Re: linux-next: build failure in dwarf-regs.c

2012-10-02 Thread Ben Guthro
Hi Ian, Once again - apologies for multiple copies of this email. Please reply to this (plain text) version so it will get through LKML filters. On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Ian Munsie wrote: > > > > CC arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.o > > Is this correct? i.e. Are you building perf for x86?

Re: linux-next: build failure in dwarf-regs.c

2012-10-02 Thread Ben Guthro
Hi Ian, Once again - apologies for multiple copies of this email. Please reply to this (plain text) version so it will get through LKML filters. On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Ian Munsie imun...@au1.ibm.com wrote: CC arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.o Is this correct? i.e. Are you building perf

Re: linux-next: build failure in dwarf-regs.c

2012-10-01 Thread Ian Munsie
Hey Ben, Adding some people to CC... Excerpts from Ben Guthro's message of 2012-10-02 11:02:59 +1000: > I pulled the latest bits up to 797b9e5ae93270ec27a1f1ed48cd697d01b2269f - > but am seeing the following build failure with gcc 4.6.3 Building that SHA works for me (on x86, haven't tried PPC

linux-next: build failure in dwarf-regs.c

2012-10-01 Thread Ben Guthro
I pulled the latest bits up to 797b9e5ae93270ec27a1f1ed48cd697d01b2269f - but am seeing the following build failure with gcc 4.6.3 CC arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.o arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.c:72:13: error: no previous prototype for 'get_arch_regstr' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] cc1: all warnings

linux-next: build failure in dwarf-regs.c

2012-10-01 Thread Ben Guthro
I pulled the latest bits up to 797b9e5ae93270ec27a1f1ed48cd697d01b2269f - but am seeing the following build failure with gcc 4.6.3 CC arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.o arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.c:72:13: error: no previous prototype for 'get_arch_regstr' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] cc1: all warnings

Re: linux-next: build failure in dwarf-regs.c

2012-10-01 Thread Ian Munsie
Hey Ben, Adding some people to CC... Excerpts from Ben Guthro's message of 2012-10-02 11:02:59 +1000: I pulled the latest bits up to 797b9e5ae93270ec27a1f1ed48cd697d01b2269f - but am seeing the following build failure with gcc 4.6.3 Building that SHA works for me (on x86, haven't tried PPC