Randy,
On 2/24/21 13:45, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 2/24/21 1:41 PM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
>> On 2/24/21 02:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
I'll setup doc generation using sphinx on my machine, is there
a particular command line that you have used for these warnings ?
>>> I just do a "make
On 2/24/21 1:41 PM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> On 2/24/21 02:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> I'll setup doc generation using sphinx on my machine, is there
>>> a particular command line that you have used for these warnings ?
>> I just do a "make htmldocs"
> I did that, please have a look at the t
On 2/24/21 02:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> I'll setup doc generation using sphinx on my machine, is there
>> a particular command line that you have used for these warnings ?
> I just do a "make htmldocs"
I did that, please have a look at the test log.
Hi Chaitanya,
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 05:38:06 + Chaitanya Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On 2/23/21 21:33, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> I've failed to understand this warning as rwbs is present in the doc header
> >> and in the function parameter :-
> > I presume it is the missing ':' after @rwbs in the
On 2/23/21 21:33, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> 1f83bb4b4914 ("blktrace: add blk_fill_rwbs documentation comment")
>>>
>>> -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
>> I've failed to understand this warning as rwbs is present in the doc header
>> and in the function parameter :-
> I presume it is the missing '
On 2/23/21 21:33, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> I've failed to understand this warning as rwbs is present in the doc header
>> and in the function parameter :-
> I presume it is the missing ':' after @rwbs in the comment.
Thanks, I was looking at the wrong places all this time, will send a fix.
I'll
Hi Chaitanya,
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 05:25:49 + Chaitanya Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On 2/23/21 18:31, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
> > produced this warning:
> >
> > kernel/trace/blktrace.c:1878: warning: Function parame
Stephen,
On 2/23/21 18:31, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
> produced this warning:
>
> kernel/trace/blktrace.c:1878: warning: Function parameter or member 'rwbs'
> not described in 'blk_fill_rwbs'`
>
> Introduced by commit
>
On 2/23/21 18:31, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
> produced this warning:
>
> kernel/trace/blktrace.c:1878: warning: Function parameter or member 'rwbs'
> not described in 'blk_fill_rwbs'`
>
> Introduced by commit
>
> 1f83b
Hi all,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
kernel/trace/blktrace.c:1878: warning: Function parameter or member 'rwbs' not
described in 'blk_fill_rwbs'`
Introduced by commit
1f83bb4b4914 ("blktrace: add blk_fill_rwbs documentation comment"
On 12/22/20 4:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> fs/io_uring.c: In function 'io_uring_get_file':
> fs/io_uring.c:9408:6: warning: unused variable 'ret' [-Wunused-variable]
> 9408 |
Hi all,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
fs/io_uring.c: In function 'io_uring_get_file':
fs/io_uring.c:9408:6: warning: unused variable 'ret' [-Wunused-variable]
9408 | int ret;
| ^~~
Introduced by commit
efc2519f
Hi all,
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:14:36 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 18:39:58 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
> > produced this warning:
> >
> > fs/block_dev.c:1838: warning: Function parameter or
Hi all,
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:13:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 18:37:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
> > produced this warning:
> >
> > fs/block_dev.c:1067: warning: Excess function parame
Hi all,
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 18:39:58 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
> produced this warning:
>
> fs/block_dev.c:1838: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not
> described in 'lookup_bdev'
>
> Introduced by commit
>
>
Hi all,
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 18:37:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
> produced this warning:
>
> fs/block_dev.c:1067: warning: Excess function parameter 'whole' description
> in 'bd_abort_claiming'
>
> Introduced by commit
>
Hi all,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
kernel/trace/blktrace.c:1039: warning: Excess function parameter 'q'
description in 'blk_add_trace_rq_remap'
Introduced by commit
a54895fa057c ("block: remove the request_queue to argument reques
Hi all,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
fs/block_dev.c:1838: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described
in 'lookup_bdev'
Introduced by commit
