Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 6 (arch/x86/mm/init_64.c)

2021-04-06 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 09:57:03PM +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 11:39:47AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > Looks like that compound "if" is too much for gcc 7.5.0 to handle: > > > > > > } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) && > > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 6 (arch/x86/mm/init_64.c)

2021-04-06 Thread Oscar Salvador
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 11:39:47AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Looks like that compound "if" is too much for gcc 7.5.0 to handle: > > > > } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) && > >vmemmap_pmd_is_unused(addr, next)) { > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 6 (arch/x86/mm/init_64.c)

2021-04-06 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 4/6/21 11:32 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 4/6/21 5:31 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20210401: >> > > on x86_64: > # CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP is not set > > > gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0 > > > ../arch/x86/mm/init_64.c: In function 'remove_pmd_table': > ../arch/x86/mm/

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 6 (arch/x86/mm/init_64.c)

2021-04-06 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 4/6/21 5:31 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20210401: > on x86_64: # CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP is not set gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0 ../arch/x86/mm/init_64.c: In function 'remove_pmd_table': ../arch/x86/mm/init_64.c:1127:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'vmem

linux-next: Tree for Apr 6

2021-04-06 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20210401: The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The imx-drm tree gained a conflict against the drm tree. The driver-core tree gained a conflict against the devicetree tree. The tty tree gained a conflict against the net-next tree. The scsi-mkp tree ga

linux-next: Tree for Apr 6

2018-04-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any v4.18 destined stuff to your linux-next included trees until after v4.17-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20180405: The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. The parisc-hd tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch. N

linux-next: Tree for Apr 6

2017-04-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170405: The input tree gained a conflict against the jc_docs tree. The mfd tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. The tip tree lost its build failure but gained a conflict against the pstore tree. The staging tree gained conflicts against the v4

linux-next: Tree for Apr 6

2016-04-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160405: Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2369 2200 files changed, 93285 insertions(+), 58570 deletions(-) I have created today's linux-next tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linu