Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:43:59 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 08/19/2012 07:51 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:41:42 -0700, Randy Dunlap > > wrote: > >> On 08/14/2012 08:17 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > >> > >>> Am 14.08.2012 17:15, schrieb David Howells: > How about this then? > > David > --- > diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig > index 9926e11..a4b0c10 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig > @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ config 64BIT > config X86_32 > def_bool !64BIT > select HAVE_AOUT > +select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL > > config X86_64 > def_bool 64BIT > +select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA > > config RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM > def_bool X86_XADD && 64BIT > >>> > >>> Looks sane. > >>> > >>> Acked-by: Richard Weinberger > >> > >> > >> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap > > > > Thanks, folded into David's original patch. > > > When will this be fixed in linux-next? > > linux-next of 20120821 still fails. Should be in latest, ie. 20120822. Cheers, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
On 08/19/2012 07:51 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:41:42 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 08/14/2012 08:17 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> >>> Am 14.08.2012 17:15, schrieb David Howells: How about this then? David --- diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig index 9926e11..a4b0c10 100644 --- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ config 64BIT config X86_32 def_bool !64BIT select HAVE_AOUT + select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL config X86_64 def_bool 64BIT + select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA config RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM def_bool X86_XADD && 64BIT >>> >>> Looks sane. >>> >>> Acked-by: Richard Weinberger >> >> >> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap > > Thanks, folded into David's original patch. When will this be fixed in linux-next? linux-next of 20120821 still fails. thanks, -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:43:59 -0700, Randy Dunlap rdun...@xenotime.net wrote: On 08/19/2012 07:51 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:41:42 -0700, Randy Dunlap rdun...@xenotime.net wrote: On 08/14/2012 08:17 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am 14.08.2012 17:15, schrieb David Howells: How about this then? David --- diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig index 9926e11..a4b0c10 100644 --- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ config 64BIT config X86_32 def_bool !64BIT select HAVE_AOUT +select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL config X86_64 def_bool 64BIT +select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA config RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM def_bool X86_XADD 64BIT Looks sane. Acked-by: Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at Acked-by: Randy Dunlap rdun...@xenotime.net Thanks, folded into David's original patch. When will this be fixed in linux-next? linux-next of 20120821 still fails. Should be in latest, ie. 20120822. Cheers, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
On 08/19/2012 07:51 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:41:42 -0700, Randy Dunlap rdun...@xenotime.net wrote: On 08/14/2012 08:17 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am 14.08.2012 17:15, schrieb David Howells: How about this then? David --- diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig index 9926e11..a4b0c10 100644 --- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ config 64BIT config X86_32 def_bool !64BIT select HAVE_AOUT + select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL config X86_64 def_bool 64BIT + select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA config RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM def_bool X86_XADD 64BIT Looks sane. Acked-by: Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at Acked-by: Randy Dunlap rdun...@xenotime.net Thanks, folded into David's original patch. When will this be fixed in linux-next? linux-next of 20120821 still fails. thanks, -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:41:42 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 08/14/2012 08:17 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > > Am 14.08.2012 17:15, schrieb David Howells: > >> How about this then? > >> > >> David > >> --- > >> diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig > >> index 9926e11..a4b0c10 100644 > >> --- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig > >> +++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig > >> @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ config 64BIT > >> config X86_32 > >>def_bool !64BIT > >>select HAVE_AOUT > >> + select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL > >> > >> config X86_64 > >>def_bool 64BIT > >> + select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA > >> > >> config RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM > >>def_bool X86_XADD && 64BIT > > > > Looks sane. > > > > Acked-by: Richard Weinberger > > > Acked-by: Randy Dunlap Thanks, folded into David's original patch. Cheers, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:41:42 -0700, Randy Dunlap rdun...