Hi all,
Changes since 20210114:
The drm tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
next-20210107.
The amdgpu tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. It also gained
a build failure for which I disabled CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU.
The drm-intel tree still had its build failure from
Hi all,
Changes since 20190114:
The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch.
The mali-dp tree lost its build failure but gained another for which
I applied a merge fix patch.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1856
1927 files changed, 62318 insertions(+),
Hi,
Arnd had sent a patch to fix this issue,
please refer to : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10155685
thanks
On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 11:34 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 01/14/2018 09:44 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20180112:
> >
>
> on i386:
>
>
Hi,
Arnd had sent a patch to fix this issue,
please refer to : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10155685
thanks
On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 11:34 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 01/14/2018 09:44 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20180112:
> >
>
> on i386:
>
>
On 01/14/2018 09:44 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20180112:
>
on i386:
../drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_plat.c: In function 'mtu3_suspend':
../drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_plat.c:462:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'ssusb_wakeup_set'
On 01/14/2018 09:44 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20180112:
>
on i386:
../drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_plat.c: In function 'mtu3_suspend':
../drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_plat.c:462:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'ssusb_wakeup_set'
Hi all,
Changes since 20180112:
The arm64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The f2fs tree gained a conflict against the fscrypt tree.
The net-next tree lost its build failure and gained a conflict against
the net tree.
The bpf-next tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The
Hi all,
Changes since 20180112:
The arm64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The f2fs tree gained a conflict against the fscrypt tree.
The net-next tree lost its build failure and gained a conflict against
the net tree.
The bpf-next tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The
Hi all,
Changes since 20150114:
The renesas tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2952
2909 files changed, 90289 insertions(+), 49341 deletions(-)
Hi all,
Changes since 20150114:
The renesas tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2952
2909 files changed, 90289 insertions(+), 49341 deletions(-)
On 01/14/2014 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build.
>
> Changes since 20140114:
>
on x86_64:
# CONFIG_IPV6 is not enabled.
warning: (NF_TABLES_INET) selects NF_TABLES_IPV6 which has unmet direct
dependencies (NET &&
Hi Stephen,
Am Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2014, 07:50:25 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:39:03 +0100 Richard Weinberger
wrote:
> > Stephen, can you please add my UML tree to -next?
> > It contains already the fix.
> >
Hi Richard,
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:39:03 +0100 Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
> Stephen, can you please add my UML tree to -next?
> It contains already the fix.
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rw/uml.git next
Sure, added from today. As long as it only contains stuff for v3.14 ...
Am Mittwoch, 15. Januar 2014, 08:21:37 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> On 01/14/2014 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build.
>
> > Changes since 20140114:
> on i386 and/or x86_64 defconfigs:
>
> CC
On 01/14/2014 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build.
>
> Changes since 20140114:
>
on i386 and/or x86_64 defconfigs:
CC arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.s
In file included from include/linux/sched.h:43:0,
On 01/14/2014 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build.
Changes since 20140114:
on i386 and/or x86_64 defconfigs:
CC arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.s
In file included from include/linux/sched.h:43:0,
Am Mittwoch, 15. Januar 2014, 08:21:37 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
On 01/14/2014 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build.
Changes since 20140114:
on i386 and/or x86_64 defconfigs:
CC arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.s
Hi Richard,
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:39:03 +0100 Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at wrote:
Stephen, can you please add my UML tree to -next?
It contains already the fix.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rw/uml.git next
Sure, added from today. As long as it only contains stuff for
Hi Stephen,
Am Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2014, 07:50:25 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
Hi Richard,
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:39:03 +0100 Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at
wrote:
Stephen, can you please add my UML tree to -next?
It contains already the fix.
On 01/14/2014 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build.
Changes since 20140114:
on x86_64:
# CONFIG_IPV6 is not enabled.
warning: (NF_TABLES_INET) selects NF_TABLES_IPV6 which has unmet direct
dependencies (NET INET
Hi all,
This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build.
Changes since 20140114:
Dropped tree: sh (complex merge conflicts against very old commits)
Removed tree: pstore (at maintainer's request)
The powerpc tree still had its build failure.
The net-next tree gained a
Hi all,
This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build.
Changes since 20140114:
Dropped tree: sh (complex merge conflicts against very old commits)
Removed tree: pstore (at maintainer's request)
The powerpc tree still had its build failure.
The net-next tree gained a
Hi all,
Changes since 20130114:
Dropped tree: samung (many conflicts)
The powerpc tree still had its build failures.
The pm tree lost its build failure.
The akpm tree gained a conflict against the block tree.
I
Hi all,
Changes since 20130114:
Dropped tree: samung (many conflicts)
The powerpc tree still had its build failures.
The pm tree lost its build failure.
The akpm tree gained a conflict against the block tree.
I
24 matches
Mail list logo