Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> On Thu, 28 May 2015 17:25:07 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
>> include/linux/rcupdate.h between commits 0a04b0166929 ("rcu: Move
>> lockless_dereference() out of rcupdate.h") from the
Hi Rusty,
On Thu, 28 May 2015 17:25:07 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
> include/linux/rcupdate.h between commits 0a04b0166929 ("rcu: Move
> lockless_dereference() out of rcupdate.h") from the modules tree and
> c1ad348b452a ("tick:
Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au writes:
Hi Rusty,
On Thu, 28 May 2015 17:25:07 +1000 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
include/linux/rcupdate.h between commits 0a04b0166929 (rcu: Move
lockless_dereference() out
Hi Rusty,
On Thu, 28 May 2015 17:25:07 +1000 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
include/linux/rcupdate.h between commits 0a04b0166929 (rcu: Move
lockless_dereference() out of rcupdate.h) from the modules tree and
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:56:04AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 05:25:07PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
> > > include/linux/rcupdate.h between
* Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 05:25:07PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
> > include/linux/rcupdate.h between commits 0a04b0166929 ("rcu: Move
> > lockless_dereference() out of rcupdate.h")
* Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 05:25:07PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Paul,
Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
include/linux/rcupdate.h between commits 0a04b0166929 (rcu: Move
lockless_dereference() out of
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:56:04AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 05:25:07PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Paul,
Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
include/linux/rcupdate.h
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 05:25:07PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
> include/linux/rcupdate.h between commits 0a04b0166929 ("rcu: Move
> lockless_dereference() out of rcupdate.h") from the modules tree and
> c1ad348b452a
Hi Paul,
Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
include/linux/rcupdate.h between commits 0a04b0166929 ("rcu: Move
lockless_dereference() out of rcupdate.h") from the modules tree and
c1ad348b452a ("tick: Nohz: Rework next timer evaluation") from the tip
tree and commits
Hi Paul,
Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
include/linux/rcupdate.h between commits 0a04b0166929 (rcu: Move
lockless_dereference() out of rcupdate.h) from the modules tree and
c1ad348b452a (tick: Nohz: Rework next timer evaluation) from the tip
tree and commits
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 05:25:07PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Paul,
Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
include/linux/rcupdate.h between commits 0a04b0166929 (rcu: Move
lockless_dereference() out of rcupdate.h) from the modules tree and
c1ad348b452a (tick:
12 matches
Mail list logo