@xenotime.net wrote: On 08/14/2012 08:17 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am 14.08.2012 17:15, schrieb David Howells: How about this then? David --- diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig index 9926e11..a4b0c10 100644 --- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ config 64BIT config X86_32 def_bool !64BIT select HAVE_AOUT + select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL config X86_64 def_bool 64BIT + select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA config RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM def_bool X86_XADD 64BIT Looks sane. Acked-by: Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at Acked-by: Randy Dunlap rdun...@xenotime.net Thanks, folded into David's original patch. Cheers, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
On 08/14/2012 08:17 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 14.08.2012 17:15, schrieb David Howells: >> How about this then? >> >> David >> --- >> diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig >> index 9926e11..a4b0c10 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig >> @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ config 64BIT >> config X86_32 >> def_bool !64BIT >> select HAVE_AOUT >> +select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL >> >> config X86_64 >> def_bool 64BIT >> +select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA >> >> config RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM >> def_bool X86_XADD && 64BIT > > Looks sane. > > Acked-by: Richard Weinberger Acked-by: Randy Dunlap Thanks. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
Am 14.08.2012 17:15, schrieb David Howells: > How about this then? > > David > --- > diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig > index 9926e11..a4b0c10 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig > @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ config 64BIT > config X86_32 > def_bool !64BIT > select HAVE_AOUT > + select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL > > config X86_64 > def_bool 64BIT > + select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA > > config RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM > def_bool X86_XADD && 64BIT Looks sane. Acked-by: Richard Weinberger Thanks, //richard signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
How about this then? David --- diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig index 9926e11..a4b0c10 100644 --- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ config 64BIT config X86_32 def_bool !64BIT select HAVE_AOUT + select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL config X86_64 def_bool 64BIT + select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA config RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM def_bool X86_XADD && 64BIT -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
David Howells wrote: > > I think arch/x86/um/Kconfig makes more sense. > ... > It doesn't exist. Should I create it? Bah. Helps if I read your message more closely. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
Am 14.08.2012 17:06, schrieb David Howells: > Richard Weinberger wrote: > >> I think arch/x86/um/Kconfig makes more sense. > > warthog>ls arch/um > defconfig Kconfig.common Kconfig.um Makefile-os-Linux scripts/ > drivers/ Kconfig.debug kernel/Makefile-ppc sys-ia64/ > include/ Kconfig.net Makefile Makefile-skas sys-ppc/ > Kconfig.char Kconfig.restMakefile-ia64 os-Linux/ > > It doesn't exist. Should I create it? arch/x86/um, not arch/um. arch/um/ contains the generic UML stuff. arch/x86/um/ the x86 specific UML stuff. Thanks, //richard signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
Richard Weinberger wrote: > I think arch/x86/um/Kconfig makes more sense. warthog>ls arch/um defconfig Kconfig.common Kconfig.um Makefile-os-Linux scripts/ drivers/ Kconfig.debug kernel/Makefile-ppc sys-ia64/ include/ Kconfig.net Makefile Makefile-skas sys-ppc/ Kconfig.char Kconfig.restMakefile-ia64 os-Linux/ It doesn't exist. Should I create it? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
Am 14.08.2012 16:54, schrieb David Howells: > David Howells wrote: > >> I can certainly try pasting the lines from x86/Kconfig to uml/Kconfig.common >> to switch the REL/RELA bits, but it would be nice to get this from the actual >> arch if possible to reduce redundancy. > > The attached patch works. > > David > --- > diff --git a/arch/um/Kconfig.common b/arch/um/Kconfig.common > index cb837c2..0463e48 100644 > --- a/arch/um/Kconfig.common > +++ b/arch/um/Kconfig.common > @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ config UML > select GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES > select GENERIC_IO > select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS > + select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL if X86_32 > + select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA if X86_64 I think arch/x86/um/Kconfig makes more sense. Thanks, //richard signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
