Hi all,
Changes since 20210216:
The pm tree gained a conflict against the i3c tree.
The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net tree.
The tip tree gained a conflict against the pm tree.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 10598
10682 files changed, 464339 insertions(+),
Hi all,
Changes since 20170216:
The powerpc tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The tip tree gained conflicts against the drm, kspp, openrisc and
powerpc trees.
The akpm-current tree gained conflicts against the kspp and tip trees.
I dropped 3 patches from the akpm tree that turned up
Hi all,
Changes since 20170216:
The powerpc tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The tip tree gained conflicts against the drm, kspp, openrisc and
powerpc trees.
The akpm-current tree gained conflicts against the kspp and tip trees.
I dropped 3 patches from the akpm tree that turned up
On Wednesday 17 February 2016 11:07 PM, David Daney wrote:
On 02/17/2016 03:52 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 04:39:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20160216:
since last few days build of mips cavium_octeon_defconfig is failing
with the error:
On Wednesday 17 February 2016 11:07 PM, David Daney wrote:
On 02/17/2016 03:52 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 04:39:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20160216:
since last few days build of mips cavium_octeon_defconfig is failing
with the error:
On 02/17/2016 03:52 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 04:39:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20160216:
since last few days build of mips cavium_octeon_defconfig is failing
with the error:
arch/mips/include/asm/octeon/cvmx.h:60:39: fatal error:
On 02/17/2016 03:52 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 04:39:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20160216:
since last few days build of mips cavium_octeon_defconfig is failing
with the error:
arch/mips/include/asm/octeon/cvmx.h:60:39: fatal error:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 04:39:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20160216:
since last few days build of mips cavium_octeon_defconfig is failing
with the error:
arch/mips/include/asm/octeon/cvmx.h:60:39: fatal error:
asm/octeon/cvmx-ciu3-defs.h: No such file
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 04:39:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20160216:
since last few days build of mips cavium_octeon_defconfig is failing
with the error:
arch/mips/include/asm/octeon/cvmx.h:60:39: fatal error:
asm/octeon/cvmx-ciu3-defs.h: No such file
Hi all,
Changes since 20160216:
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The crypto tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20160216.
The clockevents tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The gpio tree lost its build failure.
The aio tree still had
Hi all,
Changes since 20160216:
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The crypto tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20160216.
The clockevents tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The gpio tree lost its build failure.
The aio tree still had
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 05:54:57AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 02/18/2015 01:14 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 07:37:40AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi Guenter,
> >>
> >> [Add Ralf to cc]
> >>
> >> On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:20:36 -0800 Guenter Roeck
> >> wrote:
On 02/18/2015 01:14 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 07:37:40AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Guenter,
[Add Ralf to cc]
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:20:36 -0800 Guenter Roeck wrote:
Build results:
total: 121 pass: 109 fail: 12
Failed builds:
mips:defconfig
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 07:37:40AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> [Add Ralf to cc]
>
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:20:36 -0800 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> > Build results:
> > total: 121 pass: 109 fail: 12
> > Failed builds:
> > mips:defconfig
> > mips:allmodconfig
> >
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 07:37:40AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Guenter,
[Add Ralf to cc]
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:20:36 -0800 Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
Build results:
total: 121 pass: 109 fail: 12
Failed builds:
mips:defconfig
mips:allmodconfig
On 02/18/2015 01:14 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 07:37:40AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Guenter,
[Add Ralf to cc]
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:20:36 -0800 Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
Build results:
total: 121 pass: 109 fail: 12
Failed builds:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 05:54:57AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 02/18/2015 01:14 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 07:37:40AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Guenter,
[Add Ralf to cc]
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:20:36 -0800 Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net
wrote:
Hi Wolfram,
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:11:58PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Randy,
>
> thanks for the report!
>
> > I suppose someone could make that:
> >
> > depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM && IOSF_MBI=y && ACPI
> >
> > or even make I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL be a tristate symbol.
>
>
Hi Guenter,
[Add Ralf to cc]
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:20:36 -0800 Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> Build results:
> total: 121 pass: 109 fail: 12
> Failed builds:
> mips:defconfig
> mips:allmodconfig
> mips:bcm47xx_defconfig
> mips:bcm63xx_defconfig
>
Randy,
thanks for the report!
> I suppose someone could make that:
>
> depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM && IOSF_MBI=y && ACPI
>
> or even make I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL be a tristate symbol.
I'll wait a day for input from David what he prefers, because I don't
own/know this platform. If
On 02/16/15 21:02, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please do not add any material destined for v3.21 to your linux-next
> included trees until after v3.20-rc1 has been released.
>
> Changes since 20150216:
>
on i386, when CONFIG_IOSF_MBI=m and
CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL=y:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 04:02:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please do not add any material destined for v3.21 to your linux-next
> included trees until after v3.20-rc1 has been released.
>
> Changes since 20150216:
>
> The slave-dma tree lost its build failure.
>
>
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 04:02:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Please do not add any material destined for v3.21 to your linux-next
included trees until after v3.20-rc1 has been released.
Changes since 20150216:
The slave-dma tree lost its build failure.
Non-merge commits
Hi Guenter,
[Add Ralf to cc]
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:20:36 -0800 Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
Build results:
total: 121 pass: 109 fail: 12
Failed builds:
mips:defconfig
mips:allmodconfig
mips:bcm47xx_defconfig
mips:bcm63xx_defconfig
On 02/16/15 21:02, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Please do not add any material destined for v3.21 to your linux-next
included trees until after v3.20-rc1 has been released.
