* Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After adding some printks, I started getting these:
>
> [ 597.036720] BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!
this should go away if you double the size of MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES in
kernel/lockdep_internals.h. (keep it a power of two) If it
After adding some printks, I started getting these:
[ 597.036720] BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!
[ 597.041546] turning off the locking correctness validator.
[ 597.047135] [] save_trace+0x8a/0x8f
[ 597.051751] [] mark_lock+0x65/0x3ff
[ 597.056366] [] save_trace+0x3e/0x8f
[
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 15:50 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Subject: Re: IPoIB caused a kernel: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
> >
> > >Feb 27 17:47:52 sw169 kernel: []
> > >_spin_lock_irqsave+0x15/0x24
> > >Feb 27 17:47:52 sw169 kernel:
> Quoting Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: lockdep question (was Re: IPoIB caused a kernel: BUG: soft
> lockup detected on CPU#0!)
>
>
> After adding some printks, I started getting these:
>
> [ 597.036720] BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!
> [ 597.041546] turning
> Quoting Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: IPoIB caused a kernel: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
>
> >Feb 27 17:47:52 sw169 kernel: []
> >_spin_lock_irqsave+0x15/0x24
> >Feb 27 17:47:52 sw169 kernel: []
> >:ib_ipoib:ipoib_neigh_destructor+0xc2/0x139
>
> It looks like
Quoting Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: IPoIB caused a kernel: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
Feb 27 17:47:52 sw169 kernel: [8053aaf1]
_spin_lock_irqsave+0x15/0x24
Feb 27 17:47:52 sw169 kernel: [88067a23]
:ib_ipoib:ipoib_neigh_destructor+0xc2/0x139
Quoting Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: lockdep question (was Re: IPoIB caused a kernel: BUG: soft
lockup detected on CPU#0!)
After adding some printks, I started getting these:
[ 597.036720] BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!
[ 597.041546] turning off the
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 15:50 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Quoting Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: IPoIB caused a kernel: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
Feb 27 17:47:52 sw169 kernel: [8053aaf1]
_spin_lock_irqsave+0x15/0x24
Feb 27 17:47:52 sw169 kernel:
After adding some printks, I started getting these:
[ 597.036720] BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!
[ 597.041546] turning off the locking correctness validator.
[ 597.047135] [c023a922] save_trace+0x8a/0x8f
[ 597.051751] [c023ae8c] mark_lock+0x65/0x3ff
[ 597.056366] [c023a8d6]
* Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After adding some printks, I started getting these:
[ 597.036720] BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!
this should go away if you double the size of MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES in
kernel/lockdep_internals.h. (keep it a power of two) If it doesnt
10 matches
Mail list logo
