmaengine: altera: Use macros instead of structs to describe 
> the registers")
> 
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

Oops, missed fixing that up while running with -i :(.

Fixed now, thanks for pointing out

-- 
~Vinod

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the slave-dma tree

2017-08-28 Thread Vinod Koul 
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 09:10:56AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> Commit
> 
>   966e5e01f420 ("dmaengine: altera: Use macros instead of structs to describe 
> the registers")
> 
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

Oops, missed fixing that up while running with -i :(.

Fixed now, thanks for pointing out

-- 
~Vinod

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the slave-dma tree

2017-08-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell 
Hi Vinod,

Commit

  966e5e01f420 ("dmaengine: altera: Use macros instead of structs to describe 
the registers")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the slave-dma tree

2017-08-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell 
Hi Vinod,

Commit

  966e5e01f420 ("dmaengine: altera: Use macros instead of structs to describe 
the registers")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell