> On Jun 26, 2016, at 20:58, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi Trond,
>
> After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> fs/nfs/pnfs_nfs.c: In function 'pnfs_nfs_generic_sync':
> fs/nfs/pnfs_nfs.c:947:8: error: too few
> On Jun 26, 2016, at 20:58, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi Trond,
>
> After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> fs/nfs/pnfs_nfs.c: In function 'pnfs_nfs_generic_sync':
> fs/nfs/pnfs_nfs.c:947:8: error: too few arguments to function
>
Hi Trond,
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
fs/nfs/pnfs_nfs.c: In function 'pnfs_nfs_generic_sync':
fs/nfs/pnfs_nfs.c:947:8: error: too few arguments to function 'nfs_commit_inode'
ret = nfs_commit_inode(inode);
^
In file
Hi Trond,
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
fs/nfs/pnfs_nfs.c: In function 'pnfs_nfs_generic_sync':
fs/nfs/pnfs_nfs.c:947:8: error: too few arguments to function 'nfs_commit_inode'
ret = nfs_commit_inode(inode);
^
In file
Hi Trond,
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
fs/nfs/direct.c: In function 'nfs_direct_write_reschedule':
fs/nfs/direct.c:652:32: error: 'struct pnfs_ds_commit_info' has no member named
'nbuckets'
for (i = 0; i <
Hi Trond,
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
fs/nfs/direct.c: In function 'nfs_direct_write_reschedule':
fs/nfs/direct.c:652:32: error: 'struct pnfs_ds_commit_info' has no member named
'nbuckets'
for (i = 0; i <
On 05/19/2016 08:06 AM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Thanks Stephen!
>
> Anna will be managing pushing the NFS client changes to Linus during
> this merge window, so I'm assuming she will include this and your
> other fixup in her pull request.
Yep! I'll make sure it's in there.
Anna
>
> Cheers
On 05/19/2016 08:06 AM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Thanks Stephen!
>
> Anna will be managing pushing the NFS client changes to Linus during
> this merge window, so I'm assuming she will include this and your
> other fixup in her pull request.
Yep! I'll make sure it's in there.
Anna
>
> Cheers
Thanks Stephen!
Anna will be managing pushing the NFS client changes to Linus during
this merge window, so I'm assuming she will include this and your
other fixup in her pull request.
Cheers
Trond
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Trond,
>
>
Thanks Stephen!
Anna will be managing pushing the NFS client changes to Linus during
this merge window, so I'm assuming she will include this and your
other fixup in her pull request.
Cheers
Trond
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Trond,
>
> After merging the nfs
Hi Trond,
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/fs.h:19:0,
from fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c:4:
fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c: In function 'nfs42_proc_copy':
fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c:212:30: error: 'struct inode'
Hi Trond,
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/fs.h:19:0,
from fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c:4:
fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c: In function 'nfs42_proc_copy':
fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c:212:30: error: 'struct inode'
Hello!
On Aug 24, 2015, at 10:17 AM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi Trond,
>>
>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:56:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
Hi Stephen,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Trond,
>
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:56:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
>> failed like this:
>>
>>
Hello!
On Aug 24, 2015, at 10:17 AM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi Trond,
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:56:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
After merging the nfs tree, today's
Hi Stephen,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi Trond,
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:56:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
Hi Trond,
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:56:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c: In function
> 'kiblnd_pmr_pool_map':
>
Hi Trond,
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:56:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c: In function
'kiblnd_pmr_pool_map':
Hello!
On Aug 18, 2015, at 8:05 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Trond,
>
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:56:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
>> failed like this:
>>
>>
Hi Trond,
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:56:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c: In function
> 'kiblnd_pmr_pool_map':
>
Hi Trond,
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:56:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c: In function
'kiblnd_pmr_pool_map':
Hello!
On Aug 18, 2015, at 8:05 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Trond,
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:56:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
Hi Trond,
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c: In function
'kiblnd_pmr_pool_map':
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c:1828:2: error: implicit
declaration of function
Hi Trond,
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c: In function
'kiblnd_pmr_pool_map':
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c:1828:2: error: implicit
declaration of function
Thanks Stephen!
Trond, can you just pick up the patch? Considered it:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:04:53PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Trond,
>
> After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
>
Hi Trond,
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
fs/nfs/blocklayout/extent_tree.c: In function 'ext_tree_prepare_commit':
fs/nfs/blocklayout/extent_tree.c:540:3: error: implicit declaration of function
'__vmalloc'
Hi Trond,
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
fs/nfs/blocklayout/extent_tree.c: In function 'ext_tree_prepare_commit':
fs/nfs/blocklayout/extent_tree.c:540:3: error: implicit declaration of function
'__vmalloc'
Thanks Stephen!
Trond, can you just pick up the patch? Considered it:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:04:53PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Trond,
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
Hi Trond,
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
In file included from fs/nfs/dns_resolve.c:52:0:
fs/nfs/netns.h:28:15: error: 'NFS4_MAX_MINOR_VERSION' undeclared here (not in a
function)
int cb_users[NFS4_MAX_MINOR_VERSION + 1];
Hi Trond,
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
In file included from fs/nfs/dns_resolve.c:52:0:
fs/nfs/netns.h:28:15: error: 'NFS4_MAX_MINOR_VERSION' undeclared here (not in a
function)
int cb_users[NFS4_MAX_MINOR_VERSION + 1];
; Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfs tree
>
> Hi Trond,
>
> After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/nfs/callback.c: In function 'nfs_minorversion_callback_svc_setup':
> fs/nfs/callback
Hi Trond,
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
fs/nfs/callback.c: In function 'nfs_minorversion_callback_svc_setup':
fs/nfs/callback.c:206:21: error: 'ENOTSUP' undeclared (first use in this
function)
Caused by commit 141e1f553b6e
Hi Trond,
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
fs/nfs/callback.c: In function 'nfs_minorversion_callback_svc_setup':
fs/nfs/callback.c:206:21: error: 'ENOTSUP' undeclared (first use in this
function)
Caused by commit 141e1f553b6e
failure after merge of the nfs tree
Hi Trond,
After merging the nfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
fs/nfs/callback.c: In function 'nfs_minorversion_callback_svc_setup':
fs/nfs/callback.c:206:21: error: 'ENOTSUP' undeclared (first use
34 matches
Mail list logo