On 07/08/2014 10:51 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:56:16PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Okay, I'm really lost. I got the following when fuzzing, and can't really
>> explain what's going on. It seems that we get a "unable to handle kernel
>> paging request"
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:56:16PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Okay, I'm really lost. I got the following when fuzzing, and can't really
> explain what's
> going on. It seems that we get a "unable to handle kernel paging request"
> when running
> rather simple code, and I can't
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:56:16PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi all,
Okay, I'm really lost. I got the following when fuzzing, and can't really
explain what's
going on. It seems that we get a unable to handle kernel paging request
when running
rather simple code, and I can't figure out
On 07/08/2014 10:51 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:56:16PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi all,
Okay, I'm really lost. I got the following when fuzzing, and can't really
explain what's going on. It seems that we get a unable to handle kernel
paging request when running
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:17:55PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 06/13/2014 12:13 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:01:37AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > another theory: Trinity can sometimes generate plausible looking module
> > addresses and pass those in structs etc.
> >
>
On 06/13/2014 12:13 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:01:37AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > On 06/12/2014 11:27 PM, Dan Aloni wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:56:16PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > >> > Hi all,
> > >> >
> > >> > Okay, I'm really lost. I got the
On 06/13/2014 12:13 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:01:37AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 06/12/2014 11:27 PM, Dan Aloni wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:56:16PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi all,
Okay, I'm really lost. I got the following when fuzzing, and
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:17:55PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 06/13/2014 12:13 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:01:37AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
another theory: Trinity can sometimes generate plausible looking module
addresses and pass those in structs etc.
I wonder
On 06/13/2014 12:13 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:01:37AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > On 06/12/2014 11:27 PM, Dan Aloni wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:56:16PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > >> > Hi all,
> > >> >
> > >> > Okay, I'm really lost. I got the
On 06/13/2014 12:13 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:01:37AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 06/12/2014 11:27 PM, Dan Aloni wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:56:16PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi all,
Okay, I'm really lost. I got the following when fuzzing, and
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 07:55:55AM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote:
> And also, the Oops code of 0003 (PF_WRITE and PF_USER) might hint at
> what Dave wrote.
Scrape what I wrote about that, it's PF_PROT | PF_WRITE.
--
Dan Aloni
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 07:55:55AM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote:
> > that theory went away. (also confirmed by not finding a netlink module.)
> >
> > What about the kernel .text overflowing into the modules space? The loader
> > checks for that, but can something like that happen after everything is
>
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:01:37AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 06/12/2014 11:27 PM, Dan Aloni wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:56:16PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > Okay, I'm really lost. I got the following when fuzzing, and can't
> >> > really explain what's
>
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:01:37AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 06/12/2014 11:27 PM, Dan Aloni wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:56:16PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > Okay, I'm really lost. I got the following when fuzzing, and can't
> >> > really explain
On 06/12/2014 11:27 PM, Dan Aloni wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:56:16PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Okay, I'm really lost. I got the following when fuzzing, and can't really
>> > explain what's
>> > going on. It seems that we get a "unable to handle kernel paging
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:56:16PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Okay, I'm really lost. I got the following when fuzzing, and can't really
> explain what's
> going on. It seems that we get a "unable to handle kernel paging request"
> when running
> rather simple code, and I can't
Hi all,
Okay, I'm really lost. I got the following when fuzzing, and can't really
explain what's
going on. It seems that we get a "unable to handle kernel paging request" when
running
rather simple code, and I can't figure out how it would cause it.
The code in question is (in
Hi all,
Okay, I'm really lost. I got the following when fuzzing, and can't really
explain what's
going on. It seems that we get a unable to handle kernel paging request when
running
rather simple code, and I can't figure out how it would cause it.
The code in question is (in
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:56:16PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi all,
Okay, I'm really lost. I got the following when fuzzing, and can't really
explain what's
going on. It seems that we get a unable to handle kernel paging request
when running
rather simple code, and I can't figure out
On 06/12/2014 11:27 PM, Dan Aloni wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:56:16PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi all,
Okay, I'm really lost. I got the following when fuzzing, and can't really
explain what's
going on. It seems that we get a unable to handle kernel paging request
when
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:01:37AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 06/12/2014 11:27 PM, Dan Aloni wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:56:16PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi all,
Okay, I'm really lost. I got the following when fuzzing, and can't
really explain what's
going on.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:01:37AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 06/12/2014 11:27 PM, Dan Aloni wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:56:16PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi all,
Okay, I'm really lost. I got the following when fuzzing, and can't
really explain what's
going on. It seems
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 07:55:55AM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote:
that theory went away. (also confirmed by not finding a netlink module.)
What about the kernel .text overflowing into the modules space? The loader
checks for that, but can something like that happen after everything is
up and
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 07:55:55AM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote:
And also, the Oops code of 0003 (PF_WRITE and PF_USER) might hint at
what Dave wrote.
Scrape what I wrote about that, it's PF_PROT | PF_WRITE.
--
Dan Aloni
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
24 matches
Mail list logo