Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi Yoshinori, On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:28:32 +0900 Yoshinori Sato wrote: > > OK. > Fixed. Thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to

Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi Yoshinori, On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:28:32 +0900 Yoshinori Sato wrote: > > OK. > Fixed. Thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message

Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 06:57:43 +0900, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:21:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 14:28:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > It is now based on next-20150925. As I have said before, you cannot > > >

Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi, On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:21:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 14:28:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > It is now based on next-20150925. As I have said before, you cannot > > base your linux-next included branch on a linux-next release. You > > should either

Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi, On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:21:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 14:28:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > It is now based on next-20150925. As I have said before, you cannot > > base your linux-next included branch on

Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 06:57:43 +0900, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:21:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 14:28:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > It is now based on

Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi, On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 14:28:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > It is now based on next-20150925. As I have said before, you cannot > base your linux-next included branch on a linux-next release. You > should either base it on Linus' tree, or one of the other linux-next > included branches

Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi, On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 14:28:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > It is now based on next-20150925. As I have said before, you cannot > base your linux-next included branch on a linux-next release. You > should either base it on Linus' tree, or one of the other

Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi Yoshinori, On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 15:11:48 +0900 Yoshinori Sato wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 08:12:01 +0900, > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:10:30 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > Please do "gitk 9751a9e449da..h8300-next" in your tree and look at > > >

Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 08:12:01 +0900, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Yoshinori, > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:10:30 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > Please do "gitk 9751a9e449da..h8300-next" in your tree and look at > > it (9751a9e449da is in Linus' tree). As I suggested above, maybe you >

Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 08:12:01 +0900, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Yoshinori, > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:10:30 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > Please do "gitk 9751a9e449da..h8300-next" in your tree and look at > > it (9751a9e449da is in Linus' tree). As I

Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi Yoshinori, On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 15:11:48 +0900 Yoshinori Sato wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 08:12:01 +0900, > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:10:30 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > Please do "gitk

Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi Yoshinori, On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:10:30 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Please do "gitk 9751a9e449da..h8300-next" in your tree and look at > it (9751a9e449da is in Linus' tree). As I suggested above, maybe you > should go back to commit 99bcfda85f66 and work forward from there > (after

Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi Yoshinori, On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 09:54:25 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 07:40:33 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:43:04 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > The h8300 tree today has been based on linux-next. This cannto work. >

Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi Yoshinori, On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:10:30 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Please do "gitk 9751a9e449da..h8300-next" in your tree and look at > it (9751a9e449da is in Linus' tree). As I suggested above, maybe you > should go back to commit 99bcfda85f66 and work forward

Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi Yoshinori, On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 09:54:25 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 07:40:33 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:43:04 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > >

Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi Yoshinori, On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 07:40:33 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:43:04 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > The h8300 tree today has been based on linux-next. This cannto work. > > Please rebase this onto Linus' tree (or some other stable base). > > > >

Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi Yoshinori, On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 07:40:33 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:43:04 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > The h8300 tree today has been based on linux-next. This cannto work. > > Please rebase this onto

Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi Yoshinori, On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:43:04 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > The h8300 tree today has been based on linux-next. This cannto work. > Please rebase this onto Linus' tree (or some other stable base). > > I cannot use your tree in this state, so it will be dropped from >

Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi Yoshinori, On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:43:04 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > The h8300 tree today has been based on linux-next. This cannto work. > Please rebase this onto Linus' tree (or some other stable base). > > I cannot use your tree in this state, so it will be

linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi Yoshinori, The h8300 tree today has been based on linux-next. This cannto work. Please rebase this onto Linus' tree (or some other stable base). I cannot use your tree in this state, so it will be dropped from linux-next until it is fixed. Also, Linus cannot pull it in this state. --

linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi Yoshinori, The h8300 tree today has been based on linux-next. This cannto work. Please rebase this onto Linus' tree (or some other stable base). I cannot use your tree in this state, so it will be dropped from linux-next until it is fixed. Also, Linus cannot pull it in this state. --