linux-next: Tree for Apr 14

2021-04-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20210413: Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 11611 10392 files changed, 569164 insertions(+), 261078 deletions(-) I have created today's linux-next tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 14 (objtool crazy)

2020-05-06 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Randy, On Wed, 6 May 2020 17:13:40 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Yes. It's here: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/02b719674b031800b61e33c30b2e823183627c19.1587842122.git.jpoim...@redhat.com/ Thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell pgp7EXRihOA1K.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 14 (objtool crazy)

2020-05-06 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 5/6/20 3:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:19:14 -0500 Josh Poimboeuf wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 06:50:15AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> On 4/13/20 7:39 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20200413: >>> >>> >>

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 14 (objtool crazy)

2020-05-06 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:19:14 -0500 Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 06:50:15AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 4/13/20 7:39 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20200413: > > > > > > > > > I killed objtool after 49 minutes of CPU t

linux-next: Tree for Apr 14

2016-04-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160413: The mvebu tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The tip tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. The leds tree gained conflicts against the nand tree. The akpm-current tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. No

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 14 (crash due to modpost patch)

2015-04-14 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 06:36:03PM +0200, Quentin Casasnovas wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 09:11:14AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 06:42:44PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: [ ... ] > > It is rude and I'm really sorry about this, I had only tested this on > x86_64 and

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 14 (crash due to modpost patch)

2015-04-14 Thread Quentin Casasnovas
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 09:11:14AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 06:42:44PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Please do not add any v4.2 material to your linux-next included trees > > until after v4.1-rc1 is released. > > > > Changes since 20150413: > > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 14 (crash due to modpost patch)

2015-04-14 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 06:42:44PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Please do not add any v4.2 material to your linux-next included trees > until after v4.1-rc1 is released. > > Changes since 20150413: > > Dropped tree: idle (complex conflict) > > The arm-soc tree still had its buil

linux-next: Tree for Apr 14

2015-04-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any v4.2 material to your linux-next included trees until after v4.1-rc1 is released. Changes since 20150413: Dropped tree: idle (complex conflict) The arm-soc tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. The vfs tree gained conflicts against the ex

linux-next: Tree for Apr 14

2014-04-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree still fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140411: Dropped trees: akpm-current, akpm (too complex conflicts) The powerpc tree still had its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 379 788 files changed, 8145 insertions(+