RE: linux-next: Tree for Mar 18 (cifsd: Kconfig)

2021-03-18 Thread Namjae Jeon
> On 3/18/21 3:08 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > News: there will be no linux-next release on Friday this week. > > > > Warning: Some of the branches in linux-next are still based on > > v5.12-rc1, so please be careful if you are trying to bisect a bug. > > > > News: if your -next

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 18 (cifsd: Kconfig)

2021-03-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 3/18/21 3:08 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > News: there will be no linux-next release on Friday this week. > > Warning: Some of the branches in linux-next are still based on v5.12-rc1, > so please be careful if you are trying to bisect a bug. > > News: if your -next included tree i

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 18

2021-03-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 21:08:44 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > News: there will be no linux-next release on Friday this week. That is no longer true, there will be a release tomorrow. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell pgp4g1zDYUkZf.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

linux-next: Tree for Mar 18

2021-03-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, News: there will be no linux-next release on Friday this week. Warning: Some of the branches in linux-next are still based on v5.12-rc1, so please be careful if you are trying to bisect a bug. News: if your -next included tree is based on Linus' tree tag v5.12-rc1{,-dontuse} (or somewher

linux-next: Tree for Mar 18

2019-03-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190306: The cisco tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 591 502 files changed, 14759 insertions(+), 4153 deletions(-) I have created today's

linux-next: Tree for Mar 18

2016-03-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any v4.7 related material to your linux-next included trees until after v4.6-rc1 is released. Changes since 20160317: Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 8355 6521 files changed, 312330 insertions(+), 167844 deletions(-) --

linux-next: Tree for Mar 18

2015-03-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150317: The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch and gained a conflict against the ext3 tree. The slave-dma tree gained conflicts against the arm-soc and renesas trees. The crypto tree lost its build failure. The virtio tree gained a conflict

linux-next: Tree for Mar 18

2014-03-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree still fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140317: The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The mvebu tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The net-next tree still had its another build failures and gained another for which I

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 18 (mtdcore)

2013-03-19 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 14:38 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled: Thanks Randy, should be fixed now. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 18 (mtdcore)

2013-03-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 03/17/13 22:18, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130315: > when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled: CC [M] drivers/mtd/mtdcore.o drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c: In function 'init_mtd': drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c:1183:2: error: 'proc_mtd' undeclared (first use in this function) drivers

linux-next: Tree for Mar 18

2013-03-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20130315: New trees: mfd-fixes, vfio-fixes The ftrace tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The char-misc tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20130315. The gpio tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. The arm-soc tree