On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:18:53PM +, Todd M. Roy wrote:
>
> I've been on vacation
>
> Nope, no snapshots.
>
> Well, I couldn't get my orginal volume group visible under both
> lvm 0.8 and 0.9. I don't know why. So I grabbed a big empty hard disk,
> created a new volume group that
I've been on vacation
Nope, no snapshots.
Well, I couldn't get my orginal volume group visible under both
lvm 0.8 and 0.9. I don't know why. So I grabbed a big empty hard disk,
created a new volume group that was visible under both, dded all the logical
volumes over to it, updated fstab
I've been on vacation
Nope, no snapshots.
Well, I couldn't get my orginal volume group visible under both
lvm 0.8 and 0.9. I don't know why. So I grabbed a big empty hard disk,
created a new volume group that was visible under both, dded all the logical
volumes over to it, updated fstab
I've been on vacation
Nope, no snapshots.
Well, I couldn't get my orginal volume group visible under both
lvm 0.8 and 0.9. I don't know why. So I grabbed a big empty hard disk,
created a new volume group that was visible under both, dded all the logical
volumes over to it, updated fstab
I've been on vacation
Nope, no snapshots.
Well, I couldn't get my orginal volume group visible under both
lvm 0.8 and 0.9. I don't know why. So I grabbed a big empty hard disk,
created a new volume group that was visible under both, dded all the logical
volumes over to it, updated fstab
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:18:53PM +, Todd M. Roy wrote:
I've been on vacation
Nope, no snapshots.
Well, I couldn't get my orginal volume group visible under both
lvm 0.8 and 0.9. I don't know why. So I grabbed a big empty hard disk,
created a new volume group that was
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 04:29:19PM -0500, Todd M. Roy wrote:
> group is visible, and you just told meit should be, then I can just
> copy volumes over under test13-pre3 and destroy and recreate the
> first volume group.
Is it possible you had a snapshot in the volume group when you started
lvm
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 04:29:19PM -0500, Todd M. Roy wrote:
group is visible, and you just told meit should be, then I can just
copy volumes over under test13-pre3 and destroy and recreate the
first volume group.
Is it possible you had a snapshot in the volume group when you started
lvm 0.9
Andre,
One of my two volume groups, unfortunately the one with
/usr, /var, /opt, and /home, isn't recognized by 0.9's vgscan when
I reboot under 2.4.0-test13-pre4.But since the second volume
group is visible, and you just told meit should be, then I can just
copy volumes over under
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 02:24:39PM -0500, Todd M. Roy wrote:
>
> Now that in 2.4.0-test12-pre4, lvm 0.9 has replaced 0.8, is it possible
> to do a conversion of lvm created physical volumes, volume groups
> and logical volumes from 0.8 to 0.9?
on-disk format isn't changed so no conversion is
Now that in 2.4.0-test12-pre4, lvm 0.9 has replaced 0.8, is it possible
to do a conversion of lvm created physical volumes, volume groups
and logical volumes from 0.8 to 0.9?
Sorry if this is already a FAQ that I just haven't found yet.
-- todd --
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 02:24:39PM -0500, Todd M. Roy wrote:
Now that in 2.4.0-test12-pre4, lvm 0.9 has replaced 0.8, is it possible
to do a conversion of lvm created physical volumes, volume groups
and logical volumes from 0.8 to 0.9?
on-disk format isn't changed so no conversion is
Andre,
One of my two volume groups, unfortunately the one with
/usr, /var, /opt, and /home, isn't recognized by 0.9's vgscan when
I reboot under 2.4.0-test13-pre4.But since the second volume
group is visible, and you just told meit should be, then I can just
copy volumes over under
13 matches
Mail list logo