Am 14.08.2012 16:51, schrieb David Howells: > Richard Weinberger wrote: > >> Is there no way to get this information from the UML subarch? >> Which is currently X86_32 or X86_64. > > Or ppc or ia64? Or are those defunct? Those are defunct. AFAIK viro is working on UML/ppc64. > I can certainly try pasting the lines from x86/Kconfig to uml/Kconfig.common > to switch the REL/RELA bits, but it would be nice to get this from the actual > arch if possible to reduce redundancy. The issue happens only on -next, right? I can have a closer look at the issue tomorrow. Thanks, //richard signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
David Howells wrote: > I can certainly try pasting the lines from x86/Kconfig to uml/Kconfig.common > to switch the REL/RELA bits, but it would be nice to get this from the actual > arch if possible to reduce redundancy. The attached patch works. David --- diff --git a/arch/um/Kconfig.common b/arch/um/Kconfig.common index cb837c2..0463e48 100644 --- a/arch/um/Kconfig.common +++ b/arch/um/Kconfig.common @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ config UML select GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES select GENERIC_IO select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS + select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL if X86_32 + select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA if X86_64 config MMU bool -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
Richard Weinberger wrote: > Is there no way to get this information from the UML subarch? > Which is currently X86_32 or X86_64. Or ppc or ia64? Or are those defunct? I can certainly try pasting the lines from x86/Kconfig to uml/Kconfig.common to switch the REL/RELA bits, but it would be nice to get this from the actual arch if possible to reduce redundancy. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
Am 14.08.2012 16:26, schrieb David Howells: > Rusty Russell wrote: > CC arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.c:96:5: error: redefinition of 'apply_relocate_add' include/linux/moduleloader.h:64:19: note: previous definition of 'apply_relocate_add' was here make[2]: *** [arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o] Error 1 > > Hmmm... I'm not sure how to deal with this. The problem is that UML doesn't > draw the: > > select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL if X86_32 > select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA if X86_64 > > definitions from arch/foo/Kconfig that tell it what modules will look like. > > Should I just enable both REL and RELA in UML, or is there a better way to do > this? Is there no way to get this information from the UML subarch? Which is currently X86_32 or X86_64. Thanks, //richard signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
Rusty Russell wrote: > > > CC arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o > > > arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.c:96:5: error: redefinition of > > > 'apply_relocate_add' > > > include/linux/moduleloader.h:64:19: note: previous definition of > > > 'apply_relocate_add' was here > > > make[2]: *** [arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o] Error 1 Hmmm... I'm not sure how to deal with this. The problem is that UML doesn't draw the: select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL if X86_32 select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA if X86_64 definitions from arch/foo/Kconfig that tell it what modules will look like. Should I just enable both REL and RELA in UML, or is there a better way to do this? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote: CC arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.c:96:5: error: redefinition of 'apply_relocate_add' include/linux/moduleloader.h:64:19: note: previous definition of 'apply_relocate_add' was here make[2]: *** [arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o] Error 1 Hmmm... I'm not sure how to deal with this. The problem is that UML doesn't draw the: select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL if X86_32 select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA if X86_64 definitions from arch/foo/Kconfig that tell it what modules will look like. Should I just enable both REL and RELA in UML, or is there a better way to do this? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
Am 14.08.2012 16:26, schrieb David Howells: Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote: CC arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.c:96:5: error: redefinition of 'apply_relocate_add' include/linux/moduleloader.h:64:19: note: previous definition of 'apply_relocate_add' was here make[2]: *** [arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o] Error 1 Hmmm... I'm not sure how to deal with this. The problem is that UML doesn't draw the: select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL if X86_32 select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA if X86_64 definitions from arch/foo/Kconfig that tell it what modules will look like. Should I just enable both REL and RELA in UML, or is there a better way to do this? Is there no way to get this information from the UML subarch? Which is currently X86_32 or X86_64. Thanks, //richard signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at wrote: Is there no way to get this information from the UML subarch? Which is currently X86_32 or X86_64. Or ppc or ia64? Or are those defunct? I can certainly try pasting the lines from x86/Kconfig to uml/Kconfig.common to switch the REL/RELA bits, but it would be nice to get this from the actual arch if possible to reduce redundancy. