Hi Ian,
Once again - apologies for multiple copies of this email. Please reply
to this (plain text) version so it will get through LKML filters.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Ian Munsie wrote:
>
>
> > CC arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.o
>
> Is this correct? i.e. Are you building perf for x86?
Hi Ian,
Once again - apologies for multiple copies of this email. Please reply
to this (plain text) version so it will get through LKML filters.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Ian Munsie imun...@au1.ibm.com wrote:
CC arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.o
Is this correct? i.e. Are you building perf
Hey Ben,
Adding some people to CC...
Excerpts from Ben Guthro's message of 2012-10-02 11:02:59 +1000:
> I pulled the latest bits up to 797b9e5ae93270ec27a1f1ed48cd697d01b2269f -
> but am seeing the following build failure with gcc 4.6.3
Building that SHA works for me (on x86, haven't tried PPC
I pulled the latest bits up to
797b9e5ae93270ec27a1f1ed48cd697d01b2269f - but am seeing the following
build failure with gcc 4.6.3
CC arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.o
arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.c:72:13: error: no previous prototype for
'get_arch_regstr' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
cc1: all warnings
I pulled the latest bits up to
797b9e5ae93270ec27a1f1ed48cd697d01b2269f - but am seeing the following
build failure with gcc 4.6.3
CC arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.o
arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.c:72:13: error: no previous prototype for
'get_arch_regstr' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
cc1: all warnings
Hey Ben,
Adding some people to CC...
Excerpts from Ben Guthro's message of 2012-10-02 11:02:59 +1000:
I pulled the latest bits up to 797b9e5ae93270ec27a1f1ed48cd697d01b2269f -
but am seeing the following build failure with gcc 4.6.3
Building that SHA works for me (on x86, haven't tried PPC
6 matches
Mail list logo