Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

2019-02-27 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 03:52:01PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethsw/ethsw.c > > between commit: > > 570b68c8ddde ("staging: fsl-dpaa2: ethsw: Handle SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET") > >

linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

2019-02-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in: drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethsw/ethsw.c between commit: 570b68c8ddde ("staging: fsl-dpaa2: ethsw: Handle SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET") from the net-next tree and commit: 11f27765f611 ("staging: fsl-dpaa2: ethsw: Add mis

linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

2018-03-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in: drivers/staging/irda/net/af_irda.c between commit: 9b2c45d479d0 ("net: make getname() functions return length rather than use int* parameter") from the net-next tree and commit: d64c2a76123f ("staging: irda: remove

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

2016-12-06 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 03:04:47PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c > > between commit: > > a52ad514fdf3 ("net: deprecate eth_change_mtu, remove usage") > > from the net-next

linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

2016-12-06 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Greg, Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in: drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c between commit: a52ad514fdf3 ("net: deprecate eth_change_mtu, remove usage") from the net-next tree and commit: 0af72df267f2 ("staging: slicoss: remove the staging driver") from t

linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

2016-11-23 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Greg, Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in: drivers/staging/unisys/include/iochannel.h between commit: d0c2c9973ecd ("net: use core MTU range checking in virt drivers") from the net-next tree and commit: b18f9c676f93 ("staging: unisys: include: fix pound def

linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

2016-10-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Greg, Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in: drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211netdev.c between commit: 9c22b4a34edd ("net: use core MTU range checking in wireless drivers") from the net-next tree and commit: 84ad1efa7d2b ("staging: wlan-ng: fix block comment war

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

2014-07-16 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 04:43:22PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in > drivers/staging/cxt1e1/linux.c between commit c835a6773314 ("net: set > name_assign_type in alloc_netdev()") from the net-next tree and commit > 14b596c

linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

2014-07-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Greg, Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in drivers/staging/cxt1e1/linux.c between commit c835a6773314 ("net: set name_assign_type in alloc_netdev()") from the net-next tree and commit 14b596c9d80b ("staging: cxt1e1: remove driver") from the staging tree. I fixed it up

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

2014-05-28 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:28:24PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in > drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/core.c between commit 77be2c54c5bd > ("mac80211: add vif to flush call") from the net-next tree and commit > 0cd05ba54a53 ("st

linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

2014-05-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Greg, Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/core.c between commit 77be2c54c5bd ("mac80211: add vif to flush call") from the net-next tree and commit 0cd05ba54a53 ("staging: rtl8821ae: core.c: Remove version specific code") from the staging tree

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

2014-03-27 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi Greg, > > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in > drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c between commit 8d4ade284a41 > ("wlags49_h2: Call dev_kfree/consume_skb_any instead of dev_kfree_skb") > from the net-next tree and commit fed3ffd8f7ef ("

linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

2014-03-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Greg, Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c between commit 8d4ade284a41 ("wlags49_h2: Call dev_kfree/consume_skb_any instead of dev_kfree_skb") from the net-next tree and commit fed3ffd8f7ef ("staging: wlags49_h2: reindent wl_netde

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

2014-03-17 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 07:08:42PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in > drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c between commit 3ead0d2e220e ("wlan-ng: > fixup staging driver for removal of ieee80211_dsss_chan_to_freq") from > the

linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

2014-03-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Greg, Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c between commit 3ead0d2e220e ("wlan-ng: fixup staging driver for removal of ieee80211_dsss_chan_to_freq") from the net-next tree and commit 4e5e9d7c66f0 ("staging: wlan-ng: replace function ie

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

2013-05-29 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 02:14:22PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in > drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c between commit 351638e7deee ("net: > pass info struct via netdevice notifier") from the net-next tree and > commit f

linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

2013-05-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Greg, Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c between commit 351638e7deee ("net: pass info struct via netdevice notifier") from the net-next tree and commit f84b075178b4 ("Staging: silicom: Fixed error 'do not initialise statics to 0 or

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

2013-01-22 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:45:25PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in > drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c between commit f9a8f83b04e0 ("net: phy: > remove flags argument from phy_{attach, connect, connect_direct}") from > the

linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree

2013-01-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Greg, Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c between commit f9a8f83b04e0 ("net: phy: remove flags argument from phy_{attach, connect, connect_direct}") from the net-next tree and commit 26ef1021c1c7 ("staging: et131x: Modify block comments