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote: I can certainly try pasting the lines from x86/Kconfig to uml/Kconfig.common to switch the REL/RELA bits, but it would be nice to get this from the actual arch if possible to reduce redundancy. The attached patch works. David --- diff --git a/arch/um/Kconfig.common b/arch/um/Kconfig.common index cb837c2..0463e48 100644 --- a/arch/um/Kconfig.common +++ b/arch/um/Kconfig.common @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ config UML select GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES select GENERIC_IO select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS + select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL if X86_32 + select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA if X86_64 config MMU bool -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
Am 14.08.2012 16:51, schrieb David Howells: Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at wrote: Is there no way to get this information from the UML subarch? Which is currently X86_32 or X86_64. Or ppc or ia64? Or are those defunct? Those are defunct. AFAIK viro is working on UML/ppc64. I can certainly try pasting the lines from x86/Kconfig to uml/Kconfig.common to switch the REL/RELA bits, but it would be nice to get this from the actual arch if possible to reduce redundancy. The issue happens only on -next, right? I can have a closer look at the issue tomorrow. Thanks, //richard signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
Am 14.08.2012 16:54, schrieb David Howells: David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote: I can certainly try pasting the lines from x86/Kconfig to uml/Kconfig.common to switch the REL/RELA bits, but it would be nice to get this from the actual arch if possible to reduce redundancy. The attached patch works. David --- diff --git a/arch/um/Kconfig.common b/arch/um/Kconfig.common index cb837c2..0463e48 100644 --- a/arch/um/Kconfig.common +++ b/arch/um/Kconfig.common @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ config UML select GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES select GENERIC_IO select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS + select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL if X86_32 + select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA if X86_64 I think arch/x86/um/Kconfig makes more sense. Thanks, //richard signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at wrote: I think arch/x86/um/Kconfig makes more sense. warthogls arch/um defconfig Kconfig.common Kconfig.um Makefile-os-Linux scripts/ drivers/ Kconfig.debug kernel/Makefile-ppc sys-ia64/ include/ Kconfig.net Makefile Makefile-skas sys-ppc/ Kconfig.char Kconfig.restMakefile-ia64 os-Linux/ It doesn't exist. Should I create it? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
Am 14.08.2012 17:06, schrieb David Howells: Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at wrote: I think arch/x86/um/Kconfig makes more sense. warthogls arch/um defconfig Kconfig.common Kconfig.um Makefile-os-Linux scripts/ drivers/ Kconfig.debug kernel/Makefile-ppc sys-ia64/ include/ Kconfig.net Makefile Makefile-skas sys-ppc/ Kconfig.char Kconfig.restMakefile-ia64 os-Linux/ It doesn't exist. Should I create it? arch/x86/um, not arch/um. arch/um/ contains the generic UML stuff. arch/x86/um/ the x86 specific UML stuff. Thanks, //richard signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote: I think arch/x86/um/Kconfig makes more sense. ... It doesn't exist. Should I create it? Bah. Helps if I read your message more closely. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
How about this then? David --- diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig index 9926e11..a4b0c10 100644 --- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ config 64BIT config X86_32 def_bool !64BIT select HAVE_AOUT + select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL config X86_64 def_bool 64BIT + select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA config RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM def_bool X86_XADD 64BIT -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
Am 14.08.2012 17:15, schrieb David Howells: How about this then? David --- diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig index 9926e11..a4b0c10 100644 --- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ config 64BIT config X86_32 def_bool !64BIT select HAVE_AOUT + select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL config X86_64 def_bool 64BIT + select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA config RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM def_bool X86_XADD 64BIT Looks sane. Acked-by: Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at Thanks, //richard signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