Changes since 20150216:
on i386, when CONFIG_IOSF_MBI=m and
CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL=y:
Randy,
thanks for the report!
I suppose someone could make that:
depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM IOSF_MBI=y ACPI
or even make I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL be a tristate symbol.
I'll wait a day for input from David what he prefers, because I don't
own/know this platform. If there is
Hi Wolfram,
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:11:58PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Randy,
thanks for the report!
I suppose someone could make that:
depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM IOSF_MBI=y ACPI
or even make I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL be a tristate symbol.
I'll wait a day for
Hi all,
Please do not add any material destined for v3.21 to your linux-next
included trees until after v3.20-rc1 has been released.
Changes since 20150216:
The slave-dma tree lost its build failure.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2980
2871 files changed, 124415 insertions(+),
Hi all,
Please do not add any material destined for v3.21 to your linux-next
included trees until after v3.20-rc1 has been released.
Changes since 20150216:
The slave-dma tree lost its build failure.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2980
2871 files changed, 124415 insertions(+),
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Bjorn Andersson
wrote:
> This comes from the request of having everything as a module, to reduce the
> size of the multi-platform ARM builds. I would say that the important part
> related to that would be to keep the platform specific tables in modules.
>
> But
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:14:45AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Without too much effort, I can get this to fail just by making
> CONFIG_PINCTRL_MSM=m. handle_bad_irq isn't marked EXPORT_SYMBOL*, so
> hence the warning.
>
> Whether or not
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Josh Cartwright jo...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:14:45AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
Without too much effort, I can get this to fail just by making
CONFIG_PINCTRL_MSM=m. handle_bad_irq isn't marked EXPORT_SYMBOL*, so
hence the warning.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Bjorn Andersson
bjorn.anders...@sonymobile.com wrote:
This comes from the request of having everything as a module, to reduce the
size of the multi-platform ARM builds. I would say that the important part
related to that would be to keep the platform specific
On Mon 24 Feb 10:41 PST 2014, Josh Cartwright wrote:
[...]
>
> Without too much effort, I can get this to fail just by making
> CONFIG_PINCTRL_MSM=m. handle_bad_irq isn't marked EXPORT_SYMBOL*, so
> hence the warning.
>
Ohh, yeah I missed that.
> Whether or not this is intentional is not
On 02/24/2014 10:41 AM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:14:45AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 02/24/2014 09:46 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> On Mon 24 Feb 06:46 PST 2014, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap
wrote:
> On
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:14:45AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 02/24/2014 09:46 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Mon 24 Feb 06:46 PST 2014, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> ERROR:
On 02/24/2014 09:46 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 24 Feb 06:46 PST 2014, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
If you see failures in building this tree due to missing
On Mon 24 Feb 06:46 PST 2014, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> If you see failures in building this tree due to missing declarations of
> >> k..alloc/free, then it may be caused
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> If you see failures in building this tree due to missing declarations of
>> k..alloc/free, then it may be caused by commit 2bd59d48ebfb ("cgroup:
>> convert to kernfs"). Please
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote:
On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
If you see failures in building this tree due to missing declarations of
k..alloc/free, then it may be caused by commit 2bd59d48ebfb (cgroup:
convert to kernfs).
On Mon 24 Feb 06:46 PST 2014, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote:
On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
If you see failures in building this tree due to missing declarations of
k..alloc/free, then it may be
On 02/24/2014 09:46 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Mon 24 Feb 06:46 PST 2014, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote:
On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
If you see failures in building this tree due to missing
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:14:45AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 02/24/2014 09:46 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Mon 24 Feb 06:46 PST 2014, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org
wrote:
On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On 02/24/2014 10:41 AM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:14:45AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 02/24/2014 09:46 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Mon 24 Feb 06:46 PST 2014, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org
wrote:
On
On Mon 24 Feb 10:41 PST 2014, Josh Cartwright wrote:
[...]
Without too much effort, I can get this to fail just by making
CONFIG_PINCTRL_MSM=m. handle_bad_irq isn't marked EXPORT_SYMBOL*, so
hence the warning.
Ohh, yeah I missed that.
Whether or not this is intentional is not clear.
On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If you see failures in building this tree due to missing declarations of
> k..alloc/free, then it may be caused by commit 2bd59d48ebfb ("cgroup:
> convert to kernfs"). Please send Tejun Heo a patch
> adding an inclusion of
On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
If you see failures in building this tree due to missing declarations of
k..alloc/free, then it may be caused by commit 2bd59d48ebfb (cgroup:
convert to kernfs). Please send Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org a patch
adding an inclusion of
Hi all,
If you see failures in building this tree due to missing declarations of
k..alloc/free, then it may be caused by commit 2bd59d48ebfb ("cgroup:
convert to kernfs"). Please send Tejun Heo a patch
adding an inclusion of linux/slab.h to the appropriate file(s).
This tree fails (more than
Hi all,
If you see failures in building this tree due to missing declarations of
k..alloc/free, then it may be caused by commit 2bd59d48ebfb (cgroup:
convert to kernfs). Please send Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org a patch
adding an inclusion of linux/slab.h to the appropriate file(s).
This tree fails
49 matches
Mail list logo
