Hi all,
Changes since 20201008:
The tip tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit series.
The rcu tree gained a conflict agsinst the tip tree.
The kspp tree gained a conflict agsinst Linus' tree.
The xarray tree lost its build failures.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus'
Hi all,
Changes since 20191008:
The bpf-next tree gained a conflict against the bpf tree.
The drm-misc tree gained conflicts against the drm tree and a semantic
conflict against the amdgpu tree.
The staging tree lost its build failure.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3142
3370
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 07:02:34PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20181008:
>
> The s390 tree gained a conflict against the compiler-attributes tree.
>
> The ext4 tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
>
> The nfsd tree lost its build failure.
>
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 07:02:34PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20181008:
>
> The s390 tree gained a conflict against the compiler-attributes tree.
>
> The ext4 tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
>
> The nfsd tree lost its build failure.
>
On 10/9/18 1:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20181008:
>
on i386:
fs/proc/vmcore.o: In function `read_from_oldmem.part.4':
vmcore.c:(.text+0x14f): undefined reference to `copy_oldmem_page_encrypted'
Full randconfig file is attached.
--
~Randy
#
# Automatically
On 10/9/18 1:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20181008:
>
on i386:
fs/proc/vmcore.o: In function `read_from_oldmem.part.4':
vmcore.c:(.text+0x14f): undefined reference to `copy_oldmem_page_encrypted'
Full randconfig file is attached.
--
~Randy
#
# Automatically
On 10/9/18 1:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20181008:
>
on i386:
net/mpls/af_mpls.o: In function `mpls_dump_routes':
af_mpls.c:(.text+0x15e5): undefined reference to `ip_valid_fib_dump_req'
Full randconfig file is attached.
--
~Randy
#
# Automatically generated
On 10/9/18 1:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20181008:
>
on i386:
net/mpls/af_mpls.o: In function `mpls_dump_routes':
af_mpls.c:(.text+0x15e5): undefined reference to `ip_valid_fib_dump_req'
Full randconfig file is attached.
--
~Randy
#
# Automatically generated
Hi all,
Changes since 20181008:
The s390 tree gained a conflict against the compiler-attributes tree.
The ext4 tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The nfsd tree lost its build failure.
The crypto tree lost its build failure.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against
Hi all,
Changes since 20181008:
The s390 tree gained a conflict against the compiler-attributes tree.
The ext4 tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The nfsd tree lost its build failure.
The crypto tree lost its build failure.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against
Hi Randy,
>> Changes since 20151008:
>>
>
> on i386:
>
> warning: (BT_HCIBPA10X) selects BT_HCIUART_H4 which has unmet direct
> dependencies (NET && BT && BT_HCIUART)
>
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `bpa10x_rx_complete':
> bpa10x.c:(.text+0x2ac5e2): undefined reference to `h4_recv_buf'
On 10/08/15 23:24, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20151008:
>
on i386:
warning: (BT_HCIBPA10X) selects BT_HCIUART_H4 which has unmet direct
dependencies (NET && BT && BT_HCIUART)
drivers/built-in.o: In function `bpa10x_rx_complete':
bpa10x.c:(.text+0x2ac5e2): undefined
Hi all,
Changes since 20151008:
My fixes tree contains:
"perf tools: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks"
"word-at-a-time.h: powerpc: implement define zero_bytemask"
I used the h8300 tree from next-20150828 since the current tree has been
rebased onto linux-next
Hi all,
Changes since 20151008:
My fixes tree contains:
"perf tools: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks"
"word-at-a-time.h: powerpc: implement define zero_bytemask"
I used the h8300 tree from next-20150828 since the current tree has been
rebased onto linux-next
Hi Randy,
>> Changes since 20151008:
>>
>
> on i386:
>
> warning: (BT_HCIBPA10X) selects BT_HCIUART_H4 which has unmet direct
> dependencies (NET && BT && BT_HCIUART)
>
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `bpa10x_rx_complete':
> bpa10x.c:(.text+0x2ac5e2): undefined reference to `h4_recv_buf'
On 10/08/15 23:24, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20151008:
>
on i386:
warning: (BT_HCIBPA10X) selects BT_HCIUART_H4 which has unmet direct
dependencies (NET && BT && BT_HCIUART)
drivers/built-in.o: In function `bpa10x_rx_complete':
bpa10x.c:(.text+0x2ac5e2): undefined
Hi all,
Please do not add any material intended for v3.19 to your linux-next
included trees until after v3.18-rc1 has been released.
Changes since 20141008:
Removed tree: dmaengine
The tip tree gained a conflict against the mips tree.
The percpu gained a conflict against the tip tree.
Hi all,
Please do not add any material intended for v3.19 to your linux-next
included trees until after v3.18-rc1 has been released.
Changes since 20141008:
Removed tree: dmaengine
The tip tree gained a conflict against the mips tree.
The percpu gained a conflict against the tip tree.
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 08:44:24AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 08:29:06AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 04:14:22PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
> > >
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 08:29:06AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 04:14:22PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
> > repository below:
> >
> >
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 04:14:22PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
> repository below:
>
> git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
>
> A next-20131009 tag is also provided for convenience.
>
> Gained
Hi all,
I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
repository below:
git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
A next-20131009 tag is also provided for convenience.
Gained a few conflicts, but nothing too exciting. x86, ARM, PowerPC and
MIPS default
Hi all,
I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
repository below:
git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
A next-20131009 tag is also provided for convenience.
Gained a few conflicts, but nothing too exciting. x86, ARM, PowerPC and
MIPS default
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 04:14:22PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
Hi all,
I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
repository below:
git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
A next-20131009 tag is also provided for convenience.
Gained a few
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 08:29:06AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 04:14:22PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
Hi all,
I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
repository below:
git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
A
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 08:44:24AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 08:29:06AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 04:14:22PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
Hi all,
I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
repository below:
Hi all,
Do not add stuff destined for v3.8 to your linux-next included branches
until after v3.7-rc1 is released.
Changes since 201201008:
Conflicts are migrating as trees are merged by Linus.
I have created today's
Hi all,
Do not add stuff destined for v3.8 to your linux-next included branches
until after v3.7-rc1 is released.
Changes since 201201008:
Conflicts are migrating as trees are merged by Linus.
I have created today's
28 matches
Mail list logo
