On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 09:56:27PM +, Ernst, Justin wrote:
> After scratching my head for a while, I found that the issue was
> missing empty lines before three different code-block sections.
Oh great.
> The line number is definitely bogus, but I wasn't able to discover
> why.
Very helpful
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 06:05:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
> > these warnings:
> >
> > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sgi_uv:2: WARNING: Unexpected
> > indentation.
> >
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 06:05:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
> these warnings:
>
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sgi_uv:2: WARNING: Unexpected
> indentation.
>
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
these warnings:
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sgi_uv:2: WARNING: Unexpected
indentation.
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sgi_uv:2: WARNING: Unexpected
indentation.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 06:19:22PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
> these warnings:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c:666: warning: Function parameter or member
> 'encl' not described in
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
these warnings:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c:666: warning: Function parameter or member
'encl' not described in 'sgx_ioc_enclave_provision'
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c:666: warning: Excess function parameter
Hi all,
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 13:53:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced these warnings:
>
> net/dccp/probe.c: In function 'dccpprobe_init':
> net/dccp/probe.c:166:2: warning:
Hi all,
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 13:53:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced these warnings:
>
> net/dccp/probe.c: In function 'dccpprobe_init':
> net/dccp/probe.c:166:2: warning: 'register_jprobe' is deprecated
>
On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 09:01:34 +0100
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> > > net/sctp/probe.c: In function 'sctpprobe_exit':
> > > net/sctp/probe.c:240:2: warning: 'unregister_jprobe' is deprecated
> > > [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
> > >
On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 09:01:34 +0100
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> > > net/sctp/probe.c: In function 'sctpprobe_exit':
> > > net/sctp/probe.c:240:2: warning: 'unregister_jprobe' is deprecated
> > > [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
> > > unregister_jprobe(_recv_probe);
> > >
* Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > net/sctp/probe.c: In function 'sctpprobe_exit':
> > net/sctp/probe.c:240:2: warning: 'unregister_jprobe' is deprecated
> > [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
> > unregister_jprobe(_recv_probe);
> > ^
> > In file included from
* Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > net/sctp/probe.c: In function 'sctpprobe_exit':
> > net/sctp/probe.c:240:2: warning: 'unregister_jprobe' is deprecated
> > [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
> > unregister_jprobe(_recv_probe);
> > ^
> > In file included from net/sctp/probe.c:28:0:
> >
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 13:53:51 +1100
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced these warnings:
>
> net/dccp/probe.c: In function 'dccpprobe_init':
> net/dccp/probe.c:166:2: warning:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 13:53:51 +1100
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced these warnings:
>
> net/dccp/probe.c: In function 'dccpprobe_init':
> net/dccp/probe.c:166:2: warning: 'register_jprobe' is deprecated
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
produced these warnings:
net/dccp/probe.c: In function 'dccpprobe_init':
net/dccp/probe.c:166:2: warning: 'register_jprobe' is deprecated
[-Wdeprecated-declarations]
ret = register_jprobe(_send_probe);
^
In
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
produced these warnings:
net/dccp/probe.c: In function 'dccpprobe_init':
net/dccp/probe.c:166:2: warning: 'register_jprobe' is deprecated
[-Wdeprecated-declarations]
ret = register_jprobe(_send_probe);
^
In
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
produced these warnings:
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h:44:0,
from arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h:71,
from arch/x86/include/asm/math_emu.h:4,
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
produced these warnings:
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h:44:0,
from arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h:71,
from arch/x86/include/asm/math_emu.h:4,
Hi all,
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:37:29 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le perf)
> produced these warnings:
>
> Warning: tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h differs from kernel
> Warning:
Hi all,
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:37:29 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le perf)
> produced these warnings:
>
> Warning: tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h differs from kernel
> Warning: tools/arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
produced these warnings:
In file included from tools/include/linux/hashtable.h:12:0,
from elf.h:24,
from builtin-check.c:33:
tools/include/linux/bitops.h:12:0: error:
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
produced these warnings:
In file included from tools/include/linux/hashtable.h:12:0,
from elf.h:24,
from builtin-check.c:33:
tools/include/linux/bitops.h:12:0: error:
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le perf)
produced these warnings:
Warning: tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h differs from kernel
Warning: tools/arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h differs from kernel
Warning: tools/arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le perf)
produced these warnings:
Warning: tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h differs from kernel
Warning: tools/arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h differs from kernel
Warning: tools/arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allnoconfig)
produced these warnings:
kernel/sched/fair.c:801:22: warning: 'task_h_load' declared 'static' but never
defined [-Wunused-function]
kernel/sched/fair.c:1013:13: warning: 'account_offnode_enqueue' defined but not
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allnoconfig)
produced these warnings:
kernel/sched/fair.c:801:22: warning: 'task_h_load' declared 'static' but never
defined [-Wunused-function]
kernel/sched/fair.c:1013:13: warning: 'account_offnode_enqueue' defined but not
26 matches
Mail list logo