linux-next: Tree for Jul 8

Hi all, Changes since 20200707: New tree: set_fs My fixes tree contains: dbf24e30ce2e ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning") b236d81d9e4f ("powerpc/boot/dts: Fix dtc "pciex" warnings") The kbuild tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. The f2fs tree

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 8 --> bootup failure on s390x (bisected)

On 08.07.19 20:06, Al Viro wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 06:52:14PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > >> smp: Brought up 1 node, 1 CPU >> Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference in virtual kernel address space >> Failing address: 3a07 TEID: 3a070407 >> Fault in

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 8 --> bootup failure on s390x (bisected)

On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 06:52:14PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > smp: Brought up 1 node, 1 CPU > Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference in virtual kernel address space > Failing address: 3a07 TEID: 3a070407 > Fault in home space mode while using kernel ASCE. >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 8 --> bootup failure on s390x (bisected)

Al, linux-next July 8th fails to bootup on s390x (linux-next from July 4th did still work) [...] smp: Brought up 1 node, 1 CPU Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference in virtual kernel address space Failing address: 3a07 TEID: 3a070407 Fault in home space mode while

linux-next: Tree for Jul 8

Hi all, Changes since 20190705: The kbuild tree lost its build failure. The vfs tree gained a conflict against the nfsd tree. The jc_docs tree gained a conflict against the vfs tree. The rdma tree lost its build failures but gained another so I used the version from next-20190628. The

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 8

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 06:03:38PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160707: > > New trees: netfilter and netfilter-next > > The drm-msm tree gained a conflict against the arm tree. > > The block tree gained conflicts against Linus' and the btrfs-kdave trees. > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 8

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 06:03:38PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160707: > > New trees: netfilter and netfilter-next > > The drm-msm tree gained a conflict against the arm tree. > > The block tree gained conflicts against Linus' and the btrfs-kdave trees. > >

linux-next: Tree for Jul 8

Hi all, Changes since 20160707: New trees: netfilter and netfilter-next The drm-msm tree gained a conflict against the arm tree. The block tree gained conflicts against Linus' and the btrfs-kdave trees. The userns tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. Non-merge commits (relative to

linux-next: Tree for Jul 8

Hi all, Changes since 20160707: New trees: netfilter and netfilter-next The drm-msm tree gained a conflict against the arm tree. The block tree gained conflicts against Linus' and the btrfs-kdave trees. The userns tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. Non-merge commits (relative to

linux-next: Tree for Jul 8

Hi all, Changes since 20150707: Renamed trees: powerpc-merge to powerpc-merge-benh powerpc to powerpc-benh New trees: powerpc-fixes and powerpc The tip tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20150707. The vhost tree gaiend a conflict against Linus' tree.

linux-next: Tree for Jul 8

Hi all, Changes since 20150707: Renamed trees: powerpc-merge to powerpc-merge-benh powerpc to powerpc-benh New trees: powerpc-fixes and powerpc The tip tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20150707. The vhost tree gaiend a conflict against Linus' tree.

linux-next: Tree for Jul 8

Hi all, Changes since 20140707: My fixes tree contains: powerpc: Disable RELOCATABLE for COMPILE_TEST with PPC64 The net tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. The regulator tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20140707. The iommu tree

linux-next: Tree for Jul 8

Hi all, Changes since 20140707: My fixes tree contains: powerpc: Disable RELOCATABLE for COMPILE_TEST with PPC64 The net tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. The regulator tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20140707. The iommu tree

linux-next: Tree for Jul 8

Hi all, Changes since 20130705: The v4l-dvb tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. The pm tree lost its build failure. The vhost tree gained a conflict against the target-updates tree. The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The akpm tree gained a conflict

linux-next: Tree for Jul 8

Hi all, Changes since 20130705: The v4l-dvb tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. The pm tree lost its build failure. The vhost tree gained a conflict against the target-updates tree. The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The akpm tree gained a conflict