On 08/14/2012 08:17 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am 14.08.2012 17:15, schrieb David Howells: How about this then? David --- diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig index 9926e11..a4b0c10 100644 --- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ config 64BIT config X86_32 def_bool !64BIT select HAVE_AOUT +select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL config X86_64 def_bool 64BIT +select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA config RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM def_bool X86_XADD 64BIT Looks sane. Acked-by: Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at Acked-by: Randy Dunlap rdun...@xenotime.net Thanks. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:00:16 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 07/26/2012 08:18 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 07/25/2012 10:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Please do not add anything to linux-next included branches/series that is > >> destined for v3.7 until after v3.6-rc1 is released. > >> > >> Reminder: do not rebase your branches before asking Linus to pull them ... > >> > >> Changes since 20120725: > >> > > > > > > > > uml on x86_64 (defconfig) build fails with: > > > > CC arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o > > arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.c:96:5: error: redefinition of > > 'apply_relocate_add' > > include/linux/moduleloader.h:64:19: note: previous definition of > > 'apply_relocate_add' was here > > make[2]: *** [arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o] Error 1 > > > > > > > > > > Adding Rusty. > > > This build error is still happening for uml on x86_64 > in linux-next 20120813. No huge surprise, I'll punt this to David Howells :) Cheers, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
On 07/26/2012 08:18 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 07/25/2012 10:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Please do not add anything to linux-next included branches/series that is >> destined for v3.7 until after v3.6-rc1 is released. >> >> Reminder: do not rebase your branches before asking Linus to pull them ... >> >> Changes since 20120725: >> > > > > uml on x86_64 (defconfig) build fails with: > > CC arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o > arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.c:96:5: error: redefinition of > 'apply_relocate_add' > include/linux/moduleloader.h:64:19: note: previous definition of > 'apply_relocate_add' was here > make[2]: *** [arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o] Error 1 > > > Adding Rusty. This build error is still happening for uml on x86_64 in linux-next 20120813. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
On 07/26/2012 08:18 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 07/25/2012 10:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Please do not add anything to linux-next included branches/series that is destined for v3.7 until after v3.6-rc1 is released. Reminder: do not rebase your branches before asking Linus to pull them ... Changes since 20120725: uml on x86_64 (defconfig) build fails with: CC arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.c:96:5: error: redefinition of 'apply_relocate_add' include/linux/moduleloader.h:64:19: note: previous definition of 'apply_relocate_add' was here make[2]: *** [arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o] Error 1 Adding Rusty. This build error is still happening for uml on x86_64 in linux-next 20120813. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:00:16 -0700, Randy Dunlap rdun...@xenotime.net wrote: On 07/26/2012 08:18 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 07/25/2012 10:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Please do not add anything to linux-next included branches/series that is destined for v3.7 until after v3.6-rc1 is released. Reminder: do not rebase your branches before asking Linus to pull them ... Changes since 20120725: uml on x86_64 (defconfig) build fails with: CC arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.c:96:5: error: redefinition of 'apply_relocate_add' include/linux/moduleloader.h:64:19: note: previous definition of 'apply_relocate_add' was here make[2]: *** [arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o] Error 1 Adding Rusty. This build error is still happening for uml on x86_64 in linux-next 20120813. No huge surprise, I'll punt this to David Howells :) Cheers, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
On 07/25/2012 10:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Please do not add anything to linux-next included branches/series that is > destined for v3.7 until after v3.6-rc1 is released. > > Reminder: do not rebase your branches before asking Linus to pull them ... > > Changes since 20120725: > uml on x86_64 (defconfig) build fails with: CC arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.c:96:5: error: redefinition of 'apply_relocate_add' include/linux/moduleloader.h:64:19: note: previous definition of 'apply_relocate_add' was here make[2]: *** [arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o] Error 1 -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
On 07/25/2012 10:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Please do not add anything to linux-next included branches/series that is destined for v3.7 until after v3.6-rc1 is released. Reminder: do not rebase your branches before asking Linus to pull them ... Changes since 20120725: uml on x86_64 (defconfig) build fails with: CC arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.c:96:5: error: redefinition of 'apply_relocate_add' include/linux/moduleloader.h:64:19: note: previous definition of 'apply_relocate_add' was here make[2]: *** [arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o] Error 1 -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
