On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 06:18 +, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
> You may drop this patch if you wish so, but its not correct to say that this
> was not reviewed. Following are comments from "Arnd Bergmann"
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2013-May/047030.html
> And follow-up reasoning..
>
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 23:00 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> It was also applied today, after the merge window opened. Don't merge
> it for 3.11. Artem?
OK, dropping it.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt between
> commits
> >> 6c88058ef927 ("ARM: OMAP2+: cleaned-up DT support of various ECC
>
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt between commits
>> 6c88058ef927 ("ARM: OMAP2+: cleaned-up DT support of various ECC
>> schemes") and
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Gupta, Pekon pe...@ti.com wrote:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt between commits
6c88058ef927 (ARM: OMAP2+: cleaned-up DT support of various ECC
schemes) and
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Gupta, Pekon pe...@ti.com wrote:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt between
commits
6c88058ef927 (ARM: OMAP2+: cleaned-up DT support of various ECC
schemes)
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 23:00 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
It was also applied today, after the merge window opened. Don't merge
it for 3.11. Artem?
OK, dropping it.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 06:18 +, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
You may drop this patch if you wish so, but its not correct to say that this
was not reviewed. Following are comments from Arnd Bergmann
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2013-May/047030.html
And follow-up reasoning..
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt between commits
> 6c88058ef927 ("ARM: OMAP2+: cleaned-up DT support of various ECC
> schemes") and 212012138deb ("mtd: nand: omap2: updated support for
> BCH4
>
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig between commit 212012138deb ("mtd: nand: omap2:
updated support for BCH4 ECC scheme") from the l2-mtd tree and commit
930d800bded7 ("mtd: omap2: allow bulding as a module") from the arm-soc
tree.
I
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt between commits
6c88058ef927 ("ARM: OMAP2+: cleaned-up DT support of various ECC
schemes") and 212012138deb ("mtd: nand: omap2: updated support for BCH4
ECC scheme") from the
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt between commits
6c88058ef927 (ARM: OMAP2+: cleaned-up DT support of various ECC
schemes) and 212012138deb (mtd: nand: omap2: updated support for BCH4
ECC scheme) from the
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig between commit 212012138deb (mtd: nand: omap2:
updated support for BCH4 ECC scheme) from the l2-mtd tree and commit
930d800bded7 (mtd: omap2: allow bulding as a module) from the arm-soc
tree.
I fixed
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt between commits
6c88058ef927 (ARM: OMAP2+: cleaned-up DT support of various ECC
schemes) and 212012138deb (mtd: nand: omap2: updated support for
BCH4
ECC scheme)
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/boot/dts/spear13xx.dtsi between commit 6d7b42a447f9 ("mtd:
fsmc_nand: pass the ale and cmd resource via resource") from the l2-mtd
tree and commit f631b984ee10 ("ARM: SPEAr: DT: Fix existing DT support")
from the
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c between commit 06f255106923 ("mtd: remove use
of __devinit") from the l2-mtd tree and commit 4d62435f0601 ("mtd:
mxc_nand: remove cpu_is_xxx by using platform_device_id") from the
arm-soc tree.
I
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c between commit 06f255106923 (mtd: remove use
of __devinit) from the l2-mtd tree and commit 4d62435f0601 (mtd:
mxc_nand: remove cpu_is_xxx by using platform_device_id) from the
arm-soc tree.
I fixed
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/boot/dts/spear13xx.dtsi between commit 6d7b42a447f9 (mtd:
fsmc_nand: pass the ale and cmd resource via resource) from the l2-mtd
tree and commit f631b984ee10 (ARM: SPEAr: DT: Fix existing DT support)
from the arm-soc
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got conflicts in
drivers/mtd/nand/bcm_umi_nand.c and drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bcm_umi.h
between commit 07f4c69caf01 ("mtd: remove bcmring NAND driver") from the
l2-mtd tree and commit 878040ef831a ("ARM: bcmring: use proper MMIO
accessors") from
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got conflicts in
drivers/mtd/nand/bcm_umi_nand.c and drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bcm_umi.h
between commit 07f4c69caf01 (mtd: remove bcmring NAND driver) from the
l2-mtd tree and commit 878040ef831a (ARM: bcmring: use proper MMIO
accessors) from the
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 07:39:34PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> drivers/mtd/nand/orion_nand.c between commit 11a3910e730e ("mtd:
> orion_nand: remove include") from the l2-mtd tree and
> commit c02cecb92ed4 ("ARM:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
drivers/mtd/nand/orion_nand.c between commit 11a3910e730e ("mtd:
orion_nand: remove include") from the l2-mtd tree and
commit c02cecb92ed4 ("ARM: orion: move platform_data definitions") from
the arm-soc tree.
I fixed it up
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
drivers/mtd/nand/orion_nand.c between commit 11a3910e730e (mtd:
orion_nand: remove mach/hardware.h include) from the l2-mtd tree and
commit c02cecb92ed4 (ARM: orion: move platform_data definitions) from
the arm-soc tree.
I
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 07:39:34PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
drivers/mtd/nand/orion_nand.c between commit 11a3910e730e (mtd:
orion_nand: remove mach/hardware.h include) from the l2-mtd tree and
commit c02cecb92ed4
24 matches
Mail list logo
