On 8/9/2016 4:54 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
>> On 8/7/2016 9:58 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> With Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed
>>> like this:
>>>
>>>
On 8/9/2016 4:54 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
>> On 8/7/2016 9:58 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> With Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed
>>> like this:
>>>
>>>
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On 8/7/2016 9:58 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> With Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed
>> like this:
>>
>> drivers/infiniband/sw/built-in.o:(.opd+0x1698): multiple definition
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On 8/7/2016 9:58 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> With Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed
>> like this:
>>
>> drivers/infiniband/sw/built-in.o:(.opd+0x1698): multiple definition of
>> `copy_data'
Hi Doug,
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 19:30:57 -0400 Doug Ledford wrote:
>
> Doh! My apologies, that would certainly explain it. I'll reset my
> for-next tag.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Hi Doug,
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 19:30:57 -0400 Doug Ledford wrote:
>
> Doh! My apologies, that would certainly explain it. I'll reset my
> for-next tag.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On 8/8/2016 5:53 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 11:37:33 -0400 Doug Ledford wrote:
>>
>> On 8/7/2016 9:58 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> With Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed
>>> like this:
>>>
>>>
On 8/8/2016 5:53 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 11:37:33 -0400 Doug Ledford wrote:
>>
>> On 8/7/2016 9:58 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> With Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed
>>> like this:
>>>
>>>
Hi Doug,
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 11:37:33 -0400 Doug Ledford wrote:
>
> On 8/7/2016 9:58 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > With Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed
> > like this:
> >
> > drivers/infiniband/sw/built-in.o:(.opd+0x1698): multiple
Hi Doug,
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 11:37:33 -0400 Doug Ledford wrote:
>
> On 8/7/2016 9:58 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > With Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed
> > like this:
> >
> > drivers/infiniband/sw/built-in.o:(.opd+0x1698): multiple definition of
> >
On 8/7/2016 9:58 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed
> like this:
>
> drivers/infiniband/sw/built-in.o:(.opd+0x1698): multiple definition of
> `copy_data'
> drivers/infiniband/hw/built-in.o:(.opd+0xe5f8): first
On 8/7/2016 9:58 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed
> like this:
>
> drivers/infiniband/sw/built-in.o:(.opd+0x1698): multiple definition of
> `copy_data'
> drivers/infiniband/hw/built-in.o:(.opd+0xe5f8): first
Hi all,
With Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed
like this:
drivers/infiniband/sw/built-in.o:(.opd+0x1698): multiple definition of
`copy_data'
drivers/infiniband/hw/built-in.o:(.opd+0xe5f8): first defined here
drivers/infiniband/sw/built-in.o:(.opd+0x1320):
Hi all,
With Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed
like this:
drivers/infiniband/sw/built-in.o:(.opd+0x1698): multiple definition of
`copy_data'
drivers/infiniband/hw/built-in.o:(.opd+0xe5f8): first defined here
drivers/infiniband/sw/built-in.o:(.opd+0x1320):
Hi Linus,
After merging Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
lib/string.c: In function 'strscpy':
lib/string.c:209:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'zero_bytemask'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
*(unsigned long *)(dest+res) = c
Hi Linus,
After merging Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
lib/string.c: In function 'strscpy':
lib/string.c:209:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'zero_bytemask'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
*(unsigned long *)(dest+res) = c
16 matches
Mail list logo