Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 10 (lib/test_printf.c)

2021-03-14 Thread Yafang Shao
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 5:52 PM Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Tue 2021-03-09 21:57:48, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 3/9/21 8:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > on i386 (at least): > > > > ../lib/test_printf.c: In function 'page_flags_test': > > ../lib/test_printf.c:595:17:

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 10 (lib/test_printf.c)

2021-03-10 Thread Petr Mladek
On Tue 2021-03-09 21:57:48, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 3/9/21 8:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > on i386 (at least): > > ../lib/test_printf.c: In function 'page_flags_test': > ../lib/test_printf.c:595:17: error: 'sec' undeclared (first use in this > function); did you mean

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 10 (lib/test_printf.c)

2021-03-09 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 3/9/21 8:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > on i386 (at least): ../lib/test_printf.c: In function 'page_flags_test': ../lib/test_printf.c:595:17: error: 'sec' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'sem'? page_flags |= (sec & SECTIONS_MASK) << SECTIONS_PGSHIFT;

linux-next: Tree for Mar 10

2021-03-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Warning: Some of the branches in linux-next are still based on v5.12-rc1, so please be careful if you are trying to bisect a bug. News: if your -next included tree is based on Linus' tree tag v5.12-rc1{,-dontuse} (or somewhere between v5.11 and that tag), please consider rebasing it onto

linux-next: Tree for Mar 10

2017-03-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, News: I will not be doing any linux-next releases next week. Changes since 20170309: Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2371 3241 files changed, 291769 insertions(+), 34798 deletions(-) I have

linux-next: Tree for Mar 10

2017-03-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, News: I will not be doing any linux-next releases next week. Changes since 20170309: Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2371 3241 files changed, 291769 insertions(+), 34798 deletions(-) I have

linux-next: Tree for Mar 10

2016-03-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160309: Trees removed: apm, tiny, mips-fixes, lblnet, rpmsg, llvmlinux, bcm2835, kgdb, mmc, random, squashfs all were unsed for at leat a year The xfs tree gained conflicts against the ext4 tree. The aio tree still had a build failure so I used

linux-next: Tree for Mar 10

2016-03-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160309: Trees removed: apm, tiny, mips-fixes, lblnet, rpmsg, llvmlinux, bcm2835, kgdb, mmc, random, squashfs all were unsed for at leat a year The xfs tree gained conflicts against the ext4 tree. The aio tree still had a build failure so I used

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 10 (netdev/switchdev)

2015-03-11 Thread Jiri Pirko
Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:26:35AM CET, rdun...@infradead.org wrote: >On 03/09/15 22:59, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20150306: >> > > >on x86_64: > >net/built-in.o: In function `netdev_switch_fib_ipv4_abort': >(.text+0xf7811): undefined reference to `fib_flush_external' >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 10 (netdev/switchdev)

2015-03-11 Thread Jiri Pirko
Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:26:35AM CET, rdun...@infradead.org wrote: On 03/09/15 22:59, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20150306: on x86_64: net/built-in.o: In function `netdev_switch_fib_ipv4_abort': (.text+0xf7811): undefined reference to `fib_flush_external' I'm taking

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 10 (netdev/switchdev)

2015-03-10 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 03/09/15 22:59, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150306: > on x86_64: net/built-in.o: In function `netdev_switch_fib_ipv4_abort': (.text+0xf7811): undefined reference to `fib_flush_external' Full randconfig file is attached. -- ~Randy # # Automatically generated

linux-next: Tree for Mar 10

2015-03-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150306: The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The sound-asoc tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20150306. The regulator tree gained a build failure for which I applied a fix patch. The staging tree gained a build failure so

linux-next: Tree for Mar 10

2015-03-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150306: The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The sound-asoc tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20150306. The regulator tree gained a build failure for which I applied a fix patch. The staging tree gained a build failure so

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 10 (netdev/switchdev)

2015-03-10 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 03/09/15 22:59, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20150306: on x86_64: net/built-in.o: In function `netdev_switch_fib_ipv4_abort': (.text+0xf7811): undefined reference to `fib_flush_external' Full randconfig file is attached. -- ~Randy # # Automatically generated file;