Hi all,
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:58:36 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the origin tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/linux/random.h:14,
> from arch/arm/kernel/signal.c:8:
>
Hi all,
After merging the origin tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/random.h:14,
from arch/arm/kernel/signal.c:8:
arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h: In function '__my_cpu_offset':
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:24:44AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:17 PM Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > I'll look into this more tomorrow. (But yes, __latent_entropy is
> > absolutely used for globals already, as you found, but this is the first
> > percpu it was applied to...)
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:17 PM Kees Cook wrote:
>
> I'll look into this more tomorrow. (But yes, __latent_entropy is
> absolutely used for globals already, as you found, but this is the first
> percpu it was applied to...)
Note that it was always per-cpu.
The only thing that changed was that
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 08:14:07AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 05:22:50AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 08:17:48PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > And just another heads-up, the patch[1] (which was never sent to a public
> > > list) also breaks
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:09:23AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:59:09AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > From 33d819f4efa0a4474b5dc2e4bcaef1b886ca30c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Marc Zyngier
> > Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:53:05 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] arm64:
On 2020-07-30 07:14, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 05:22:50AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 08:17:48PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> And just another heads-up, the patch[1] (which was never sent to a public
> list) also breaks arm64 (circular header needs?):
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:59:09AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> From 33d819f4efa0a4474b5dc2e4bcaef1b886ca30c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Marc Zyngier
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:53:05 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Drop unnecessary include from asm/smp.h
>
> asm/pointer_auth.h is not
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 05:22:50AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 08:17:48PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > And just another heads-up, the patch[1] (which was never sent to a public
> > list) also breaks arm64 (circular header needs?):
> (...)
>
> Definitely, we've just got a
Hi Kees,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 08:17:48PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> And just another heads-up, the patch[1] (which was never sent to a public
> list) also breaks arm64 (circular header needs?):
(...)
Definitely, we've just got a report about this, I'll have a look once
I'm at the office. I'd
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 04:43:04PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:08 PM Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > include/linux/random.h:123:24: error: variable 'net_rand_state' with
> > 'latent_entropy' attribute must not be local
> > 123 | DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct rnd_state,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 07:12:58PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 5:09 PM Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> > Removing the __latent_entropy marker obviously fixes things.
>
> Ok, I did that for now. I spent a few minutes looking at the gcc
> plugin in case I'd be hit by some
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 5:09 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Removing the __latent_entropy marker obviously fixes things.
Ok, I did that for now. I spent a few minutes looking at the gcc
plugin in case I'd be hit by some sudden stroke of genius, but that
didn't happen, so let's avoid the issue
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:43 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Ok, this shows a limitation of my allmodconfig testing (and all my
> normal builds) - no plugins. So that problem wasn't as obvious as it
> should have been.
Ok, that was easy to install and get the coverage, and now I see the error.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:08 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> include/linux/random.h:123:24: error: variable 'net_rand_state' with
> 'latent_entropy' attribute must not be local
> 123 | DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct rnd_state, net_rand_state) __latent_entropy;
Hmm.
Ok, this shows a limitation of my
Hi all,
After merging the origin tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/asm-generic/percpu.h:7,
from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:556,
from arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:6,
from
+++ Josh Poimboeuf [04/06/20 19:04 -0500]:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 08:37:15AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the origin tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
kernel/module.c: In function 'do_init_module':
kernel/module.c:3593:2:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 08:37:15AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the origin tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> kernel/module.c: In function 'do_init_module':
> kernel/module.c:3593:2: error: implicit declaration of
Hi all,
After merging the origin tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
kernel/module.c: In function 'do_init_module':
kernel/module.c:3593:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'module_enable_ro'; did you mean 'module_enable_x'?
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:52:21 +0900 Yasuaki Ishimatsu
wrote:
>
> 2012/10/10 8:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:21:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Linus,
> >>
> >> In Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed
> >> like this:
>
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:45:14 -0700 Andrew Morton
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:21:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>
> > I can't see what the point of the "pfn" variable is
>
> This:
>
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c~a
> +++
Hi Stephen,
2012/10/10 8:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:21:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
Hi Linus,
In Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed
like this:
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c: In function
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:21:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> In Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed
> like this:
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c: In function
> 'pseries_remove_memblock':
>
Hi Linus,
In Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed
like this:
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c: In function
'pseries_remove_memblock':
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c:103:17: error: unused variable
'pfn' [-Werror=unused-variable]
Hi Linus,
In Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed
like this:
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c: In function
'pseries_remove_memblock':
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c:103:17: error: unused variable
'pfn' [-Werror=unused-variable]
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:21:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi Linus,
In Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed
like this:
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c: In function
'pseries_remove_memblock':
Hi Stephen,
2012/10/10 8:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:21:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi Linus,
In Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed
like this:
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c: In function
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:45:14 -0700 Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:21:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
I can't see what the point of the pfn variable is
This:
---
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:52:21 +0900 Yasuaki Ishimatsu
isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com wrote:
2012/10/10 8:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:21:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi Linus,
In Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
29 matches
Mail list logo
