Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 11

2021-02-12 Thread Heiko Carstens
Hi Vlad, > > Build fails on s390 using defconfig with: > > > > In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.h:40, > > from drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c:45: > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.h:24:29: error: field > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 11

2021-02-12 Thread Vlad Buslov
On Thu 11 Feb 2021 at 22:30, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:26:04PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20210210: >> >> The powerpc tree still had its build failure in the allyesconfig for >> which I applied a supplied patch. >> >> The v4l-dvb tree

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 11

2021-02-11 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:26:04PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20210210: > > The powerpc tree still had its build failure in the allyesconfig for > which I applied a supplied patch. > > The v4l-dvb tree lost its build failure. > > The drm-misc tree lost its build

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 11 (drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.o)

2021-02-11 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 2/11/21 3:26 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20210210: > > The powerpc tree still had its build failure in the allyesconfig for > which I applied a supplied patch. > > The v4l-dvb tree lost its build failure. > > The drm-misc tree lost its build failure. > > The

linux-next: Tree for Feb 11

2021-02-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20210210: The powerpc tree still had its build failure in the allyesconfig for which I applied a supplied patch. The v4l-dvb tree lost its build failure. The drm-misc tree lost its build failure. The modules tree lost its build failure. The device-mapper tree gained a

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 11 (wireless/80211)

2019-02-13 Thread Johannes Berg
Thanks for the heads-up, Randy. We'd seen separate build bot reports on this as well. > ERROR: "__umoddi3" [net/wireless/cfg80211.ko] undefined! > ERROR: "__umoddi3" [net/mac80211/mac80211.ko] undefined! Should be fixed as of yesterday, let me know if it reappears. johannes

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 11 (wireless/80211)

2019-02-11 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 2/10/19 11:39 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20190208: > on i386: ERROR: "__umoddi3" [net/wireless/cfg80211.ko] undefined! ERROR: "__umoddi3" [net/mac80211/mac80211.ko] undefined! -- ~Randy

linux-next: Tree for Feb 11

2019-02-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190208: The drm-misc tree still has its build failure so I used a supplied merge fix patch. The apparmor tree lost its build failure. The phy-next tree gained conflicts against the net-next tree. The scsi-mkp tree gained conflicts against Linus' and the block trees.

linux-next: Tree for Feb 11

2016-02-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160210: The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The drm-misc tree lost its build failure. The trivial tree gained a build fix from the akpm tree. The aio tree still had a build failure so I used the version from next-20160111. The akpm tree lost a

linux-next: Tree for Feb 11

2016-02-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160210: The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The drm-misc tree lost its build failure. The trivial tree gained a build fix from the akpm tree. The aio tree still had a build failure so I used the version from next-20160111. The akpm tree lost a

linux-next: Tree for Feb 11

2015-02-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any material destined for v3.21 to your linux-next included trees until after v3.20-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20150210: The pm tree gained a conflict against the pci tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 8078 7762 files changed, 339153

linux-next: Tree for Feb 11

2015-02-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any material destined for v3.21 to your linux-next included trees until after v3.20-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20150210: The pm tree gained a conflict against the pci tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 8078 7762 files changed, 339153

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 11 (staging/rtl8821ae/)

2014-02-11 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:14:52AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 02/10/2014 10:21 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. > > > > Changes since 20140210: > > > > on i386: > > ERROR: "ieee80211_rx_irqsafe"

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 11 (staging/rtl8821ae/)

2014-02-11 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 02/10/2014 10:21 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. > > Changes since 20140210: > on i386: ERROR: "ieee80211_rx_irqsafe" [drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rtl8821ae.ko] undefined! ERROR: "ieee80211_beacon_get_tim"

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 11 (staging/rtl8821ae/)

2014-02-11 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 02/10/2014 10:21 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140210: on i386: ERROR: ieee80211_rx_irqsafe [drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rtl8821ae.ko] undefined! ERROR: ieee80211_beacon_get_tim

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 11 (staging/rtl8821ae/)

2014-02-11 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:14:52AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 02/10/2014 10:21 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140210: on i386: ERROR: ieee80211_rx_irqsafe

linux-next: Tree for Feb 11

2014-02-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140210: The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The mfd-lj tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20140210. The tip tree gained a build failure so I used the version from

linux-next: Tree for Feb 11

2014-02-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140210: The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The mfd-lj tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20140210. The tip tree gained a build failure so I used the version from

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 11 (intel_pstate.c)

2013-02-11 Thread Dirk Brandewie
On 02/11/2013 08:18 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 02/10/13 23:47, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20130208: on i386: drivers/built-in.o: In function `intel_pstate_timer_func': intel_pstate.c:(.text+0x4ce97e): undefined reference to `__udivdi3' drivers/built-in.o: In function

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 11 (intel_pstate.c)

2013-02-11 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 02/10/13 23:47, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130208: > on i386: drivers/built-in.o: In function `intel_pstate_timer_func': intel_pstate.c:(.text+0x4ce97e): undefined reference to `__udivdi3' drivers/built-in.o: In function `intel_pstate_cpu_init':

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 11 (intel_pstate.c)

2013-02-11 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 02/10/13 23:47, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20130208: on i386: drivers/built-in.o: In function `intel_pstate_timer_func': intel_pstate.c:(.text+0x4ce97e): undefined reference to `__udivdi3' drivers/built-in.o: In function `intel_pstate_cpu_init':

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 11 (intel_pstate.c)

2013-02-11 Thread Dirk Brandewie
On 02/11/2013 08:18 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 02/10/13 23:47, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20130208: on i386: drivers/built-in.o: In function `intel_pstate_timer_func': intel_pstate.c:(.text+0x4ce97e): undefined reference to `__udivdi3' drivers/built-in.o: In function