4e7b5671c6a8 ("block: remove i_bdev")
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpR6qOH
Hi all,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
fs/block_dev.c:1067: warning: Excess function parameter 'whole' description in
'bd_abort_claiming'
Introduced by commit
37c3fc9abb25 ("block: simplify the block device claiming interface")
--
C
Hi all,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
block/genhd.c:439: warning: Function parameter or member 'probe' not described
in '__register_blkdev'
Introduced by commit
3da1a61e7046 ("block: add an optional probe callback to major_names")
-
On 10/22/20 5:48 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (KCONFIG_NAME)
> produced this warning:
>
> fs/io_uring.c: In function 'loop_rw_iter':
> fs/io_uring.c:3141:21: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different
> size [-Wint-to-po
Hi all,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (KCONFIG_NAME)
produced this warning:
fs/io_uring.c: In function 'loop_rw_iter':
fs/io_uring.c:3141:21: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
[-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
3141 |iovec.iov_base = (void __user *) req->
On 7/1/20 7:21 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/md/dm.c: In function '__map_bio':
> drivers/md/dm.c:1296:24: warning: unused variable 'md' [-Wunused-variable]
> 1296 |
Hi all,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/md/dm.c: In function '__map_bio':
drivers/md/dm.c:1296:24: warning: unused variable 'md' [-Wunused-variable]
1296 | struct mapped_device *md = io->md;
|
Hi Jens,
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 18:56:39 -0600 Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> I'll fix these warnings up, guessing it's 32-bit?
Thanks. Yeah 32 bit.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpAAZTHyaXeP.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 10/17/19 6:56 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/17/19 6:51 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>>
>> fs/io_uring.c: In function 'io_accept':
>> fs/io_uring.c:1729:9: warning: cast to po
On 10/17/19 6:51 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> fs/io_uring.c: In function 'io_accept':
> fs/io_uring.c:1729:9: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
> [-Wint
Hi all,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
fs/io_uring.c: In function 'io_accept':
fs/io_uring.c:1729:9: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
[-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
1729 | addr = (struct sockaddr __user *)
On 8/29/19 9:41 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 02:08:28PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> From: Stephen Rothwell
>> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:03:43 +1000
>> Subject: [PATCH] blkcg: blk-iocost: predeclare used structs
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell
>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 02:08:28PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:03:43 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] blkcg: blk-iocost: predeclare used structs
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell
Acked-by: Tejun Heo
Thanks.
> ---
> include/trace/events/iocos
Hi all,
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 13:51:50 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> In file included from include/trace/events/iocost.h:8,
> from :
> include/trace/events/iocost.h:12:57
Hi all,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
In file included from include/trace/events/iocost.h:8,
from :
include/trace/events/iocost.h:12:57: warning: 'struct ioc_now' declared inside
parameter list will not be vis
On 2019/8/9 12:00, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/lightnvm/pblk-read.c: In function 'pblk_submit_read_gc':
> drivers/lightnvm/pblk-read.c:421:18: warning: unused variable 'geo'
On 8/8/19 9:00 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/lightnvm/pblk-read.c: In function 'pblk_submit_read_gc':
> drivers/lightnvm/pblk-read.c:421:18: warning: unused variable 'geo'
Hi all,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/lightnvm/pblk-read.c: In function 'pblk_submit_read_gc':
drivers/lightnvm/pblk-read.c:421:18: warning: unused variable 'geo'
[-Wunused-variable]
struct nvm_geo *geo = &dev->geo;
On 2019/4/18 22:01, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/18, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2019/4/17 22:03, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 04/17, Chao Yu wrote:
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2019/4/17 10:31, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>>
On 04/18, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/4/17 22:03, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 04/17, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> Hi Jaegeuk,
> >>
> >> On 2019/4/17 10:31, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> >>> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
