linux-next: Tree for Jan 15

2021-01-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20210114: The drm tree still had its build failure so I used the version from next-20210107. The amdgpu tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. It also gained a build failure for which I disabled CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU. The drm-intel tree still had its build failure from

linux-next: Tree for Jan 15

2019-01-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190114: The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. The mali-dp tree lost its build failure but gained another for which I applied a merge fix patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1856 1927 files changed, 62318 insertions(+),

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 15 (drivers/usb/mtu3/)

2018-01-15 Thread Chunfeng Yun
Hi, Arnd had sent a patch to fix this issue, please refer to : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10155685 thanks On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 11:34 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 01/14/2018 09:44 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20180112: > > > > on i386: > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 15 (drivers/usb/mtu3/)

2018-01-15 Thread Chunfeng Yun
Hi, Arnd had sent a patch to fix this issue, please refer to : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10155685 thanks On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 11:34 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 01/14/2018 09:44 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20180112: > > > > on i386: > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 15 (drivers/usb/mtu3/)

2018-01-15 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 01/14/2018 09:44 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20180112: > on i386: ../drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_plat.c: In function 'mtu3_suspend': ../drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_plat.c:462:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ssusb_wakeup_set'

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 15 (drivers/usb/mtu3/)

2018-01-15 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 01/14/2018 09:44 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20180112: > on i386: ../drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_plat.c: In function 'mtu3_suspend': ../drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_plat.c:462:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ssusb_wakeup_set'

linux-next: Tree for Jan 15

2018-01-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180112: The arm64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The f2fs tree gained a conflict against the fscrypt tree. The net-next tree lost its build failure and gained a conflict against the net tree. The bpf-next tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The

linux-next: Tree for Jan 15

2018-01-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180112: The arm64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The f2fs tree gained a conflict against the fscrypt tree. The net-next tree lost its build failure and gained a conflict against the net tree. The bpf-next tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The

linux-next: Tree for Jan 15

2015-01-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150114: The renesas tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2952 2909 files changed, 90289 insertions(+), 49341 deletions(-)

linux-next: Tree for Jan 15

2015-01-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150114: The renesas tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2952 2909 files changed, 90289 insertions(+), 49341 deletions(-)

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 15 (netfilter: nft_reject)

2014-01-15 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 01/14/2014 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. > > Changes since 20140114: > on x86_64: # CONFIG_IPV6 is not enabled. warning: (NF_TABLES_INET) selects NF_TABLES_IPV6 which has unmet direct dependencies (NET &&

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 15 (um, rcu)

2014-01-15 Thread Richard Weinberger
Hi Stephen, Am Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2014, 07:50:25 schrieb Stephen Rothwell: > Hi Richard, > > On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:39:03 +0100 Richard Weinberger wrote: > > Stephen, can you please add my UML tree to -next? > > It contains already the fix. > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 15 (um, rcu)

2014-01-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Richard, On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:39:03 +0100 Richard Weinberger wrote: > > Stephen, can you please add my UML tree to -next? > It contains already the fix. > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rw/uml.git next Sure, added from today. As long as it only contains stuff for v3.14 ...

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 15 (um, rcu)

2014-01-15 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am Mittwoch, 15. Januar 2014, 08:21:37 schrieb Randy Dunlap: > On 01/14/2014 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. > > > Changes since 20140114: > on i386 and/or x86_64 defconfigs: > > CC

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 15 (um, rcu)

2014-01-15 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 01/14/2014 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. > > Changes since 20140114: > on i386 and/or x86_64 defconfigs: CC arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.s In file included from include/linux/sched.h:43:0,

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 15 (um, rcu)

2014-01-15 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 01/14/2014 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140114: on i386 and/or x86_64 defconfigs: CC arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.s In file included from include/linux/sched.h:43:0,

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 15 (um, rcu)

2014-01-15 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am Mittwoch, 15. Januar 2014, 08:21:37 schrieb Randy Dunlap: On 01/14/2014 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140114: on i386 and/or x86_64 defconfigs: CC arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.s

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 15 (um, rcu)

2014-01-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Richard, On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:39:03 +0100 Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at wrote: Stephen, can you please add my UML tree to -next? It contains already the fix. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rw/uml.git next Sure, added from today. As long as it only contains stuff for

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 15 (um, rcu)

2014-01-15 Thread Richard Weinberger
Hi Stephen, Am Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2014, 07:50:25 schrieb Stephen Rothwell: Hi Richard, On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:39:03 +0100 Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at wrote: Stephen, can you please add my UML tree to -next? It contains already the fix.

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 15 (netfilter: nft_reject)

2014-01-15 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 01/14/2014 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140114: on x86_64: # CONFIG_IPV6 is not enabled. warning: (NF_TABLES_INET) selects NF_TABLES_IPV6 which has unmet direct dependencies (NET INET

linux-next: Tree for Jan 15

2014-01-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140114: Dropped tree: sh (complex merge conflicts against very old commits) Removed tree: pstore (at maintainer's request) The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The net-next tree gained a

linux-next: Tree for Jan 15

2014-01-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140114: Dropped tree: sh (complex merge conflicts against very old commits) Removed tree: pstore (at maintainer's request) The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The net-next tree gained a

linux-next: Tree for Jan 15

2013-01-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20130114: Dropped tree: samung (many conflicts) The powerpc tree still had its build failures. The pm tree lost its build failure. The akpm tree gained a conflict against the block tree. I

linux-next: Tree for Jan 15

2013-01-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20130114: Dropped tree: samung (many conflicts) The powerpc tree still had its build failures. The pm tree lost its build failure. The akpm tree gained a conflict against the block tree. I