Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 07:26:57PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > which never considers bus to be NULL in __regmap_init. With the > following patch applied, I can boot to a prompt: > > From 031eae5a1b34f952ba3dcaecb4eb4ec9d3bda352 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Marc Zyngier > Date: Mon, 31 Aug

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On 08/31/2015 12:13 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:57:14 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: Hi Marc, On 08/31/2015 11:26 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: [ ... ] Actually, the kernel dies because of this: commit adaac459759db4a1fd35baddbe47bac700095496 Author: Markus Pargmann Date: Sun

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:57:14 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On 08/31/2015 11:26 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > [ ... ] > > > > Actually, the kernel dies because of this: > > > > commit adaac459759db4a1fd35baddbe47bac700095496 > > Author: Markus Pargmann > > Date: Sun Aug 30 09:33:53

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

Hi Marc, On 08/31/2015 11:26 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: [ ... ] Actually, the kernel dies because of this: commit adaac459759db4a1fd35baddbe47bac700095496 Author: Markus Pargmann Date: Sun Aug 30 09:33:53 2015 +0200 regmap: Introduce max_raw_read/write for regmap_bulk_read/write

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On 08/31/2015 10:09 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 09:40:43 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: Hi Marc, On 08/31/2015 09:18 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 08:47:07 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: Hi Marc, On 08/31/2015 08:31 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2015

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:09:22 +0100 Marc Zyngier wrote: Hi Guenter, > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 09:40:43 -0700 > Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > Hi Marc, > > > > On 08/31/2015 09:18 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 08:47:07 -0700 > > > Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Marc, > > >>

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 09:40:43 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On 08/31/2015 09:18 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 08:47:07 -0700 > > Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > >> Hi Marc, > >> > >> On 08/31/2015 08:31 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > >>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:17:36 -0700 >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

Hi Marc, On 08/31/2015 09:18 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 08:47:07 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: Hi Marc, On 08/31/2015 08:31 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:17:36 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: Hi Guenter, Qemu test results: total: 85 pass: 74 fail: 11

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 08:47:07 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On 08/31/2015 08:31 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:17:36 -0700 > > Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > Hi Guenter, > > > >> Qemu test results: > >>total: 85 pass: 74 fail: 11 > >> Failed tests: > >>

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

Hi Marc, On 08/31/2015 08:31 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:17:36 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: Hi Guenter, Qemu test results: total: 85 pass: 74 fail: 11 Failed tests: arm:vexpress-a9:arm_vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:17:36 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: Hi Guenter, > Qemu test results: > total: 85 pass: 74 fail: 11 > Failed tests: > arm:vexpress-a9:arm_vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9 > arm:vexpress-a15:arm_vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1 >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On 8/31/15 7:17 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: s390: kernel/built-in.o: In function `bpf_trace_printk': bpf_trace.c:(.text+0x116a5c): undefined reference to `strncpy_from_unsafe' kernel/built-in.o: In function `fetch_memory_string': trace_kprobe.c:(.text+0x118ee0): undefined reference to

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 07:54:20PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150828: > > I used the h8300 tree from next-20150828 since the current tree has been > rebased onto linux-next :-( > > The sound-asoc tree lost its build failure. > > The trivial tree gained a

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On 8/31/15 7:17 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: s390: kernel/built-in.o: In function `bpf_trace_printk': bpf_trace.c:(.text+0x116a5c): undefined reference to `strncpy_from_unsafe' kernel/built-in.o: In function `fetch_memory_string': trace_kprobe.c:(.text+0x118ee0): undefined reference to

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:17:36 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: Hi Guenter, > Qemu test results: > total: 85 pass: 74 fail: 11 > Failed tests: > arm:vexpress-a9:arm_vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9 > arm:vexpress-a15:arm_vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

Hi Marc, On 08/31/2015 08:31 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:17:36 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: Hi Guenter, Qemu test results: total: 85 pass: 74 fail: 11 Failed tests: arm:vexpress-a9:arm_vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 08:47:07 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On 08/31/2015 08:31 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:17:36 -0700 > > Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > Hi Guenter, > > > >> Qemu test results: > >>total: 85 pass: 74

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

Hi Marc, On 08/31/2015 09:18 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 08:47:07 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: Hi Marc, On 08/31/2015 08:31 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:17:36 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: Hi Guenter, Qemu test

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 09:40:43 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On 08/31/2015 09:18 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 08:47:07 -0700 > > Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > >> Hi Marc, > >> > >> On 08/31/2015 08:31 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:09:22 +0100 Marc Zyngier wrote: Hi Guenter, > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 09:40:43 -0700 > Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > Hi Marc, > > > > On 08/31/2015 09:18 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 08:47:07 -0700 > > > Guenter

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On 08/31/2015 10:09 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 09:40:43 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: Hi Marc, On 08/31/2015 09:18 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 08:47:07 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: Hi Marc, On 08/31/2015 08:31 AM, Marc

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

Hi Marc, On 08/31/2015 11:26 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: [ ... ] Actually, the kernel dies because of this: commit adaac459759db4a1fd35baddbe47bac700095496 Author: Markus Pargmann Date: Sun Aug 30 09:33:53 2015 +0200 regmap: Introduce max_raw_read/write for

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:57:14 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On 08/31/2015 11:26 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > [ ... ] > > > > Actually, the kernel dies because of this: > > > > commit adaac459759db4a1fd35baddbe47bac700095496 > > Author: Markus Pargmann

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On 08/31/2015 12:13 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:57:14 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: Hi Marc, On 08/31/2015 11:26 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: [ ... ] Actually, the kernel dies because of this: commit adaac459759db4a1fd35baddbe47bac700095496 Author: Markus

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 07:26:57PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > which never considers bus to be NULL in __regmap_init. With the > following patch applied, I can boot to a prompt: > > From 031eae5a1b34f952ba3dcaecb4eb4ec9d3bda352 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Marc Zyngier

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 07:54:20PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150828: > > I used the h8300 tree from next-20150828 since the current tree has been > rebased onto linux-next :-( > > The sound-asoc tree lost its build failure. > > The trivial tree gained a