On 2019/4/17 22:03, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/17, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>
>> On 2019/4/17 10:31, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>>> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>>>
>>> fs/f2fs/node.c: In function 'f2fs_re
On 04/17, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> On 2019/4/17 10:31, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) produced this warning:
> >
> > fs/f2fs/node.c: In function 'f2fs_remove_inode_page':
> > fs/f2fs/node.c:1193
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2019/4/17 10:31, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> fs/f2fs/node.c: In function 'f2fs_remove_inode_page':
> fs/f2fs/node.c:1193:47: warning: format '%zu' expects argument o
Hi all,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
fs/f2fs/node.c: In function 'f2fs_remove_inode_page':
fs/f2fs/node.c:1193:47: warning: format '%zu' expects argument of type
'size_t', but argument 5 has type 'blkcnt_t' {aka 'long long un
On 11/7/18 8:31 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> /home/sfr/next/next/drivers/block/sunvdc.c: In function 'init_queue':
> /home/sfr/next/next/drivers/block/sunvdc.c:788:6: warning: unu
Hi Jens,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
produced this warning:
/home/sfr/next/next/drivers/block/sunvdc.c: In function 'init_queue':
/home/sfr/next/next/drivers/block/sunvdc.c:788:6: warning: unused variable
'ret' [-Wunused-variable]
int ret;
^
On 9/28/18 12:43 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:11:24AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>>
>> block/kyber-iosched.c:84:22: warning: integer overflow in e
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:11:24AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> block/kyber-iosched.c:84:22: warning: integer overflow in expression of type
> 'long int' results in '7050
Hi Jens,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
block/kyber-iosched.c:84:22: warning: integer overflow in expression of type
'long int' results in '705032704' [-Woverflow]
[KYBER_DISCARD] = 5 * NSEC_PER_SEC,
Hi Jens,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/md/md.c: In function 'mddev_put':
drivers/md/md.c:543:1: warning: the frame size of 2080 bytes is larger than
2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
}
^
This is caused because CONFI
On 5/14/18 2:29 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:51:39PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> The look entirely correct, but oddly enough my compiler did n
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:51:39PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
The look entirely correct, but oddly enough my compiler did not bother
to warn.
Fix below:
--
>From 6610bd5bbbf05
Hi all,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c: In function 'mspro_block_init_disk':
drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c:1173:24: warning: unused variable 'host'
[-Wunused-variable]
struct memstick
On 2017.05.09 at 21:00 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 05/09/2017 08:20 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On 2017.05.10 at 11:24 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi Jens,
> >>
> >> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> >> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
> >>
> >
Hi Markus,
On Wed, 10 May 2017 04:20:54 +0200 Markus Trippelsdorf
wrote:
>
> Yes, it was missing a (void) like "(void)strlcpy(...)". But Jens
> unfortunately removed both warnings, so the following patch should now
> be enough:
>
> diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
> index fda6be
On 05/09/2017 08:20 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2017.05.10 at 11:24 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>>
>> block/elevator.c: In function 'elv_iosched_store':
>> block/el
On 2017.05.10 at 11:24 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> block/elevator.c: In function 'elv_iosched_store':
> block/elevator.c:1102:2: warning: ignoring return value of 'strstr
Hi Jens,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
block/elevator.c: In function 'elv_iosched_store':
block/elevator.c:1102:2: warning: ignoring return value of 'strstrip', declared
with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
On 2014-10-22 19:28, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Jens,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
block/scsi_ioctl.c: In function 'sg_scsi_ioctl':
block/scsi_ioctl.c:520:1: warning: label 'out' defined but not used
[-Wunused-label]
out:
Hi Jens,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
block/scsi_ioctl.c: In function 'sg_scsi_ioctl':
block/scsi_ioctl.c:520:1: warning: label 'out' defined but not used
[-Wunused-label]
out:
^
Introduced by commit 374f8fdea4aa ("scsi: F
Hi Jens,
After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:13:0,
from drivers/block/skd_main.c:19:
drivers/block/skd_main.c: In function 'skd_cons_skmsg':
drivers/block/skd_main.c:4562:
58 matches
Mail list logo